No, I mean what excuse does a believer have not to believe the truth?You mean a believer has freewill to overcome stress?
Do you think you might actually answer the question instead of responding with another question please?
No, I mean what excuse does a believer have not to believe the truth?You mean a believer has freewill to overcome stress?
The transformation of our faith happens after we believe; yet, another flavour of Calvinism?
What do you mean? Do you ignore the sovereignty of God in order to tickle your ears?By Him decreeing to present to you with offering the Truth that you have neglecting, needed sound doctrine that would snap you out of the
concept that our relationship of God is based upon his sovereignty. Which is time and space dimension hopping.
So ignoring God's sovereignty is the answer?Thinking always in terms of God's sovereignty as our guiding light is fatalism.
God decrees in himself all things whatsoever comes to pass, that would include the inability of a believer not to believe the truth; one cannot do otherwise.No, I mean what excuse does a believer have not to believe the truth?
...
We can choose to believe in ourselves or in any other gods, we can also choose to believe the gospel and place our faith in Christ alone to save us from sin and the wrath of God to come....
Now, you tell us what you believe faith is.... I told you what mine is.
What do you mean? Do you ignore the sovereignty of God in order to tickle your ears?
God decreed in himself all things whatsoever comes to pass, including what I read and write; I can do no other.You read the King James, I see...
Why did you not write you comment in the archaic King James English, may I ask?
Well! Mr. Robot! Preprogrammed by God ... no choice to be made.God decreed in himself all things whatsoever comes to pass, including what I read and write; I can do no other.
You do not get the irony.Well! Mr. Robot! Preprogrammed by God ... no choice to be made.
...
amazing.....
You do not get the irony.
Do you define sovereignty as:There goes God's sovereignty again.
(now, let's see what He had programmed for you to do next)
Do you define sovereignty as:
God hath decreed in himself, from all eternity, by the most wise and holy counsel of his own will, freely and
unchangeably, all things, whatsoever comes to pass;
Then why does He judge a person for not believing if it is He who is responsible for that?You mean a believer has freewill to overcome stress?
God decrees in himself all things whatsoever comes to pass, that would include the inability of a believer not to believe the truth; one cannot do otherwise.
We are talking past each other; I agree with what you said. By irony, I was responding as a Calvinist.That Decree was developed by man. God did not speak those words to Moses from a mountain.
Man devised the decree according to man's limited understanding of what omniscience means to man.
God decreed that man use his volition that God created man to have, to be used it according to a man's spiritual status.
Do you think God named all the animals, and Adam simply parroted the names back?
Now the Lord God had formed out of the ground all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name." Gen 2:19
grace and peace ............
I was responding as a Calvinist.Then why does He judge a person for not believing if it is He who is responsible for that?
We are talking past each other; I agree with what you said. By irony, I was responding as a Calvinist.
I see. Well I don't have a problem discussing with people if they want to play "devil's advocate" ( I do it with myself all the time) but it would have been helpful if you had stated that at the beginning of the discussion.I was responding as a Calvinist.
I usually end up discussing with Calvinists, rare I end up challenging non-Calvinist.I see. Well I don't have a problem discussing with people if they want to play "devil's advocate" ( I do it with myself all the time) but it would have been helpful if you had stated that at the beginning of the discussion.
peace of the Lord be with you.
Trouble with "association" I find too many assumptions get made as, like the other poster, I don't consider myself a Calvinist or Armenian. I'd much rather we listen to each other as individuals and not put each other in boxes.I usually end up discussing with Calvinists, rare I end up challenging non-Calvinist.
I assumed everyone was a Calvinist; but you are correct, it would be nice if association was included and viewable in the avatar.
"Not C/A" would fit nicely in avatar; neither am I 'C/A'.Trouble with "association" I find too many assumptions get made as, like the other poster, I don't consider myself a Calvinist or Armenian. I'd much rather we listen to each other as individuals and not put each other in boxes.![]()