• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

The Apostles Creed Missing Ingredient?

Would the apostles have a statement about the NT before it was written?
How did the apostles teach the word before it was written

The apostolic church does not require scripture to know the truth
 
Christian doctrine and salvation in Christ, who is our righteousness, holiness and redemption, is the revelation of the NT.
No it’s the revelation of Jesus Christ who founded a church ((household of faith)) to teach all men unto eternal salvation! Matt 28:19 not a ((publishing house))
 
Christian doctrine and salvation in Christ, who is our righteousness, holiness and redemption, is the revelation of the NT.
‘Does the Apostles Creed leave out a statement concerning the very foundation upon which the Apostles Creed is based on...the Scripture themselves?
 
Christ is the word
Christ and his church are one acts 9:4 eph 5:32
‘Does the Apostles Creed leave out a statement concerning the very foundation upon which the Apostles Creed is based on...the Scripture themselves?
 
‘Does the Apostles Creed leave out a statement concerning the very foundation upon which the Apostles Creed is based on...the Scripture themselves?
Are the scriptures the basis of the Christian faith?
 
The apostolic church does not require scripture to know the truth
Wow!. . .so Scripture can be ignored in relation to the truth?

Evidently Jesus didn't get the memo, for he treated arguments from Scripture as having clinching force. When he said,
1) "It is written," that was final. There was no appeal against Scripture (Mt 4:4, 7, 10), for
2 ) "the Scripture cannot be broken." (Jn 10:35) God's word holds good forever.
He constantly scolded the Jews for their ignorance and neglect of Scripture:
3) "Are you not in error because you do not know the Scriptures?" (Mk 12:24)
4) "Have you not read. . .?" (Mt 12:3, 5, 19:4, 21:16, 42)
5) "Go and learn what this means. . ." (Mt 9:13)
 
No it’s the revelation of Jesus Christ who founded a church ((household of faith)) to teach all men unto eternal salvation! Matt 28:19 not a ((publishing house))
Which is the NT.
 
‘Does the Apostles Creed leave out a statement concerning the very foundation upon which the Apostles Creed is based on...the Scripture themselves?
The Apostles' Creed assumes such, based on the NT itself.
 
Christ is the word
"Word" in Jn 1:1 does not mean speech or language, it refers to the First Cause, the great Intelligence and Reason behind the universe in Greek (Gentile) philosophy, to whom John was writing.
Jesus is not referred to as the "Word of God" anywhere in the NT.
 
The Apostles' Creed assumes such, based on the NT itself.
It would have helped greatly in the Innerrancy Conferences of the late 20th Century instead of assuming such. Sometimes we miss the forest on account of the trees.
 
The apostolic church does not require scripture to know the truth
Are there two Churches? An apostolic Church that doesn't require Scripture to know the truth, and an OT Church that gave us Scripture to know the truth?
 
The main problem I see with the Creed is that it leaves out a statement concerning the very foundation upon which the Creed is based on...the Scriptures themselves! Thoughts?

Apostle Creed probably has its source in the Old Roman Creed.


What do you consider in the creed is not a reflection of Scriptures?
 
I would offer.

We do not wrestle creed against creed, flesh and blood against flesh and blood .That is simply wile of the father of lies, a serial murderer from the beginning. He hates all flesh

We do wrestle with Christ yoked with him who strengthens us, in respect to the unseen, eternal things of God

The law of interpretation.. . Christ the invisible head, in order to protect the integrity of His authoritative, living word. He teaches us I believe

Change the meaning of one word it can change the intended understanding You could say spiritual plagiarism and therefore violate the first commandment.

The word apostle sent messenger sent with beautiful feet shod with the gospel . Changed . some how into sacred highly /venerable dying mankind. making the one author Christ to no effect.

Also another loving warning found in Revelation at the end of the book of law or book of prophecy in respect to adding or subtracting from the perfect ,Both laws working as one

Deuteronomy 4:2 Ye shall not add unto the word (singular) which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it,(singular) that ye may keep the commandments(plural) of the Lord your God which I command you.

Adding to the word of God, a wile of the father of lies from the beginning the cause of the fall .

Words have meaning assigned by the author. Change the meaning of one word sent one (apostle) into highly venerated sacred dying mankind

I would think puffing up dying mankind take away Christ's upstanding. It teaches puffed up mankind through oral traditons is a higher authority than it as it is writen (sola scriptura)

Creeds interesting but no value in learning. . . . simply private interpretations as a personal commentaries every man has one .

Study all things writen in the law and prophets .It can makes it easier to spot counterfeit.

First lesson working for the Treasury. study the original it exposes the counterfeit
 
Apostle Creed probably has its source in the Old Roman Creed.


What do you consider in the creed is not a reflection of Scriptures?
The point the OP makes is about an important omission, not about an error with what is included.
 
The point the OP makes is about an important omission, not about an error with what is included.
The point the OP makes is about an important omission, not about an error with what is included.
I would offer both adding can create a omission

Matthew 15:6 And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.
 
The point the OP makes is about an important omission, not about an error with what is included.

What omission and what error? Just make the case.
 
Back
Top