• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

Doxology

God the Son is the second person of the Trinity, the Holy Spirit is the third, both without beginning, having always proceeded from the Father.

Careful dear sister~God was not the Son, the Son was God.

Jesus was not the second person of the Trinity~Jesus was the I AM THAT I AM in his divinity as the Word in the beginning. The Word without any qualifications was God, period.

God the Son became flesh in Jesus Christ.
No, that is not correct~The Word (which was God ) became flesh as it joined himself to the tabernacle of God's son conceived in the womb by the power of the Highest.

Dear sister, there was no son in the beginning ( only in covenant ) ~Jesus was born around two thousand years ago.
 
Careful dear sister~God was not the Son, the Son was God.

Jesus was not the second person of the Trinity~Jesus was the I AM THAT I AM in his divinity as the Word in the beginning. The Word without any qualifications was God, period
No, that is not correct~The Word (which was God ) became flesh as it joined himself to the tabernacle of God's son conceived in the womb by the power of the Highest.

Dear sister, there was no son in the beginning ( only in covenant ) ~Jesus was born around two thousand years ago.
The apostle John disagrees with you.
The Word (the Son) who was with God (the Father) in the beginning was God.
Two distinct divine persons, the Son with the Father, in the one God, along with the third distinct divine person, the Holy Spirit, who is likewise God.

The Trinity is God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit, three distinct persons in one God.

Logos in Greek philosophy was the First Cause, the great Intelligence and Reason behind the universe.
John opens his gospel to his Greek audience with the astounding claim that the recently despised and crucified man, Jesus of Nazareth, is the eternal logos, source of all wisdom and power, who became flesh in order to reveal God to us.

God the Son, the logos (Jn 1:1), who proceeds from within the Father ( Jn 8:42, 16:27, 28, 17:8), as does the Holy Spirit (Jn 15:26) became flesh in Jesus of Nazareth, the Son of God (sired in the flesh by God himself).

The NT presents three distinct divine persons in the one God, demonstrated in post #14.

Feel free to show the Biblical error there.
 
Last edited:
Not to mention the NT testimony of the Trinity from the beginning:
Just got back home from a small surgery, second one in a week with one more next week and then I should be finish, at least I trust I will, we shall see. Little sore but able to answer your post.

Eleanor, we will not be far apart, but a little, with us both agreeing that Jesus was God manifest in the flesh which is absolutely essential to the truth of the teaching on the Godhead.

I would like to ask you in what sense was Jesus eternal? As God, or, as the Son of God, care to answer this? Or, in the beginning was Jesus the I AM THAT I AM? Is he the everlasting Father of all things? I'm asking these questions so that we will not talk around each other.
1) We have three distinct persons (divine agents), Father, Son and Holy Spirit,
presented in the work of salvation:
Agreed~but only in the work of redemption of God's elect as set forth in the New Covenant of grace.

a)--at its beginning (Luke 1:35),
-----at the inauguration of Jesus' public ministry (Matthew 3:16-17) and
-----in the work of atonement (Hebrews 9:14),
At the beginning of the NT? Agreed, base on the verse you provided. Also, the other two as well.

b) the Holy Spirit completing the work (salvation) of the Father through the Son
(Acts 2:38-39; Romans 8:26; 1 Corinthians 12:4-6; Ephesians 1:3-14, Ephesians 2:13-22; 2 Thessalonians 2:13; 1 Peter 1:2),
Agreed.

c) the only way to enter the kingdom of the Father (salvation) is through faith in the Son and regeneration by the Holy Spirit (John 3:1-15).
Eleanor, this is incorrect.


Our faith which is the product of the new man created within by the power of God, is at best mixed with sin because of the old man still with us.

My dear sister, we were delivered by the power of Almighty God even when we were dead in sins and respaaases, and without strength ( spiritual )! We have the forgiveness of sin by the blood of Christ ALONE, our faith though a gift from God has not one things to do with our regeneration and gift of eternal life, not one single thing. It cannot be base on our faith and the blood of Christ, or his death. It is either or. Let us not bring works in through the back door, as some Calvinist do Enough on this point~it just happened to be in the way of answering your post.

2) And Jesus shows the personhoods of three distinct divine agents:

2) And Jesus shows the personhoods of three distinct divine agents:
As far as the work of redemption, I agree.

The Son is sent by the Father, in the Father's name (John 5:23, 36, 43).
The Spirit is sent by the Father in the Son's name (John 14:26).
Agreed

The Spirit is subject to the Son as well as the Father, for the Spirit is sent by the Son as well as the Father (Jn 15:26, 16:7, 14:26).
Disagree~dear sister, The Spirit is not subject unto the Son in his humanity, no kind of way whatsoever~the burden of proof is upon you to prove this. Jesus as the Son of God is subject unto God who is a Spirit and will be throughout all eternity as far as his humanity goes!

The Trinity--one God in three distinct divine persons--is presented in NT teaching from the beginning.
I agree, yet only according to their work in bring salvation to God's elect~and making God known to us through Jesus Christ, His Son.
 
Just got back home from a small surgery, second one in a week with one more next week and then I should be finish, at least I trust I will, we shall see. Little sore but able to answer your post.

Eleanor, we will not be far apart, but a little, with us both agreeing that Jesus was God manifest in the flesh which is absolutely essential to the truth of the teaching on the Godhead.

I would like to ask you in what sense was Jesus eternal? As God, or, as the Son of God, care to answer this? Or, in the beginning was Jesus the I AM THAT I AM? Is he the everlasting Father of all things? I'm asking these questions so that we will not talk around each other.
Jesus was both God the Son and man, two natures (divine and human) in one person.

The human nature of Jesus, the Son of God, is everlasting, just as I am everlasting, I will live forever at my resurrection, just as he does at his resurrection.

The divine nature of Jesus, God the Son, eternal, without beginning and without end (Jn 1:1), who became flesh (Jn 1:14) to reveal God to us in himself (Jn 14:8-10).
Agreed~but only in the work of redemption of God's elect as set forth in the New Covenant of grace.
God is immutable. He is the same essence at all times, not one essence in redemption and another essence apart from redemption.
At the beginning of the NT? Agreed, base on the verse you provided. Also, the other two as well.
Agreed.
Eleanor, this is incorrect.
Then you don't know the NT (Jn 1:1) nor the gospel (Jn 1:14).
Our faith which is the product of the new man created within by the power of God, is at best mixed with sin because of the old man still with us.

My dear sister, we were delivered by the power of Almighty God even when we were dead in sins and respaaases, and without strength ( spiritual )! We have the forgiveness of sin by the blood of Christ ALONE, our faith though a gift from God has not one things to do with our regeneration and gift of eternal life, not one single thing. It cannot be base on our faith and the blood of Christ, or his death. It is either or. Let us not bring works in through the back door, as some Calvinist do Enough on this point~it just happened to be in the way of answering your post.
Nor did I say it did.
Faith is the result of the sovereign new birth into eternal life.
As far as the work of redemption, I agree.
As previously stated, God is immutable.
He is the same essence at all times, not one essence in redemption and another essence apart from redemption.
Agreed

Disagree~dear sister, The Spirit is not subject unto the Son in his humanity,
Nor did I say he was.
no kind of way whatsoever~the burden of proof is upon you to prove this. Jesus as the Son of God is subject unto God who is a Spirit and will be throughout all eternity as far as his humanity goes!

I agree, yet only according to their work in bring salvation to God's elect~and making God known to us through Jesus Christ, His Son.
And I repeat, God is immutable.
He is the same essence at all times, not one essence in redemption and another essence apart from redemption.

According to apostolic teaching authoritative to the church, the error regarding Jesus of Nazareth, both God the Son of eternity, without beginning and without end (Jn 1:1), as well as the everlasting Son of God in time (Jn 1:14), is yours, not mine
 
Last edited:
Eleanor~before I answer your post, I would like for you to at least answer my question to you to pinpoint exactly what you believe.

I would like to ask you in what sense was Jesus eternal? As God, or, as the Son of God, care to answer this? Or, in the beginning was Jesus the I AM THAT I AM? Is he the everlasting Father of all things? I'm asking these questions so that we will not talk around each other.
I read what you wrote above, but you never gave a direct answer

The human nature of Jesus, the Son of God, is everlasting, just as I am everlasting, I will live forever at my resurrection, just as he does at his resurrection.
That's not what I'm asking you. Is the Son of God eternal? Or, when did the Son of God begin? Or did he begin? Please give a direct answer, so that, we will not talk around each other, that's all I'm desiring at this point. I don't believe we are not far apart, but there's a disagreement.
 
Last edited:
Eleanor~before I answer your post, I would like for you to at least answer my question to you to pinpoint exactly what you believe.

I read what you wrote above, but you never gave a direct answer
There are three distinct divine persons in the Trinity, God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit, in the one God.

The second person of the Trinity, God the Son (Jn 1:1), became flesh in Jesus of Nazareth (Jn 1:14), thereby giving Jesus two natures, divine and human, in one person, who is both divine and human.
That's not what I'm asking you. Is the Son of God eternal? Or, when did the Son of God begin? Or did he begin? Please give a direct answer, so that, we will not talk around each other, that's all I'm desiring at this point. I don't believe we are not far apart, but there's a disagreement.
The eternal (without beginning or end) God the Son became
the everlasting (with beginning but without end, as are we) Son of God in Jesus the man/flesh, whose beginning was in the womb of Mary.
Nothing in his essence of Godhood changed, he simply laid aside his glory and took on the form (outward appearance) of a servant.

God the Son (Jn 1:1) became flesh (Jn 1:14) in Jesus of Nazareth, who is both fully God (God the Son) and fully man (Son of God and Mary).

And now for all eternity, the second person of the Trinity, God the Son, is a God-man--spirit and flesh (body), two natures in one person, while the first and third persons of the Trinity, God the Father and God the Holy Spirit are God--spirit only, one divine nature in both persons.
 
There are three distinct divine persons in the Trinity, God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit, in the one God.

The second person of the Trinity, God the Son (Jn 1:1), became flesh in Jesus of Nazareth (Jn 1:14), thereby giving Jesus two natures, divine and human, in one person, who is both divine and human.

The eternal (without beginning or end) God the Son became
the everlasting (with beginning but without end, as are we) Son of God in Jesus the man/flesh, whose beginning was in the womb of Mary.
Nothing in his essence of Godhood changed, he simply laid aside his glory and took on the form (outward appearance) of a servant.

God the Son (Jn 1:1) became flesh (Jn 1:14) in Jesus of Nazareth, who is both fully God (God the Son) and fully man (Son of God and Mary).

And now for all eternity, the second person of the Trinity, God the Son, is a God-man--spirit and flesh (body), two natures in one person, while the first and third persons of the Trinity, God the Father and God the Holy Spirit are God--spirit only, one divine nature in both persons.
Let me show you where the disagreement is between us, and where we agree, and why I separate you from those who totally reject Jesus being God manifest in human flesh, the only God we shall ever see. One can be a child of God and not have a clear understanding of this doctrine, but one cannot reject the deity of the Son of God and be of God.
In no particular order as you spoke, but in order as to help everyone see clearly our discussion. Our discussion, at least from me, is to help God's people to see more clearly the distinction in the Godhead and to protect Jesus' deity as the I AM THAT I AM, Jehovah God, that was revealed to Moses, to where we see JESUS ~ who is the express image of the invisible God in a human body.

And now for all eternity, the second person of the Trinity, God the Son, is a God-man--spirit and flesh (body), two natures in one person, while the first and third persons of the Trinity, God the Father and God the Holy Spirit are God--spirit only, one divine nature in both persons.
I agree, with one exception~Jesus is not the second person of the Trinity~that's a man made doctrine/saying/teaching. Jesus is the everlasting father ( Isaiah 9:6 ) ~ Alpha and Omega, the first and the last without qualifications, in his deity as God.

The second person of the Trinity, God the Son (Jn 1:1), became flesh in Jesus of Nazareth (Jn 1:14), thereby giving Jesus two natures, divine and human, in one person, who is both divine and human.
To speak of Jesus as God the Son before he he was born a son is a self contradiction. Please consider:

The Eternal Sonship ( Which is basically what you are teaching ) is a dogma that is discredited logically by self contradiction. To contend that Jesus was eternally begotten ( Or, was God the Son ) is a manifest contradiction of term. We ask: can an object begin and not begun? No. The saying within itself is most absurd. Why do not people consider this, and understand it? Acts 28:25-27 is the answer.

Please consider carefully: Eternity is that which has no beginning, nor stands in reference to time~Son supposes time, generation, and father; time is also antecedent to such generation~therefore, the conjunction of the two terms: Son and eternity ( or Son before he became a Son )~is absolutely impossible as they imply different and opposite ideal. Words must have meaning, or else, how can we communicate with each other on a level where we can understand each other? I understand eternity and I also understand the word son, and so do my readers, and we should know how to use each word properly, without confusing the meaning of either.

If Jesus Christ be the eternal Son of God of the Godhead, or if he was eternally begotten/generated, according to his Divine nature, then he CAN NOT be the Eternal God that inhabiteth eternity. Jesus was a Son only in covenant, and in no other way.

The reason why is this: "son" implies a father; and father in reference to a son, precedency in time, if not in nature as well. Father and son imply the ideal of generation~generation implies a time, in which it was effected, and time is also antecedent to such generation.

We know that Jesus Christ was both God that inhabiteth eternity and the Son of God that had a beginning when he was conceived by the Holy Ghost! In between that, there was no Son of God. So, why say that the Son of God was the seconf person of the Trinity, when the scriptures do not say that?

The eternal Sonship position is against the witness of God himself concerning his Son.

The incarnate Sonship protects the Deity of the Son of God, and confesses that he is both the I am that I am, and the Son of God and the Son of man.
The second person of the Trinity, God the Son (Jn 1:1), became flesh in Jesus of Nazareth (Jn 1:14), thereby giving Jesus two natures, divine and human, in one person, who is both divine and human.
The scriptures do not say what you are saying~it was not God the Son that became flesh, it was the Word which was God that became flesh. huge difference.

You accused me of not understanding John 1:1; John 1:14; and not understanding the gospel, yet it is you that needs to be instructed to see clearer. If you had said: "The Word (Jn 1:1), became flesh in Jesus of Nazareth (Jn 1:14), thereby giving Jesus two natures, divine and human, in one person, who is both divine and human." Then I would fully agree, because that's what the scriptures teach us.
The eternal (without beginning or end) God the Son became
Again, that is a self contradiction~you cannot be eternal and be a Son! Or, words have no meaning, and we have lost the means of communicating with each other. Again, read my notes above.

I may go back and see if I need to answer anything from you other post~if I have missed something just point it out and I will address it. We are not far apart btw, and I think you know that to be so.
 
Let me show you where the disagreement is between us, and where we agree, and why I separate you from those who totally reject Jesus being God manifest in human flesh, the only God we shall ever see. One can be a child of God and not have a clear understanding of this doctrine, but one cannot reject the deity of the Son of God and be of God.
In no particular order as you spoke, but in order as to help everyone see clearly our discussion. Our discussion, at least from me, is to help God's people to see more clearly the distinction in the Godhead and to protect Jesus' deity as the I AM THAT I AM, Jehovah God, that was revealed to Moses, to where we see JESUS ~ who is the express image of the invisible God in a human body.


I agree, with one exception~Jesus is not the second person of the Trinity~that's a man made doctrine/saying/teaching. Jesus is the everlasting father ( Isaiah 9:6 ) ~ Alpha and Omega, the first and the last without qualifications, in his deity as God.


To speak of Jesus as God the Son before he he was born a son is a self contradiction. Please consider:

The Eternal Sonship ( Which is basically what you are teaching ) is a dogma that is discredited logically by self contradiction. To contend that Jesus was eternally begotten ( Or, was God the Son ) is a manifest contradiction of term. We ask: can an object begin and not begun? No. The saying within itself is most absurd. Why do not people consider this, and understand it? Acts 28:25-27 is the answer.

Please consider carefully: Eternity is that which has no beginning, nor stands in reference to time~Son supposes time, generation, and father; time is also antecedent to such generation~therefore, the conjunction of the two terms: Son and eternity ( or Son before he became a Son )~is absolutely impossible as they imply different and opposite ideal. Words must have meaning, or else, how can we communicate with each other on a level where we can understand each other? I understand eternity and I also understand the word son, and so do my readers, and we should know how to use each word properly, without confusing the meaning of either.

If Jesus Christ be the eternal Son of God of the Godhead, or if he was eternally begotten/generated, according to his Divine nature, then he CAN NOT be the Eternal God that inhabiteth eternity. Jesus was a Son only in covenant, and in no other way.

The reason why is this: "son" implies a father; and father in reference to a son, precedency in time, if not in nature as well. Father and son imply the ideal of generation~generation implies a time, in which it was effected, and time is also antecedent to such generation.

We know that Jesus Christ was both God that inhabiteth eternity and the Son of God that had a beginning when he was conceived by the Holy Ghost! In between that, there was no Son of God. So, why say that the Son of God was the seconf person of the Trinity, when the scriptures do not say that?

The eternal Sonship position is against the witness of God himself concerning his Son.

The incarnate Sonship protects the Deity of the Son of God, and confesses that he is both the I am that I am, and the Son of God and the Son of man.

The scriptures do not say what you are saying~it was not God the Son that became flesh, it was the Word which was God that became flesh. huge difference.

You accused me of not understanding John 1:1; John 1:14; and not understanding the gospel, yet it is you that needs to be instructed to see clearer. If you had said: "The Word (Jn 1:1), became flesh in Jesus of Nazareth (Jn 1:14), thereby giving Jesus two natures, divine and human, in one person, who is both divine and human." Then I would fully agree, because that's what the scriptures teach us.

Again, that is a self contradiction~you cannot be eternal and be a Son! Or, words have no meaning, and we have lost the means of communicating with each other. Again, read my notes above.

I may go back and see if I need to answer anything from you other post~if I have missed something just point it out and I will address it. We are not far apart btw, and I think you know that to be so.
I think I understand what you are saying, and pretty sure it may be accurate, though I am still pondering what the ultimate conclusion would as it relates to the Trinity---a triune God. Does what you are saying deny the historical dichotomy of God as triune with Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as distinct "persons" within the Godhead---or God? But doing so without denying the deity of Jesus or the Holy Spirit.

Obviously John's use of logos or "word" in John 1 refers to Christ's position and activity before His incarnation, when He became known as the Son---or God the Son. Does not the use of the "Word" to describe not only the eternality of the One who came as the Son, Jesus, "In the beginning was the word" but also His distinction "and the Word was with God." The Word being the sole means by which any reality comes into existence.

I would also be interested to know how you view the the deity of the Holy Spirit.
 
Let me show you where the disagreement is between us, and where we agree, and why I separate you from those who totally reject Jesus being God manifest in human flesh, the only God we shall ever see. One can be a child of God and not have a clear understanding of this doctrine, but one cannot reject the deity of the Son of God and be of God.
It's amazing if you think that I do.

The second person of the divine Trinity, God the Son,
became flesh in Jesus, the Son of God, who was both God and man, with two natures, divine and human, in one person.
Messiah was the divine God the Son, the second person of the divine Trinity, who took on human flesh through Mary, making him the God-man of Jesus of Nazareth.

That is the orthodox trinitarian doctrine of historical Christianity, which Trinity you deny.
 
It's amazing if you think that I do.
I think you misunderstood what I said to you Eleanor~I did not say that you deny the deity of the Son of God, but did say that you do not have a clear understanding. On this I know you do not. We both believe and teach the deity of Jesus Christ, what I said that I disagree with you is your next statement.

The second person of the divine Trinity, God the Son,
Jesus Christ is not he second person of the Godhead, he is the IAM THAT I AM, period! God was not the Son! Jesus, was the Son of the eternal God! To use the phrase ~ God the Son is unscriptural. When we speak we must speak as thus saith the Lord God.

Why did not not comment on:
To speak of Jesus as God the Son before he he was born a son is a self contradiction. Please consider:

The Eternal Sonship ( Which is basically what you are teaching ) is a dogma that is discredited logically by self contradiction. To contend that Jesus was eternally begotten ( Or, was God the Son ) is a manifest contradiction of term. We ask: can an object begin and not begun? No. The saying within itself is most absurd. Why do not people consider this, and understand it? Acts 28:25-27 is the answer.

Please consider carefully: Eternity is that which has no beginning, nor stands in reference to time~Son supposes time, generation, and father; time is also antecedent to such generation~therefore, the conjunction of the two terms: Son and eternity ( or Son before he became a Son )~is absolutely impossible as they imply different and opposite ideal. Words must have meaning, or else, how can we communicate with each other on a level where we can understand each other? I understand eternity and I also understand the word son, and so do my readers, and we should know how to use each word properly, without confusing the meaning of either.

If Jesus Christ be the eternal Son of God of the Godhead, or if he was eternally begotten/generated, according to his Divine nature, then he CAN NOT be the Eternal God that inhabiteth eternity. Jesus was a Son only in covenant, and in no other way.

The reason why is this: "son" implies a father; and father in reference to a son, precedency in time, if not in nature as well. Father and son imply the ideal of generation~generation implies a time, in which it was effected, and time is also antecedent to such generation.

As I pointed out:

To speak of Jesus as God the Son before he he was born a son is a self contradiction
But that does not stop you from doing so~why?
became flesh in Jesus, the Son of God,
The Son did not, the Word did! The I AM THAT I AM! The One God that said: let there be light, and it was! All things were created by and for him and he was before all things and by him all things consist, and he will be the end of all things! He is the Alpha and the Omega the Almighty! God was manifest in the flesh, as he joined the tabernacle of the Son of God, yet
who he was........The eternal Spirit of God, eternal, both ways.

That is the orthodox trinitarian doctrine of historical Christianity
That's very close to the Nicene Creed of the RCC.

which Trinity you deny

which Trinity you deny.
Yes! I do not believe in a eternal begotten god with the Son proceeding from the Father and the Holy Spirit proceeding from the Son.

I believe in one God,
the Father almighty,
maker of heaven and earth,
of all things visible and invisible.

I believe in one Lord Jesus Christ,
the Only Begotten Son of God,
born of the Father before all ages.
God from God, Light from Light,
true God from true God,
begotten, not made, consubstantial with the Father;
through him all things were made.
For us men and for our salvation
he came down from heaven,
and by the Holy Spirit was incarnate of the Virgin Mary,
and became man.
For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate,
he suffered death and was buried,
and rose again on the third day
in accordance with the Scriptures.
He ascended into heaven
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again in glory
to judge the living and the dead
and his kingdom will have no end.

I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life,
who proceeds from the Father and the Son,
who with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified,
who has spoken through the prophets.
This verbiage is pure heresy, which no child of God should ever embrace!
 
I think you misunderstood what I said to you Eleanor~I did not say that you deny the deity of the Son of God, but did say that you do not have a clear understanding. On this I know you do not. We both believe and teach the deity of Jesus Christ, what I said that I disagree with you is your next statement.
Jesus Christ is not he second person of the Godhead,
The second person of the Trinity, God the Son, became flesh (in the man Jesus of Nazareth).

That is historical orthodox Christianity.
 
Last edited:
This verbiage is pure heresy, which no child of God should ever embrace!I
Then you do not know the Scriptures, nor do you agree with historical orthodox Christianity.
the Only Begotten Son of God,
born of the Father before all ages.
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the word was God (Jn 1:1). The word became flesh (Jn 1:14) .

Before Abraham was, I AM. (Jn 8:48-49).
God from God, Light from Light,
true God from true God,
begotten, not made, consubstantial with the Father;
through him all things were made.
For us men and for our salvation
he came down from heaven,
I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me. (Jn 6:38, 41-42, 50, 62).
and by the Holy Spirit was incarnate of the Virgin Mary,
and became man.
For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate,
he suffered death and was buried,
and rose again on the third day
in accordance with the Scriptures.
He ascended into heaven
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again in glory
to judge the living and the dead
and his kingdom will have no end.
I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life,
who proceeds from the Father and the Son,
who with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified,
who has spoken through the prophets.
. . .I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of Truth who goes out from the Father (Jn 15:26)

In Rev 22:1, the river of the water of life (Holy Spirit, Rev 22:17) which proceeds from within (ekporueoenon) the throne of God (the Father) and the Lamb (God the Son), are a figure of the Holy Spirit proceeding from within God the Father and God the Son.
 
The second person of the Trinity, God the Son, became flesh (in the man Jesus of Nazareth).

That is historical orthodox Christianity.
Eleanor, you continually using that unscriptural phrase will never make it scriptural.

Again, the word of God does not reveal that Jesus is the second person of the Trinity~you are allowing a Roman Catholic Creeds speak through you and all you are doing is parroting their teachings~and then pronounce anathema upon those who reject "God the Son~proceeding from God from eternity past", which is in essence Eleanor, is to deny Jesus' Deity as the I AM THAT I AM. I do not believe this is something you want to do, yet, if you consider carefully what you are saying then in essence you should see you are guilty.

Part one....
 
Above you told me I do not understand John 1:1 ~ so let us consider briefly that verse and test each understanding with the word of God.

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."​

"In the beginning"~John goes back to eternity and very high to the existence of the eternal God.

Beginning~The point of time at which anything begins; absolute, the time when the universe began to be. That in which anything has its rise, or in which its origin is embodied; origin, source, fount. It is a powerful and profound word, taking us back to a time before any time.

"Was the Word"~Eleanore please note: the Spirit’s word ~ the Word, not the Son, was in the beginning with God.

In the beginning, before time, in eternity, there existed the eternal Word of God. The God of the Bible, Jehovah, is the self-existent God, I AM THAT I AM. He inhabits eternity, from everlasting to everlasting (Isaiah 57:15; Ps 90:2)). This Word is immediately identified as God and also as Him (John 1:1,3-4).

Mark the God He was with the Father, and He is the Father in His nature. What more does a person need to know that the Word here is Jehovah God? Further, since the context moving forward is clearly about God’s Son, Jesus is Jehovah God!

Let us consider the English word – word – and its context here and elsewhere.
  1. Word. I. Speech, utterance, verbal expression. Things said, or something said; speech, talk, discourse, utterance; report, tidings, news, information. An element of speech. A combination of vocal sounds, or one such sound, used in a language to express an idea and constituting an ultimate minimal element of speech having a meaning as such. [OED]. By its context, consider how the Word of God is a declaration or revelation. The heavens, part of all things, declares the glory of God (Jn 1:3; Ps 19:1-6). The Word of God is the light of men by the eternal life He gives (Jn 1:4-5). He was the true Light that lights every man coming into the world (Jn 1:9). He was incarnated in man’s flesh for men to see; He revealed God (Jn 1:14). He brought grace and truth, totally unlike the word Moses brought (Jn 1:17) No man has ever seen God, but the incarnate Word declared Him (Jn 1:18). The eternal life with the Father, the Word of life, was manifested (I Jn 1:2).
The Word of God, with human nature as Jesus Christ, revealed God the Father. Jesus said no man could know the Father but by His revelation (Matt 11:27). Jesus came to give men an understanding (the Word) of God (I John 5:20).

"And the Word was with God"~Eleanor, please note: the Holy Spirit’s choice of words – the Word, not the Son, was with God.

John’s second descriptive fact to learn about the Word is that He was with God. The first descriptive fact about the Word was that He was in the beginning. The third descriptive fact, also contained in this verse, is that He was God. The fourth descriptive fact, in the next verse, is He was with God in eternity. The fifth descriptive fact, the third verse, is that the Word created all things.

We understand these five descriptive facts to teach certain general attributes. First, by the first phrase of 1:1, we understand the Word’s eternal ( not begotten or proceeding from another ) existence. Second, by the next phrase, we understand He is a distinct Godhead person. Third, by the third phrase, we know He is God like the God He was with. Fourth, by the second verse, we know He was eternal like God He was with. Fifth, by the third verse, we know He is uncreated and Creator of all things. The Word of God, as God, yet with God and distinct from God, is the Trinity. We know the Word of God is God by looking ahead to the third phrase. If the Word of God was God and also was with God, then there is plurality. Since there is only one God, then there must be plural Persons (Deut 6:4). Christianity is a monotheistic religion as much as monotheism can be defined. Monotheism. The doctrine or belief that there is only one God. [OED].

There is only one God. Period. There can only be one totally Supreme Being. This is self-evident if we define and describe God as the Supreme Being. The scriptures declare it clearly (Deut 6:4; Isaiah 43:10; 44:6,8; I Cor 8:4-6). God is eternal in both directions without end (Deut 33:27; Ps 90:2; Is 57:15).

Our God is self-existent, self-subsistent, infinitely independent (Exodus 3:14).

Before this revelation, I AM THAT I AM, He was Almighty God (Ex 6:3).

There is no difference in nature between these three Persons in the Godhead. The nature of God is the attributes that makes Him distinctly God (Gal 4:8). When three are said to be one (I Jn 5:7), they are one in essence and nature. All three are credited with creation (Job 33:4; John 1:1; Heb 1:3; Rev 4:11). All three are credited with regeneration (I Pet 3:3; 1:23; John 5:25; Tit 3:5). All three are credited with resurrection (Gal 1:1; Rom 1:4; John 10:18).

The Nicene Creed (RCC) and its adoring followers hold to a heretical trinity. The Bible has all three Persons without any distinction at all in their nature.

The Bible knows nothing of “God of God” and similar human speculations. The Bible does not know a begotten god, turning the trinity into paganism.

They are named for their "given roles in creation or especially in our redemption". They did not need names for each other; they were part of the same nature. Their names are for us; their names do not alter their absolute equality.

God is not Father of the Word; the Word does not declare Him to the Spirit


Part two.....
 
"The Word was God"~Eleanor please note: the Holy Spirit’s clear use of words – the doctrine is simple: Word = God.

The Holy Spirit did not say … the Son was God, as eternal sonship heretics. The Holy Spirit did not say … the Word was a god, as Russellites imagine. The Holy Spirit did not say … the Word was a begotten God, as the RCC.

John’s third descriptive fact to learn about the Word is that the Word was God.

First, by the first phrase of 1:1, we understand the Word’s eternal existence. Second, by the next phrase, we understand He is a distinct Godhead person. Third, by the third phrase, we know He is God identical to God He was with. Fourth, by the second verse, we know He was eternal like God He was with. Fifth, by the third verse, we know He is uncreated and Creator of all things.

The Word of God, as God, is perfect deity fully equal to the God He was with.

Not only was the Word of God with God, but He was Himself God as well.

If the Word of God was God, then He is not a God or a begotten God, etc.

Since there is only one God, then there must be plural Persons (Deut. 6:4) As far as the work of redemption for the elect.

Jesus Christ is fully God; the scriptures confirm this important doctrine plainly.

Prophecy and reality of Jesus is Immanuel – God with us (Is 7:14; Mat 1:23). Prophecy declared Him the Mighty God and Everlasting Father (Isaiah 9:6). The great mystery of true Christians is God manifest in the flesh (I Ti 3:16). Messianic Psalm 45 declared Jesus to be God and King (Heb 1:8; Ps 45:6-7). Paul declared and warned the full Godhead was in Jesus’ body (Col 2:8-9). Jesus declared to the Jews that before Abraham was, I am (John 8:58-59). Thomas, an apostle, who should know best, called Him God (John 20:28). The blessed hope of the believer is the appearing of the great God (Tit 2:13). Jesus said that to have seen Him was to have seen the Father (John 14:9).

Part three...
 
Eleanor, you continually using that unscriptural phrase will never make it scriptural.
Non-responsive to my post #34, above.
Again, the word of God does not reveal that Jesus is the second person of the Trinity~you are allowing a Roman Catholic Creeds speak through you and all you are doing is parroting their teachings~and then pronounce anathema upon those who reject "God the Son~proceeding from God from eternity past", which is in essence Eleanor, is to deny Jesus' Deity as the I AM THAT I AM. I do not believe this is something you want to do, yet, if you consider carefully what you are saying then in essence you should see you are guilty.

Part one....
Feel free to address the Scriptures presented in my post #34, above
 
Non-responsive to my post #34, above.

Feel free to address the Scriptures presented in my post #34, above
Eleanor, I feel the same concerning you on my post #29, plus more above on John 1:1.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the word was God (Jn 1:1). The word became flesh (Jn 1:14) .

Before Abraham was, I AM. (Jn 8:48-49).
See post #36 37

Concerning John 8:48,49,~Jesus was God in his Deity as the I AM THAT I AM. He was the God that called Abraham out from his father's house alone. Isaiah 51:2 He was known unto ABraham has the Almighty God.
I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me. (Jn 6:38, 41-42, 50, 62).
He did as the Word that was in the beginning. God was manifest in the flesh~1st Timothy 3:16. Jesus Christ is the true God and eternal life 1st John 5:20, the only God you and I will ever see.

. . .I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of Truth who goes out from the Father (Jn 15:26)
Which proceedeth from the Father~

These words do not have anything at all in any respect whatsoever to eternal procession.

The Nicene Creed, by groupies of Origen and stooges of Constantine, invented this damnable heresy to fit the square truth of scripture into the round hole of Gnosticism. They made the Word of God a begotten god; they made the Spirit a proceeding god. They claim their formula defines and defends the Trinity, but it rather destroys it. The Word and the Spirit are equally God in every respect as the Father was or is.

If you are not familiar with the RCC heresy … https://ccel.org/creeds/nicene.creed.html.

If you are not familiar with the RCC heresy … https://reformed.org/documents/wcf_with_proofs/.

You may find the Westminster Confession of heresy in the Trinity Hymnal (#850).

The 1689 Baptists copied the Westminster, but they pulled eternal from proceeding!

The Holy Spirit proceeded from the Father only in the plan of salvation for human grasp.

Jesus Christ as Redeemer received the gift of God’s personal presence for the church.

This promised gift was given by the Father to Christ, Who in turn gave it to men.

The Bible is clear about this procession (John 7:37-39; Acts 2:33; John 14:16-17,26-27; 15:26-27; 16:7; Acts 1:4-5,8; 8:14-19; 10:43-48; 11:15-18; 15:7-9; 19:1-16; Luke 24:49; Joel 2:28-29; Zechariah 12:10; Galatians 3:14; Rom 8:14-17,23; etc.).
 
Eleanor, I feel the same concerning you on my post #29, plus more above on John 1:1.
Your assertion in post #29 was already addressed in my post #22.
See post #36 37

Concerning John 8:48,49,~Jesus was God in his Deity as the I AM THAT I AM. He was the God that called Abraham out from his father's house alone. Isaiah 51:2 He was known unto ABraham has the Almighty God.

He did as the Word that was in the beginning. God was manifest in the flesh~1st Timothy 3:16. Jesus Christ is the true God and eternal life 1st John 5:20, the only God you and I will ever see.
None of which shows that the Scriptures I presented in post #34, demonstrating certain phrases in the Nicene Creed to which you objected, do not support those phrases.
Which proceedeth from the Father~

These words do not have anything at all in any respect whatsoever to eternal procession.
Contraire. . .

That is the precise meaning meant by eternal procession in the Nicene Creed.

You have not shown that Scripture does not support those phrases in the Nicene Creed to which you object.
 
Back
Top