What exactly is it that you think I am saying that makes you post this to me, as though I do not know what imputation is?
Arial: "
And all men are condemned by Adam's sin as all meet death even before the Mosaic covenant Law was given."
---------------------
You say "we are sinners because we sin" but above you imply it was the act of sin by which we are sinners. You're saying two opposing positions.
That's why I ask.
The Doctrine of Imputation is not referring to "
acts" of sin but the sin nature Adam and the woman were created with. They were created sinful, or as the word sin [harmatia] is defined, "
missing the mark."
What is that "
mark" they missed?
The glory of God.
There was nothing deific about them. They possessed no Deific Nature of God nor any Deific Attributes of God. This means they were created
fall[
en] short of the glory of God.
The word is "sin."
What the Doctrine of Imputation is as described in 2 Cr. 5:21 is a "
nature swap" not an "
act" swap.
Christ takes our sinful
nature and we take His Righteous
Nature.
If He was taking only our "
acts" of sin then one of the things that happened to Him on the cross wouldn't have happened, and that is His separation from His Father and His cry "
My God, My God, why hast thou forsaken me"?
God has been long-suffering with Israel's sin and disobedience for a long, long time - as well as the sin and disobedience of Gentile Christians.
Christ didn't die for our "
acts" of sin, as a sinless man He was imputed our sin
nature. That's what killed Him. "Acts" of sin wouldn't kill Him, but if He was to take our sin nature as a sinless man then that would definitely kill Him and cause a breach with His Father.