D
Deleted member 6
Guest
All we can go by is their profession. But their life will be their testimony.Haha
Professed?
All we can go by is their profession. But their life will be their testimony.Haha
Professed?
But your meaning Christianized?All we can go by is their profession. But their life will be their testimony.
What exactly are you driving at, if I may ask?But your meaning Christianized?
Was that rhetorical? Sounds like a valid criticism of Dispensationalism, not what Carbon and David are saying.So, the church loses out in the end. She has failed her mission to make disciples of (not in) all the nations. Christ has to come and rescue his defeated bride, who lost out to Satan.
Your conversation reminded me of this clip.Uh...
Was that rhetorical? Sounds like a valid criticism of Dispensationalism, not what Carbon and David are saying.
@Carbon , @David1701 , there was a time when the gospel was localized to the Mediterranean. Then only to Europe and the near east. Most of the world at that time was not Christian. Even in our contemporary, post-postmodern setting where Christianity may not be as predominant as it was a century or two ago, it is still hugely more pervasive than during the Reformation, the Schism, the ECFs. We, for the first time in human history, can measure the world from a position of former pervasiveness and theological and scientific advancement previously unknown to humanity. There was a time when slavery and child sex-trading was the norm. There was a time when men went out to wage war every spring. There was a time when doctors thought it was a good thing to blood-let and spontaneous generation was the rule of thought.
You want to play questions?What exactly are you driving at, if I may ask?
And the clip is?Your conversation reminded me of this clip.
Are you saying you can't see the clip?And the clip is?
Which clip? How can I see what I don’t know what it is?Are you saying you can't see the clip?
Isn't it obvious?Which clip? How can I see what I don’t know what it is?
What, you want to play questions?Isn't it obvious?
They are going ground and may be gaining ground, but they are NOT anywhere near the magnitude in frequency, severity or duration of ancient times and the chief reason for that is the gospel.Except it isn't.
All of these things are still ongoing. And, believe it or not, gaining ground. Except the bloodletting. That's just creepy and weird.
They are going ground and may be gaining ground, but they are NOT anywhere near the magnitude in frequency, severity or duration of ancient times and the chief reason for that is the gospel.
Let me suggest a good book ( again ). It's relatively short and cheap.Let me also suggest a concept to everyone germane ot this op: apocalypse. The Dispensationalists are BIG on this. They believe -actively embracing eagerly looking forward to - the world is and will go to hell in a handbasket any day now. The Church will not prevail over the gates of hell on this side of the rapture; it will become increasingly impotent and need rescue. The Church will need rescue, not the earth.
In the secular arena we have the exact same belief system dressed up in pagan "mother-earthism," and reported to us as "population explosion", "global warming," and "climate change," etc. In other words, the depraved of the world also think the world is going to go to hell in a handbasket any day now and there's nothing we can do about it. The secular messiah (government) will have to come rescue the earth.
If Genesis 1:27 and Matthew 22:20 are true and to be taken as written, then what we observe and experience now is simply and solely a temporary condition and it has no bearing on God's already-decided timing regarding Christ's return.
I'd also like to float another concept by everyone: the premise of The Second Coming. There's no such thing is scripture. The phrase doesn't exist.
We are told Jesus will come "A" second time, but there's nothing in the Bible that states that "second time" is the last time.
Furthermore, The Hebrews 9 text explicitly states that coming "again" will be for "salvation without reference to sin," "salvation apart from sin." This is important because both the Dispensational rapture and millennial reign returns have everything to do with sin. The same is true of the Amil and Postmil view of Jesus coming to gather everyone for the final judgment. The author of Hebrews makes that statement after having state humans live once and then face judgment.
I wouldn't be surprised if Satan has his boot on the neck of the church so that Christ would have to come to rescue her.They are going ground and may be gaining ground, but they are NOT anywhere near the magnitude in frequency, severity or duration of ancient times and the chief reason for that is the gospel.
Let me also suggest a concept to everyone germane ot this op: apocalypse. The Dispensationalists are BIG on this. They believe -actively embracing eagerly looking forward to - the world is and will go to hell in a handbasket any day now. The Church will not prevail over the gates of hell on this side of the rapture; it will become increasingly impotent and need rescue. The Church will need rescue, not the earth.
In the secular arena we have the exact same belief system dressed up in pagan "mother-earthism," and reported to us as "population explosion", "global warming," and "climate change," etc. In other words, the depraved of the world also think the world is going to go to hell in a handbasket any day now and there's nothing we can do about it. The secular messiah (government) will have to come rescue the earth.
If Genesis 1:27 and Matthew 22:20 are true and to be taken as written, then what we observe and experience now is simply and solely a temporary condition and it has no bearing on God's already-decided timing regarding Christ's return.
<<<<<<<<<<< >>>>>>>>>>>>
I'd also like to float another concept by everyone: the premise of The Second Coming. There's no such thing is scripture. The phrase doesn't exist. We are told Jesus will come "A" second time, but there's nothing in the Bible that states that "second time" is the last time. Furthermore, The Hebrews 9 text explicitly states that coming "again" will be for "salvation without reference to sin," "salvation apart from sin." This is important because both the Dispensational rapture and millennial reign returns have everything to do with sin. The same is true of the Amil and Postmil view of Jesus coming to gather everyone for the final judgment. The author of Hebrews makes that statement after having state humans live once and then face judgment.
He surely would if God allowed him too.I wouldn't be surprised if Satan has his boot on the neck of the church so that Christ would have to come to rescue her.
The gospel has definitely spread much further since the earliest days, which is not surprising.Was that rhetorical? Sounds like a valid criticism of Dispensationalism, not what Carbon and David are saying.
@Carbon , @David1701 , there was a time when the gospel was localized to the Mediterranean. Then only to Europe and the near east. Most of the world at that time was not Christian. Even in our contemporary, post-postmodern setting where Christianity may not be as predominant as it was a century or two ago, it is still hugely more pervasive than during the Reformation, the Schism, the ECFs. We, for the first time in human history, can measure the world from a position of former pervasiveness and theological and scientific advancement previously unknown to humanity. There was a time when slavery and child sex-trading was the norm. There was a time when men went out to wage war every spring. There was a time when doctors thought it was a good thing to blood-let and spontaneous generation was the rule of thought.