ReverendRV
Well Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2023
- Messages
- 2,024
- Reaction score
- 597
- Points
- 113
I was watching a Video today, which I will keep watching over again to better understand it. I liked that it said Christ's Keeping of the Law would fall short of Fulfillment without him also experiencing the Consequences for it being Broken. He Reaped the Blessings for Keeping it, so he had to Reap the Consequences; to experience that too. In order to experience this, he had to be our Substitute. Of course he did this out of Love, but a side effect of the Atonement would be God experiencing the Consequences of Sin as well...I take exception to the wording above. Jesus did not fulfill the Law in His death, He bore the consequences that breaking the Law would bring, in our place. Or in our room as the old timers worded it. And fulfilling the Law was more than keeping the legal code, but was also the perfect righteousness of God that is expressed in the Law. The law of God we are all under, and all obligated to keep, perfectly summarized in the ten commandments.
I only say this because of something I came across in another thread. A poster, that according to all his posts, does not appear to believe in the substitutionary death of Jesus in any way, shape, or form. He made the statement that Jesus was obedient unto death to fulfill the Law, so we can learn to be meek like Him. Loose paraphrase, but the idea that was presented. IOW, interpreting the passage in 1 Peter 2:21-24 to mean that He was enduring the sins of those who crucified Him without complaint---making that a part of the Law that He fulfilled---to teach us that we too are to die to sin and live to righteousness.
So to me, to say "Without experiencing the consequences, the Law was unfulfilled" I think is a misstatement. It was perfect righteousness that Christ fulfilled.
Last edited: