Arch Stanton
Well Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2023
- Messages
- 1,228
- Reaction score
- 97
- Points
- 63
- Faith
- Catholic
- Politics
- Conservative
Peter was given the keys.Why not chose the apostle John rather than Peter
Peter was given the keys.Why not chose the apostle John rather than Peter
Those protesting ecclesial communities may have "failure" but we still have hope that they come home.It explains their "failure" in your eyes.
and that 'time' in the NT had Peter [and his successors] leading Christ's ONE true ChurchThe NT is a time, beginning with Christ, just as the OT is a time, before Christ.
They went out from us, but they were not really of our number; if they had been, they would have remained with us. Their desertion shows that none of them was of our number.Can I assume you are referring to 1 John 2:19? "They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us."
No, John doesn't say "they came out of us", and in fact he goes to the trouble to point out that THEY WERE NOT OF US. Where, then, do you get the notion that they were part of the one faith???
1 Tim 2:3-4 This is good and pleasing to God our savior,One cannot ‘seek’ the true Church. One can be placed into THE Church, by God.
Those that are ‘called out’.
Seeking Christ through His Church.Seeking a church rather than seeking salvation??
Do you mean the key the power of the Holy Spirit that was revealed towards Peter not from peter dying flesh and blood The Key Peter our brother in the lord usurped as if he was the Christ .That keyPeter was given the keys.
And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it.How do you personally interpret the key verse below .The key of Catholicism??the qualification for the Pope ?
Mathew 17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven
Through a law of the legion of fathers according to oral traditons of dying mankind? And not through sola scriptura all things writen in the law and prophetsSeeking Christ through His Church.
(not a legion of fathers as gods)
believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets: . . . .( sola scriptura, the one way up to heaven doctrine )
because Christ established His Church as the pillar of truth and sola scriptura is a false doctrine created by man in the sixteenth centuryThrough a law of the legion of fathers according to oral traditons of dying mankind? And not through sola scriptura all things writen in the law and prophets
Why would I do that?
And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it.
I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”
Catholicism - the pillar of truth; wisdom of God made known through her; obey those that have rule over you; whoever listens to you listens to me; the spirit of truth will be with you always; the spirit of truth will guide you to all truth; I am with you always, until the end of the age.
All those communities of saving faith in Christ are church (ek-klesia, called-out assembly), "ecclesial," communitiesThose protesting ecclesial communities may have "failure" but we still have hope that they come home.
Don't see any "successors" of Peter presented in the NT.and that 'time' in the NT had Peter [and his successors] leading Christ's ONE true Church
God's authroity It was restored during the 1st century reformation 15th a shadow carbon copy of those who call all things writen in the law and prophets dying mankind ,sola scriptura . . heresybecause Christ established His Church as the pillar of truth and sola scriptura is a false doctrine created by man in the sixteenth century
The word “Apostle”, from the Greek apostello “to send forth”, “to dispatch”.... those 16th century communities were not 'sent forth' through the laying on of hands. No succession equals no authority to teach.All those communities of saving faith in Christ are church (ek-klesia, called-out assembly), "ecclesial," communities
Once again, you are starting with a false premise. Nowhere in the Bible do we see it as an all-inclusive manual. You do see Linus though --Don't see any "successors" of Peter presented in the NT.
Who is binding and loosing? Peter and the other apostles --quite CatholicTrying to say it binding loosening is "we are the church"
v17 Jesus said to him in reply, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah. For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my heavenly Father.What is your personal understanding of 17 the foundation of the matter.?
Succession does not guarantee inerrancy.The word “Apostle”, from the Greek apostello “to send forth”, “to dispatch”.... those 16th century communities were not 'sent forth' through the laying on of hands.
No succession equals no authority to teach.
Which does not alter the fact that whatever is not authorized or in agreement with the NT is in error, for God does not contradict his word.Once again, you are starting with a false premise. Nowhere in the Bible do we see it as an all-inclusive manual.
the infallibility would be through dogmas.... the Holy Spirit does not allow errorsSuccession does not guarantee inerrancy.
through His Church authority.... it started with Peter and the other apostles and then the teaching authority went through those with hands laid on themThe only authority for teaching is the Holy Spirit.
In a sense you are correct -- the Holy Spirit may guide those outside of Christ's Catholic Church in multiple manners.No one Christian community has a monopoly on the Holy Spirit.
His word never states everything is written in the Bible... He gave us a teaching authorityWhich does not alter the fact that whatever is not authorized or in agreement with the NT is in error, for God does not contradict his word.