thank youOh yes, of course.
thank youOh yes, of course.
All the fullness of Deity and filled with all the fullness of God are not the same thing.Also applies to other Christians.
Ephesians 3
19of the love of Christ, and to know this love that surpasses knowledge, that you may be filled with all the fullness of God.
So, according to you then, Paul is teaching the Philippians to not consider equality with God something to be grasped, because they are already in the form and equality of God? Really?Philippians 2:5 Paul said "Have the same mind as Jesus" and then immediately after that said to them that Jesus was in the form of God and that he didn't consider equality with God as something to be grasped. In this passage, Paul is isn't instructing the Philippians about how to think like God, but how to think like their Lord, Jesus Christ.
who, as He already existed in the form of God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, Phil 2:6.The "form" of God refers to the visual, outward, appearance. Paul is saying Jesus is godly, righteous, holy and wants the Philippians to emulate that. As far as considering equality with God, God doesn't need to mull over equality with Himself does He? All of this means Jesus isn't God.
Not to worry, running man will strike you without much problem.So, according to you then, Paul is teaching the Philippians to not consider equality with God something to be grasped, because they are already in the form and equality of God? Really?
who, as He already existed in the form of God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, Phil 2:6.
You see, the word in the original is subsisting because there is a comparison there between two subsistences or persons, the Father, and the Son; and therefore the Son counts it no robbery to be equal with the Father, because he subsists in the nature of God.
He has the same divine nature, the same Godhead with the Father, and all the fulness of the Godhead dwells truly, really, bodily in the Son. The Godhead dwells personally in the Son. For in Him all the fullness of Deity dwells in bodily form, Col 2:9 <--- says Paul. And you know who Col 2:9 is referring to? Of course, you do - Jesus. You see, Christ is the illustrious brightness of his Father's glory, the lively character of his Father's subsistence or person. And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power. When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high, Heb 1:3. Christ is not the character of his own subsistence, but of his Father's subsistence, and therefore the Son has a peculiar subsistence distinct from the subsistence of his Father.
Christ is the express image of his Father's person, and therefore the person of the Son is distinct from the person of the Father, for no person is the image or character of itself.
Now who strikes @grace2
he can take his time. No worries.Not to worry, running man will strike you without much problem.
It will take time because your posts are so lengthy and so many to correct.
he can take his time. No worries.
The apostolic church is scripture!What they did in Acts 17:11 is the correct approach. They didn't base it on their so-called reasoning or what they thought was logical, but what the Scripture teaches.
Sounds like he is denying the resurrection!I would think three is a crowd. Two is the witness one God has spoken .The unseen Holy Father the anointing teacher Christ displaying his power through the Son of man Jesus . The dynamic duo . Three throughout the bible represents the end of a matter.
Jesus the Christ is the same yesterday and today forever.
Not Jesus the Son of man dying mankind. His flesh returned to the dust ..
The narrow way is works, practice of the virtues of Jesus Christ and fasting, alms, prayer, stuffing for Christ’s sake not beliefsThis does not justify your spreading a false witness about triune churches are not one of the vast majority.
I am pointing out this because Jesus says to narrow the way to life and only a few find it.
The apostolic church is scripture!
2 Corinthians 3:3
Forasmuch as ye are manifestly declared to be the epistle of Christ ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart.
2 John 1:12
Having many things to write unto you, I would not write with paper and ink: but I trust to come unto you, andspeak face to face, that our joy may be full.
Acts 1:8 But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.
@grace2
If you would like to consider 1 John 5, you will see a Trinity. But let's let scripture speak, and it alone, let's avoid all carnal expressions in the discussion.
There you are with your sacred Tradition again. I stand amazed at the RCC'c blasphemies. You act against them here but your church endorses how they come to their conclusions because your church comes to their conclusion the same way, that is the Socinians and the many others like JW's and such who reject the Trinity and Christ's deity.The apostolic church is scripture!
2 Corinthians 3:3
Forasmuch as ye are manifestly declared to be the epistle of Christ ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart.
2 John 1:12
Having many things to write unto you, I would not write with paper and ink: but I trust to come unto you, andspeak face to face, that our joy may be full.
Acts 1:8 But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.
You're absolutely right. Notice how he will quote scripture like crazy when it is convenient. It always comes down to, yes its scripture but it's also Tradition. - Prima Scriptura.None of what you quoted gives an support for the RC Church.
And his own people are against him. Well, actually they are split.None of what you quoted gives an support for the RC Church.
And trine churches deny all Jesus' noble and pure teaching and suit to majority professed followers.The narrow way is works, practice of the virtues of Jesus Christ and fasting, alms, prayer, stuffing for Christ’s sake not beliefs
And his own people are against him. Well, actually they are split.
Cyril, in his book of the Trinity and person of Christ, says, that he would not speak or think anything of God but what is written in His word.
Clemens said that we ought to make good every point in question by the Word of God, because that is the surest, nay, that's the only demonstration.
The RCC is confused.