• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

Why Have You Forsaken Me?

What? My wife is 'make believe'? I thought she was the 1st cause of the club constantly hitting me. :unsure:
🤪
No. That's "immediate cause" —not first cause. But this thread isn't about free will :LOL: :ROFLMAO:
 
“My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” Matthew 27:46

But your iniquities have separated
you from your God;
your sins have hidden his face from you,
so that he will not hear. Isaiah 59:2

That's not proof that Jesus died spiritually. I'm assuming you know that the word "forsaken" isn't referring to the idea of inseparability being broken in the Trinity and the inseparability being broken in the Hypostatic Union. After all, the Son has inseparability to the Father and the Holy Spirit is according to the Divine Nature. And the three persons are undivided and inseparable in the economic relations because they are undivided inseparable in the Divine Nature. And the human nature is undivided and inseparable to the Divine Nature by the Son-Person.

Unless you believe "separated" means "forsaken."
Exactly
 
The question to Civic was, Why do you believe that Death isn't Separation from God?

I'm big into avoiding Category Mistakes. I would like to hear him declare that Death isn't Separation from God...

How about you?
I believe death without Christ is separation from all possibility of ever having eternal life in His kingdom. What that looks like in reality, I do not know---but try and remember your condition before you were in Christ from the perspective of being in Him. Though you did not know it, you had no hope, no help. Everything in your life was vanity. In that sense, death without Christ is separation from God. If God is everywhere, He is also in some way present with those in hell, and I cannot therefore will not, even begin to ponder, let alone speculate, what that would mean. Death without Christ is separation from the life of God and the goodness of God.
 
What the Father did allow to happen and not rescue His Son from was His death and suffering from those wicked leaders to be our sacrifice for sin. The entire weight of that was upon Him to bear alone, but the Father never left Him.

He was there hearing His prayers and answering them upon His death.
My God, my God, why have You forsaken me?
Far from my help are the words of my groaning.
2 My God, I cry out by day, but You do not answer;
And by night, but I have no rest.


For here Jesus cries out to God, believing that he has been forsaken by him, asking why he has been forsaken, and asserting that God is silent. He receives no answer.
Yet you say He was there hearing and answering his prayers.
Moreover, let us not forget Jesus' promise to the sinner, "Today, you will be with me in paradise Luke 23:4."
This could be a hypostatic discussion. With God, there is always a mystery isn't there?
For God so loved the world that He gave His Only Begotten Son that whosoever believes in Him will not perish but have everlasting life. The Trinity was never fractured, broken, or severed for even a moment, but together, the Godhead accomplished salvation for sinners.
This saying is misleading because no one ever said the Trinity was fractured. This is suggesting there is a problem here when there isn't. As we know the resurrection followed the crucifixion. So there is no fracture or issue.
The following scriptures affirm that Jesus' relationship with the Father on the cross was still there and not broken, abandoned or forsaken.
I won't debate a strawman, I'm not obligated to debate something I don't believe.

Here is what James Montgomery Boice had to say on this point.
according to the teaching of the New Testament, Jesus was indeed forsaken by God while he bore the sin of his people on the cross. This is the very essence of the atonement—Jesus bearing our hell in order that we might share his heaven. To be forsaken means to have the light of God’s countenance and the sense of his presence eclipsed, which is what happened to Jesus as he bore the wrath of God against sin for us.
How could this happen? How could one member of the eternal Trinity turn his back on another member of the Trinity? I do not know. I cannot explain it. But I believe that this is what the Bible teaches, so great was the love of God for us and so great was the price Jesus willingly paid to save us from our iniquities.

It is difficult and disturbing, which is why so many people have invented theories to explain it.

I sense that with you as well.
If you would like, proceed with John 3:16 on this subject, as how you connect it together to prove your theory. Thanks :)



There was not interruption even for a millisecond in the Tri-Unity of God the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
Were talking about the Godhead? Of course not.
There was no change since God is Immutable. The Son cannot be separated from the Father or Holy Spirit. And we must never forget Jesus is a Divine Person who assumed a human nature, He is not a human person but a Divine Person. It was the Divine Son bearing our sins in the flesh.
You should be careful here. Jesus is 100% human and 100% God. He is a divine person. To say he was not really human, you would have to bring that discussion to the proper forum.
Psalm 22:24
For he has not despised or scorned
the suffering of the afflicted one;
he has not hidden his face from him
but has listened to his cry for help
.
Psalm 22:19 and on, finds his communion with God restored. It's a cry of triumph, not despair. It marks when the period of darkness passes from Jesus' suffering which was a true alienation from the Father as punishment for our sins, and where Jesus becomes aware of God's presence and favor once again.

You are mixing this whole Psalm together, distorting it, and working from there. Interesting theory, ill give you that. Do you not see the turning point in the Psalm?

Luke 23:46
Jesus called out with a loud voice, "Father, into your hands I commit my spirit." When he had said this, he breathed his last.
And this works in your theory how?
John 16:32
"A time is coming and in fact has come when you will be scattered, each to your own home. You will leave me all alone. Yet I am not alone, for my Father is with me."

Hebrews 5:7
During the days of Jesus’ life on earth, he offered up prayers and petitions with fervent cries and tears to the one who could save him from death, and he was heard because of his reverent submission.

Jesus' promise to the thief on the cross that today you will be with Me in Paradise reaffirms Jesus went to be with the Father and not suffer in hell as some teach.
Can you come right out and speak the facts of how these support your theory?
It was a Triune effort that worked out to perfection as They had planned from the very beginning. Furthermore, when this reconciliation took place at the cross, we read that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself - 2 Corinthians 5:19.

The book of Romans states that "God demonstrated His love for us that while we were still sinners Christ died for us" (Romans 5:8). So Jesus' sacrificial atonement both propitiates (turns away God’s wrath) and expiates (covers our sins).
Expiate: Removes our sins. Atoned for, made satisfaction for. It's important to have this right.
Gods’ wrath does not fall on the sacrifice.
Scripture from beginning to end teaches Christ and him crucified. The OT sacrifices are a type and shadow of the Lamb of God. God's wrath did fall on Christ. There is no way around it.
Scripture teaches us that sin was condemned in the flesh, not that Jesus was condemned (Romans 8:3).

hope this helps !!! :)
Personally, my friend, I think you do not have a good practice of dividing the word. Psalm 22 for one example, you don't seem to recognize the turning point in the Psalm and you mix it all together which distorts it. And it's from that distortion you try and teach.

I would be interested in proceeding and looking into this topic with you and others. But let's do it respectfully, and consider others. And may all the glory go to God alone. Only He is worthy.
 
Last edited:
Yes, Jesus was forsaken of all help and relief of His suffering on the cross, whereas all through through the life He lived before that He had it.
Lost me here.
But that does not mean that He did not suffer the wrath of God on the cross.
Amen to that.
 
How could this happen? How could one member of the eternal Trinity turn his back on another member of the Trinity? I do not know. I cannot explain it.
I explain it (IMO) by saying that God is immutable which is the say the three members of the Trinity are immutable (premise 1).
The forsaken (turning of God's back) is the relationship of the divine nature to the human nature (premise 2); there was no longer a connection (forsaken) between the two natures from the human nature's point of view (conclusion).
Just like the human nature of Christ did not know the time of his coming because the divine nature of Christ did not communicate it to the human nature. In effect, this knowledge was "held back" (forsaken) from the human nature.

IMO
 
I explain it (IMO) by saying that God is immutable which is the say the three members of the Trinity are immutable (premise 1).
The forsaken (turning of God's back) is the relationship of the divine nature to the human nature (premise 2); there was no longer a connection (forsaken) between the two natures from the human nature's point of view (conclusion).
Just like the human nature of Christ did not know the time of his coming because the divine nature of Christ did not communicate it to the human nature. In effect, this knowledge was "held back" (forsaken) from the human nature.

IMO
Well, I have to disagree. I believe Jesus didn't know certain things because he willed not to know certain things. Ill leave it there.
 
Well, I have to disagree. I believe Jesus didn't know certain things because he willed not to know certain things.
Well, then Jesus did not have a human nature because it is not possible for a human nature to be omnipotent.
Besides, my main point was that when the Bible speaks of Christ to be forsaken it was the human nature that was forsaken for the relationship between the members of the Trinity is immutable and God cannot forsake God through out eternity.
Ill leave it there.
Sweet ... I get the last word ... *giggle*
 
Lost me here.
While Jesus was walking the earth, before the cross, the Father helped Him as a man. The angels ministered to Him at His temptation, He did not allow Jesus to be killed before it was time etc. On the cross there was no deliverance from the cross. There was no removing of the cup He had to drink. There was no blocking of the pain and shame. There was mercy though in that the time on the cross before He died was shortened. If I am not mistaken, it was three hours when usually it is all day and then the bones have to be broken so the person will finish dying.

God did forsake Jesus on the cross. It is undeniable. Jesus said it. We don't know exactly what that was or how that was to the one perfect Righteous. We only know that Jesus knew that He was forsaken of God at that time, but not forever.
 
Last edited:
Well, then Jesus did not have a human nature because it is not possible for a human nature to be omnipotent.
Besides,
Is the hypostatic union so easy for you?
I'm shocked you would make such a statement.

If you continue to make statements like this, I won't be so sure you know his person.

The Son.



my main point was that when the Bible speaks of Christ to be forsaken it was the human nature that was forsaken for the relationship between the members of the Trinity is immutable and God cannot forsake God through out eternity.

Sweet ... I get the last word ... *giggle*
 
I'm shocked you would make such a statement.
I don't see why. I backed it up with logic which you have not addressed.

Then I pointed out that your statement which follows contradicts the idea that God is immutable. It also contradicts that each of the members of the Trinity are of the 'same mind' so to speak as one member forsakes another somehow.
How could one member of the eternal Trinity turn his back on another member of the Trinity? I do not know. I cannot explain it. But I believe that this is what the Bible teaches


Ill leave it there.
Hey, that's not fair .... you cheated *giggle* j/k ..... take another shot ...it's interesting.
 
I don't see why. I backed it up with logic which you have not addressed.

Then I pointed out that your statement which follows contradicts the idea that God is immutable. It also contradicts that each of the members of the Trinity are of the 'same mind' so to speak as one member forsakes another somehow.




Hey, that's not fair .... you cheated *giggle* j/k ..... take another shot ...it's interesting.
Jesus is one person. Not two.
 
“My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” Matthew 27:46

But your iniquities have separated
you from your God;
your sins have hidden his face from you,
so that he will not hear. Isaiah 59:2

That's not proof that Jesus died spiritually. I'm assuming you know that the word "forsaken" isn't referring to the idea of inseparability being broken in the Trinity and the inseparability being broken in the Hypostatic Union. After all, the Son has inseparability to the Father and the Holy Spirit is according to the Divine Nature. And the three persons are undivided and inseparable in the economic relations because they are undivided inseparable in the Divine Nature. And the human nature is undivided and inseparable to the Divine Nature by the Son-Person.

Unless you believe "separated" means "forsaken."
God as Christ cannot die.
Jesus the Son of man was struck by the Father according to Isaiah 53 , sufferings for our sin , By his wound (not death) we are healed. A living sacrifice. God does not accept dead things.
 
Jesus is one person. Not two.
Agreed... one person with 2 natures where as you and I have one nature (unless you consider the Spirit in us).

One person as we define it cannot both know a fact and not know a fact at the same moment in time. This can be explained by the hypostatic union theory.

Premise 1: Christ said He did not know the time of his return. (human nature)
Premise 2: Christ is God (divine nature)
Premise 3: God knows all things (Divine nature)
.... so either you have a contradiction if you define PERSON as the dictionary would do ... or somehow Christ human nature is a subset of the divine nature and as a subset is limited in knowledge, time duration, location in space, etc. Christ is a person of a different order than we are ... just as some describe the Trinity as 3 persons but not as we define persons; rather, it is an analogy ... yahda, yahda.

I'd better be careful .. .I'm get over my skis *giggle*
 
But do you think that the people who claim Jesus wasn't forsaken by the Father arent mocking Christ?
Just curious.
Forsaken not deserted.
 
Agreed... one person with 2 natures where as you and I have one nature (unless you consider the Spirit in us).

One person as we define it cannot both know a fact and not know a fact at the same moment in time. This can be explained by the hypostatic union theory.

Premise 1: Christ said He did not know the time of his return. (human nature)
Premise 2: Christ is God (divine nature)
Premise 3: God knows all things (Divine nature)
.... so either you have a contradiction if you define PERSON as the dictionary would do ... or somehow Christ human nature is a subset of the divine nature and as a subset is limited in knowledge, time duration, location in space, etc. Christ is a person of a different order than we are ... just as some describe the Trinity as 3 persons but not as we define persons; rather, it is an analogy ... yahda, yahda.

I'd better be careful .. .I'm get over my skis *giggle*
Well I won’t argue this point now. I’ll just say, Jesus is one person, both divine and human. Since he is God, he knows all things. If there is one thing he says he does not know, I don’t agree it’s because the divine nature didn’t tell him. I believe it’s because he wills not to know. He is God after all. And there is a mystery here as well,
 
Back
Top