Red Baker
Well Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2023
- Messages
- 1,240
- Reaction score
- 517
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Easley, S.C.
- Website
- www.reddit.com
- Faith
- Member of the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven
- Country
- USA
Jim, my only point of mentioning our national election was to point out we choose one or the other. I said:But unlike the Calvinist concept of election, the election of Trump was clearly a function of who Trump was, his views, and his actions. The election of Trump was clearly about Trump as the electee. But most importantly, those who chose Trump chose him for what they thought he will do in the future.
God chose his elect solely according to his own will and purpose and for his own glory. Let us consider this point:It signifies to single out, to select, to choose, to take one and leave another.
How can God fairly judge the vessels of wrath?Or, how can fairly judge someone who is not elect?
Romans 9:19~“Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth He yet find fault? For who hath resisted His will?”
If God thus shows mercy, or hardens according to His sovereign pleasure, why, then, it may be asked, does He yet find fault with transgressors? How can he fairly judge those men who He leaves them in their sins? This is the only objection that can be made to what the Apostle was stating. Thou wilt say, then, who hath resisted His will? If God wills to create, and if He is all-powerful, and he knew what those would do whom he created, must He not be the author of sin? The thought will frequently start in the mind of some: If Divine grace is bestowed on some, and withheld from others; especially if the sins and transgressions of men are so under the control of the Almighty, that they but serve His purposes, how is it that such blame and censure attaches to the sinner, and that such dreadful judgments are denounced against him? If our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say then, is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance? This, it will be perceived, is no other than the difficulty so generally felt in attempting to reconcile the responsibility of man as a moral agent, with a pre-ordination of all events, after the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God. This pre-ordination the Apostle had asserted and proved from the Scriptures. From the Scriptures, at the same time, is evinced the complete responsibility of man as a moral agent, in the manner in which God created Adam and Eve in God’s finding fault; His remonstrances with transgressors; the declaration of their amenableness to a just judgment the manner in which the Gospel addresses them, and bewails their hardness and their impenetrable heart, unquestionably establishes this point. The proud wisdom of rebellious man indeed, almost dares to charge the oracles of God with inconsistency on this head; or, what is nearly as bad, takes upon itself either to explain away or to invalidate one part of the Scripture truth in order to establish the other, (which most do) and, in apologizing for Him before His creatures, to make God consistent with Himself! Such is the wicked presumption of man; such, we may lament to add, is the officious folly of some who mean to be the advocates of revelation; and the weak and imprudent defense of a friend is as dishonorable often as the open accusation of an enemy.