NoAre you saying your question did not intend an implication or insinuation?
Its by asking questions that we can learn about each other’s beliefs and gain understanding!
Understanding is one of the gifts of the spirit! Btw
NoAre you saying your question did not intend an implication or insinuation?
Turn it around
How does believing the perpetual virginity keep you from salvation?
Truth is immutable! Not rubber!... rubber goalposts...
Jesus was conceived pure and immaculate because Mary was pure and immaculate. As Job said “Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? There is not one.” (Job 14:4).First you say Christ's, then you sound like it has to be both. Make up your mind.
If Mary was born in sin, how does that mean necessarily that she passed that "gene", "DNA", "curse" or whatever it is that seems to be passed from father to son, that renders him also sinful, to Christ? It doesn't.
Mary, like the rest of us, was born in sin. If you want Mary to be born of a virgin, then to maintain the logic of your doctrine, you will have to find virgins all the way back to the bottom turtle.
Since Gen 3:15 I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel.First you say Christ's, then you sound like it has to be both. Make up your mind.
If Mary was born in sin, how does that mean necessarily that she passed that "gene", "DNA", "curse" or whatever it is that seems to be passed from father to son, that renders him also sinful, to Christ? It doesn't.
Mary, like the rest of us, was born in sin. If you want Mary to be born of a virgin, then to maintain the logic of your doctrine, you will have to find virgins all the way back to the bottom turtle.
Did a "clean" Mary come from an "unclean" Anne?Jesus was conceived pure and immaculate because Mary was pure and immaculate. As Job said “Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? There is not one.” (Job 14:4).
The immaculate conception and the miraculous conception of Jesus by the Holy Spirit are the same thing. It is miraculous for a virgin (immaculate)to conceive. It is Catholicism that has changed, without any Biblical authority, the meaning of "immaculate" to refer to perpetual virginity, not only of Mary, but also her mother, grandmother, gr grandmother----all the way back to Eve----who as far as I know not even Catholicism claims of Eve. Even if they do it denies the Bible that says "and Adam knew Eve and she bore a son."The “things” plural are the immaculate conception of Mary and the miraculous conception of Jesus by the Holy Spirit!
How was she conceived without sin unless her mother was also without sin and Mary was an immaculate conception also? You are relating loss of virginity to sin. And if that were the case, God never would have given the command to be fruitfull and multiply and fill the earth.Mary was conceived without sin and was sinless to be the mother of God!
Are you gonna defend any more f these claims or accusations?The Scriptures Reject Mary’s Immaculate Conception
- Catholics readily admit that there is no direct or categorical proof in the Scriptures of this dogma.
- Despite the corrupt rendering of Genesis 3:15 by the Douay Version, Jesus Himself defeated Satan.
- Despite Luke 1:28 being corrupted by the Confraternity Version, only Jesus Christ is full of grace.
- Jesus was conceived immaculately by lacking a human father (Romans 5:12), but not Mary.
- Mary acknowledged her need of a Saviour as much as any man (Luke 1:46-47 cp Romans 3:23).
- Mary thought her estate at the visitation to be low, surely not sinless perfection before God.
- She knew that it was due to her bearing Christ she would be blessed, not her own conception.
- Why did Mary give a sin offering to be purified, if she was immaculate (Lev 12:8; Luke 2:21-24)?
- If Mary was conceived and remained immaculate, why did God pay her the wages of sin in death?
The Scriptures Reject Mary’s Assumption into Heaven
- The argument of silence requires that Scripture does not teach what it does not teach, especially here.
- Enoch and Elijah were transported to heaven, but Scripture plainly records the facts for us.
- Catholics themselves realize they have no Scriptural evidence whatsoever, yet it is infallible dogma.
The Effects of Mariolatry are Abominable
- Remember the influence the Mother Church’s sacraments have had on Protestants and Baptists.
- The first mention of Mariolatry in Scripture is by a silly woman – another Eve (Luke 11:27-28).
- Exalting a woman obviously appeals to women, thus the captivity of silly women (II Timothy 3:6).
- False religion is maintained by superstitious control over women; Rome is not different at all.
- As was Eve, women are more susceptible to deceitful lies (I Timothy 2:11-14; I Peter 3:7).
- Silly. Deserving of pity, compassion, or sympathy. Helpless. Defenseless; esp. of women and children. Weak, feeble, frail; insignificant, trifling. Unlearned, unsophisticated, simple, rustic, ignorant. Weak or deficient in intellect; feeble-minded, imbecile. Lacking in judgment or common sense; foolish, senseless, empty-headed.
- Mary is presented to Catholic girls and women as the great epitome of a godly Christian woman.
- What image comes to mind when you visualize Mary – is it Scriptural? No, it is Catholic!
- Compare the bold and courageous Mary to the gaudily dressed fragile doll of Rome.
- Why do you revolt at the thought of sweat, dirt, labor, and sex, let alone anger, sin, etc.?
- She is a pretty, serene, and sweet mannequin lacking a mind, judgment, and independence.
- Where is the hardworking, intelligent, and efficient virtuous woman of Proverbs 31:10-31?
- They follow her false humility and servility to provide the mindless religious devotees for Rome.
- Rome keeps her women – silly women – in such fear they remain amazed for life (I Pet 3:6).
- Believing it to be rebellious to think, they are the most gullible and naïve of all women.
- Believing drudgery and burdens a blessing, they provide many children and free labor.
- They follow her false freedom from sexual “defilement” to vows of celibacy as nuns.
- So-called Protestants are not saved from the influence of this gross perversion of womanhood.
- Let us pray and work to form some Jaels, Ruths, Abigails, Priscillas, and even some Marys, but not after the Catholic model of a mindless zombie in a “spiritual” trance with a halo.
The Hail Mary Prayer
“Hail Mary, full of grace! The Lord is with thee; blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus. Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death. Amen. (Indulgence of 300 days; Rac #691).
The Hail Holy Queen Prayer
“Hail, Holy Queen, Mother of Mercy; hail, our life, our sweetness, and our hope! To thee do we cry, poor banished children of Eve; to thee do we send up our sighs, mourning and weeping in this vale of tears. Turn, then, most gracious advocate, thine eyes of mercy toward us; and after this our exile, show unto us the blessed fruit of thy womb, Jesus. O clement, O loving, O sweet Virgin Mary! (Indulgence of 5 years. Rac #332).
The Memorare
“Remember, O most gracious Virgin Mary, that never was it known that any one who fled to thy protection, implored thy help, and sought thy intercession, was left unaided. Inspired with this confidence, I fly unto thee, O Virgin of virgins, my Mother! To thee I come, before thee I stand, sinful and sorrowful. O Mother of the Word Incarnate, despise not my petitions, but, in thy mercy, hear and answer me. Amen. (Indulgence of 3 years. Rac #339).
Conclusion: Mel Gibson’s movie is introducing and catechizing American Baptists and Protestants to Rome’s Mariolatry.
Written by a friend of mine~J. R. Crosby
- How much is Mel a Mariolater? Read the opening quote in the “Introduction.” And consider that he has recently blessed his only daughter, 21-year-old Hannah, to become a nun! Compare to I Timothy 4:1-3!
- Bible Christians will not have anything to do with his movie, and they will earnestly contend against it.
- Let us thank the Lord for the faithful martyrs that went before us, and let us live worthy of these witnesses.
How can we arrive at understanding if we don’t have the same terms or definitions?That is not even what I said. I said the immaculate conception was preserving Jesus from original sin, not Mary as you said. And I said original sin is an expression of the results of Adam's sin being passed to all his progeny (all of humanity) in their nature as sinners.
You are going to have to explain what you mean by that.
Preserved from what?
Since when has blessed meant remaining a perpetual virgin? SInce when are sexual relations between a husband and wife sin?
Since when has blessed meant perpetual virginity? Since when has blessed meant to be adored or in the case of the Catholics, (though they deny such is the case, worshiped. My gosh. statues are made of her and knelt before and prayed to.)
In your own words---what was told to her, and were those things performed?
By what authority was luther a reformer, he was not a successor of the apostles and only they possess the authority of Jesus Christ!Do the healthy need medicine?
I think that the intentions of Martin Luther were not mistaken. He was a reformer. Perhaps some methods were not correct. But in that time, if we read the story of the Pastor, a German Lutheran who then converted when he saw reality – he became Catholic – in that time, the Church was not exactly a model to imitate. There was corruption in the Church, there was worldliness, attachment to money, to power…and this he protested. Then he was intelligent and took some steps forward justifying, and because he did this. And today Lutherans and Catholics, Protestants, all of us agree on the doctrine of justification. On this point, which is very important, he did not err. He made a medicine for the Church…
-Pope Francis
Please show scripture for #2 in bold.How can we arrive at understanding if we don’t have the same terms or definitions?
There are different doctrines discussed here and you are confusing them
There are two conceptions that we are discussing
1) The miraculous conception of Jesus by the Holy Spirit!
2) The immaculate conception of Mary being preserved from original sin by the power of God in virtue of the merits of Jesus Christ!
I never said sexual relations between a husband and wife is a sin, it is of divine origin and the means of procreation
I just said Mary is blessed, i did not involve the perpetual virginity
No adoration no worship of Mary
Only God may be lawfully worshiped
Do you worship / adore your bed when you kneel to say your prayers at night? No vos worship requires intent!
“In your own words---what was told to her, and were those things performed?”
What do you mean by this or what is it in reference too?
Thanks
Where does scripture authorize a reformation?Do the healthy need medicine?
I think that the intentions of Martin Luther were not mistaken. He was a reformer. Perhaps some methods were not correct. But in that time, if we read the story of the Pastor, a German Lutheran who then converted when he saw reality – he became Catholic – in that time, the Church was not exactly a model to imitate. There was corruption in the Church, there was worldliness, attachment to money, to power…and this he protested. Then he was intelligent and took some steps forward justifying, and because he did this. And today Lutherans and Catholics, Protestants, all of us agree on the doctrine of justification. On this point, which is very important, he did not err. He made a medicine for the Church…
-Pope Francis
The question was is who?Did a "clean" Mary come from an "unclean" Anne?
We can't come to an agreement. I understand your definitions of those terms perfectly and I am pretty sure you understand mine. In any case I gave my definitions. The question is, which one is actually biblical---yours or mine? The only place we can find a definitive answer to that is from the Bible itself. So does the Bible actually say what you say using your definitions, or is it your religion that is defining those terms?How can we arrive at understanding if we don’t have the same terms or definitions?
I am not confusing anything and it is not doctrines that are being discussed, it is definitions of words that are defining the doctrines put forth. I both gave my definition and understanding of two things---keeping those two things separate.There are different doctrines discussed here and you are confusing them
Sorry for the confusion, you right original sin is in reference to the immaculate conception of mary not her perpetual virginity
Two things. Immaculate conception and what it is. Original sin and what it is. No confusing of the two. Just clarifying two incorrect definitions you made.That is not even what I said. I said the immaculate conception was preserving Jesus from original sin, not Mary as you said. And I said original sin is an expression of the results of Adam's sin being passed to all his progeny (all of humanity) in their nature as sinners.
We were not discussing that---that is something we both agree on.1) The miraculous conception of Jesus by the Holy Spirit!
I have already informed you that the immaculate conception of Mary preserved her from original sin on the merits of Christ is not what the immaculate conception did. It preserved Jesus from original sin. Mary was already born in original sin.2) The immaculate conception of Mary being preserved from original sin by the power of God in virtue of the merits of Jesus Christ!
At least twice you have used the scripture of Mary being blessed as proof of her perpetual virginity.I just said Mary is blessed, i did not involve the perpetual virginity
Note the parenthetical statement in my post that states this is exactly what the Catholics claim. It is no different than a Unitarian claiming they worship Jesus, because we are told to, and at the same time they do not worship him as God.No adoration no worship of Mary
Only God may be lawfully worshiped
My bed is not a statue of a woman. If the intent in Mary veneration and praying to her is not worship---why the graven image? It at the very least, puts a dead human as a mediator between you and the mediator. Which is also idolatry.Do you worship / adore your bed when you kneel to say your prayers at night? No vos worship requires intent!
“In your own words---what was told to her, and were those things performed?”
What do you mean by this or what is it in reference too?
Lk 1:45 And blessed is she that believed: for there shall be a performance of those things which were told her from the Lord.
Same in your understandingThe immaculate conception and the miraculous conception of Jesus by the Holy Spirit are the same thing. It is miraculous for a virgin (immaculate)to conceive. It is Catholicism that has changed, without any Biblical authority, the meaning of "immaculate" to refer to perpetual virginity, not only of Mary, but also her mother, grandmother, gr grandmother----all the way back to Eve----who as far as I know not even Catholicism claims of Eve. Even if they do it denies the Bible that says "and Adam knew Eve and she bore a son."
How was she conceived without sin unless her mother was also without sin and Mary was an immaculate conception also? You are relating loss of virginity to sin. And if that were the case, God never would have given the command to be fruitfull and multiply and fill the earth.
i quoted a PopeBy what authority was luther a reformer, he was not a successor of the apostles and only they possess the authority of Jesus Christ!
Sound like “faith alone”?Do the healthy need medicine?
I think that the intentions of Martin Luther were not mistaken. He was a reformer. Perhaps some methods were not correct. But in that time, if we read the story of the Pastor, a German Lutheran who then converted when he saw reality – he became Catholic – in that time, the Church was not exactly a model to imitate. There was corruption in the Church, there was worldliness, attachment to money, to power…and this he protested. Then he was intelligent and took some steps forward justifying, and because he did this. And today Lutherans and Catholics, Protestants, all of us agree on the doctrine of justification. On this point, which is very important, he did not err. He made a medicine for the Church…
-Pope Francis
We do not agree on the doctrine of justification, never! The sola’s are heresy condemned by the authority of Christ in holy apostolic council, you don’t believe the bible much less justification!
If anyone says a man mat be justified by “faith alone” let him be anathema!