To keep things simple I avoid the definition of the salvific content of faith that saves people before Christ. This information, though of interest, is not needed for the point I was making ... that point being that a 1282 N.A. Indian is doomed to hell as faith cometh by hearing and that Indian never heard the salvific gospel. Aside: Yeah, there is anecdotal evidence of VERY rare exceptions.
True ... and they all go to hell as we are saved by FAITH ALONE. No ones works are sufficient Rom 3:10 As it is written: “There is no one righteous, not even one.
Yeah, the 1282 N.A. Indian and all others without exception who never heard of Christ are judged by their works and go to hell. Rom 3:10 As it is written: “There is no one righteous, not even one.
You believe in WORKS salvation as an another method to merit heaven. I don't. We both claim the bible backs us up. Their are plenty of verses saying one must know of Christ to be saved.
- John 17:3 And this is eternal life, that they know you the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.
- John 12:48 Whoever rejects Me and refuses to accept My teachings, has one who judges him; the very word that I spoke will judge and condemn him on the last day.
- John 3:18 Whoever believes and has decided to trust in Him [as personal Savior and Lord] is not judged [for this one, there is no judgment, no rejection, no condemnation]; but the one who does not believe [and has decided to reject Him as personal Savior and Lord] is judged already [that one has been convicted and sentenced], because he has not believed and trusted in the name of the [One and] only begotten Son of God [the One who is truly unique, the only One of His kind, the One who alone can save him].
Inclusivism depreciates the Trinity. This depreciates the Incarnation, depreciates the work and atonement of Christ, denies the uniqueness of the Bible, denies the necessity of gospel truth, substitutes the same old philosophical junk about the 'universal logos' at work in all religious systems. John MacArthur
Given the following hypothetical:
1282 N.A. Indian does the required works needed for salvation per your definition ... then a missionary tells the Indian about Christ. The Indian does not believe the missionary.
Question 1: Is the Indian still saved by his works (give scripture)?
Question 2: if you answered "NO" I ask .... should missionaries be trained to see if someone is first saved by their works and if so, should they not tell that person about Christ because the person is already saved and telling him about Christ could lead to the loss of his salvation?