Dave_Regenerated
Junior
- Joined
- May 27, 2023
- Messages
- 662
- Reaction score
- 272
- Points
- 63
OH I see, because I don't have a picture but a D. I guess you missed the point I made then.I don't know what that is or what that means. Can you explain please?

OH I see, because I don't have a picture but a D. I guess you missed the point I made then.I don't know what that is or what that means. Can you explain please?
He is presenting the spiritual death in which we are born and remain until the new birthThat’s your way of understanding .....which I have already explained to you...it’s not a big deal.
I don’t need to understand.
Being birthed in the Spirit is life and freedom from sin....an act that only God can perform.
Flesh gives birth to flesh.
Spirit gives birth to spirit.
My way of understanding God’s word .
So what's hiding behind the big D?OH I see, because I don't have a picture but a D. I guess you missed the point I made then.
@Eleanor said:I actually thought that was a avatar of @fastfredy0 ....![]()
Thing about it is that it's hard not to think of them looking that way.

Pretty muchSounds like
positional = justification,
progressive = sanctification,
ultimate = glorification.
It has something to do with your criticism of Fast's avatar. That is your clue, and no more needs to be said about it.I don't know what that is or what that means. Can you explain please?
Why would I be a legalistic Christian according to you?
I have no earthly idea. Secular comedy is for secular people, not Christians. It really beats me why you would indulge it if you are claiming to be born again.
Without realizing it...Personally I have the most issues with both limited Atonement and Total Depravity.
I have 3 Sons...none are Born Again....I pray they become Born Again....if it’s not the will of God, then there isn’t much I can do about it is there?
Apart from praying.......God is the one who chooses his children. we don’t....I don’t believe we have any say in the matter..putting it ver simply.
I NEVER chose God to birth me in the Spirit.....he uses me though, for his purposes and he certainly uses me to spread the word and Glorify His Name and his Name only......
Taking one possible meaning and eliminating all the rest, becomes a drag.Draw in what way? Salvation? Judgement?
I'm sure you understand the word "drawing" often has a meaning of being "dragged".
YES!View attachment 397And this is me. I'm the one on the right.
I never had an issue with a Doctrine of Grace. If a Doctrine is Biblical, you just can't wish it were any different...Is there any of the doctrines of grace (TULIP) that you did at one time, or maybe still do have issues with?
One you just can’t settle with or wish there was a way around it.
Have you tried and tested it in hopes to prove it wrong?
This question(s) is mainly for Calvinists but of course Arminians are welcome to answer and discuss as well.
I never had an issue with a Doctrine of Grace. If a Doctrine is Biblical, you just can't wish it were any different...
Hey @civic ...I liked reading your post...if I have any questions, can I ask you?
If I don’t understand, I will also ask what it means...hope that’s ok, I have much to learn...
The answer is, the reason God gives Totally Depraved Reprobates over to themselves; is because of the power of the Gospel, not because of any power in the Man...Originally Posted by @Civic
If man is totally depraved, cannot seek God, cannot think a right though about God, cannot know truth as the "T" in tulip infers, then why did God have to say 3 times He had to give these unbelieving reprobates over ?
Seems to me the Arminian constantly appeals to sentiment and human emotion. Calvinists rely more on hard logic and a systematic approach to theology. All in all, limited (particular) atonement is a hard pill to swallow but free will / decision theology is even harder.Personally I have the most issues with both limited Atonement and Total Depravity.
I have spent literally 7 years trying to get around or even prove Limited Atonement non biblical. As of late, I have added Total Depravity to the list.
I also believe the five are in perfect harmony with each other. If you remove just one of the 5 points, the whole system collapses.
I think also, it is so much easier to accept the Arminian 5 points. After all, their belief of total depravity (different than Calvinism) can be conformed to agree with unlimited (universal) atonement. Since it is an inconsistent system with scripture it makes it much easier to accept (humanly speaking) the doctrines since they are not in harmony with scripture.
I agree.Seems to me the Arminian constantly appeals to sentiment and human emotion. Calvinists rely more on hard logic and a systematic approach to theology. All in all, limited (particular) atonement is a hard pill to swallow but free will / decision theology is even harder.
I think 'free will / decision theology' is easier to swallow (not that I believe it). The default for mankind is to think they are independent of God even if they are Christians. It's not like you can prove with empirical evidence that God exists let alone prove God is the First Cause.All in all, limited (particular) atonement is a hard pill to swallow but free will / decision theology is even harder.