No Deal with the Devil: Christ's Ransom and the Justice of God

[JesusFan]

Not “someone” … “the soul that sins” MUST DIE.
[for the record, everyone that I know either HAS or WILL die, so the penalty shall be paid.]

We die due to the judgement of god towards us as sinners, so its either us or Jesus who dies for those sins

 

[Arial]

Not “someone” … “the soul that sins” MUST DIE.
[for the record, everyone that I know either HAS or WILL die, so the penalty shall be paid.]

As Voddie Baucham often said: "The death rate is 100%. One per person."

 

[John Bauer]

Not “someone”—“the soul that sins” MUST DIE.

I can't speak for him, of course, but he may have meant "someone" in the sense of either the sinner or the substitute. One or the other, someone must pay the due penalty.

(For the record, everyone that I know either has or will die. So, the penalty shall be paid.)

I lose track of who believes what around here, so that's the reason for this question:

Do you accept or reject the penal substitutionary atonement doctrine?