EarlyActs
Well Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2023
- Messages
- 3,179
- Reaction score
- 335
- Points
- 83
Nothing. You are being way too simplistic. You are handling a profound piece of archeology in written form. Don't handle it with a back hoe!
For proper work, you need to know: regional history
*language features (unless you know that)
*literary features (a standard tool here is BDB's literary lexicon of the OT. Unlike a dictionary without references, a lit. lexicon prints the lines including the example under discussion)
*transmission features (how did the text originate and get to the point of being written when Hebrew writing starts about 1800 BC/E?) Since that is the date of Hebrew writing, you can see that the people writing (Joseph) would use idioms from his time about that time. Joseph was in Egypt and addressed some Egyptian issues when he wrote. This must be kept in mind.
We always cross-check what we are saying so that the end-product is strong and does not crumble by being ignorant of something obvious or by over-simplifying.
Unfortunately, the early material is full of such things in very terse form, and we have a lot 'invested' in what that means. For ex., the Bab-el incident. Very few words have so much consequence.
I assume you know what terse means.
For proper work, you need to know: regional history
*language features (unless you know that)
*literary features (a standard tool here is BDB's literary lexicon of the OT. Unlike a dictionary without references, a lit. lexicon prints the lines including the example under discussion)
*transmission features (how did the text originate and get to the point of being written when Hebrew writing starts about 1800 BC/E?) Since that is the date of Hebrew writing, you can see that the people writing (Joseph) would use idioms from his time about that time. Joseph was in Egypt and addressed some Egyptian issues when he wrote. This must be kept in mind.
We always cross-check what we are saying so that the end-product is strong and does not crumble by being ignorant of something obvious or by over-simplifying.
Unfortunately, the early material is full of such things in very terse form, and we have a lot 'invested' in what that means. For ex., the Bab-el incident. Very few words have so much consequence.
I assume you know what terse means.