• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

A Question for the Calvinist

Sorry but I do not let Calvinism be my guide for scripture.
There is no reason to be sorry for that; it's good not to let any system be your guide.
I do not believe for one second that scripture teaches that God wanted to be the puppet master of mankind instead of wanting a genuine responsive and trusting relationship of love from mankind.
That's good, you dont believe that, and neither do Calvinists.
 
Sorry but I do not let Calvinism be my guide for scripture.
I do not believe for one second that scripture teaches that God wanted to be the puppet master of mankind instead of wanting a genuine responsive and trusting relationship of love from mankind.
Calvinism does not teach that God is a puppetmaster. But if you think mankind works on equal moral footing with God, you've got a perverse worldview and a perverse Gospel, that ignores God's absolute sovereignty and right over all creation.

Calvinism may be attended to by some for the sake of that worldview. But that is not its intent. Its intent is to describe Scriptural principle more accurately than the other points-of-view. And if you think that your worldview is more accurate, you have yet to defeat, Scripturally, the scriptural and logical reasoning that God alone is the first cause of all other things, and that all things besides himself came as a result of HIM being their first cause. They do not exist in and of themselves, as God does.
 
I'm no Calvinist, but I would add that, according to most Calvinists, God did not love them and therefore did not give them any chance at all to have faith, belief, repentance, etc.
Let's remember that God does not change, lest we be destroyed. God's Love can't grow or change; it can't begin or end. I myself have never heard a Calvinist say God has, at any time, not Loved them. God loves people differently over time; he now calls us a Friend, Son and Bride. None of this changes God...
 
Nah.
God is not limited when it was His own decision to not do what He wanted to do due to mankind's choices made.
Example:
Matthew 23​
(37) Jerusalem, Jerusalem! Your people have killed the prophets and have stoned the messengers who were sent to you. I have often wanted to gather your people, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings. But you wouldn't let me.​
Calvinism is True; but the other side is True as well. Jesus is God, and He wanted to Save these Reprobates...

Both sides; True Compatibalism...
 
Last edited:
Calvinism is True; but the other side is True as well. Jesus is God, and He wanted to Save these Reprobates...

Both sides; True Compatibalism...
Both can’t be true. Calvinism and Arminianism that is.
Theologically both cannot be true.
 
Calvinism is True; but the other side is True as well. Jesus is God, and He wanted to Save these Reprobates...

Both sides; True Compatibalism...
That's true, but not THE Truth. That is, I can't help but note that some will read it to claim "both sides" are two sides of The Truth. They are not. The truth is what it is, and all we can do to arrange our notions around it are only approaches, not definitions nor valid descriptions. WE are the ones who are off. The Truth does not arrange itself to us.
 
That's true, but not THE Truth. That is, I can't help but note that some will read it to claim "both sides" are two sides of The Truth. They are not. The truth is what it is, and all we can do to arrange our notions around it are only approaches, not definitions nor valid descriptions. WE are the ones who are off. The Truth does not arrange itself to us.
That's it...
 
Since not all Calvinists believe the same, what would you say a "true Calvinist" believes?
A true Calvinist believes in the Doctrines of Grace, and in the 5-Solas. Which means they believe Sola Fide is as True as Sola Gratia. When Calvinists believe in Sola Fide, we might say a true Calvinist may think 'Faith Alone' is even more important than 'Grace Alone'. Something we classify as an 'Only', has to be of upmost importance. Non Calvinists look at Calvinists as having only one Sola; IE Grace Alone. That's all we talk about, right? If Faith Alone is not in a Calvinist's list of Solas, the Calvinist leans Hyper...

The trick to debating Calvinism, is to force Us to talk about our belief in Faith Alone...
 
Calvinism is True; but the other side is True as well. Jesus is God, and He wanted to Save these Reprobates...

Both sides; True Compatibalism...
Actually He doesnt want to save the reprobates, they are the vessels of wrath fitted for destruction. In fact His making them for destruction was one of the means He purposed to show Grace to the Elect Rom 9:21-23

21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

22 What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction:

23 And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,

Eph 2:7

7 That in the ages to come he might shew the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness toward us[The elect] through Christ Jesus.
 
Actually He doesnt want to save the reprobates, they are the vessels of wrath fitted for destruction. In fact His making them for destruction was one of the means He purposed to show Grace to the Elect Rom 9:21-23

21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

22 What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction:

23 And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,

Eph 2:7

7 That in the ages to come he might shew the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness toward us[The elect] through Christ Jesus.
They were Vessels Unconditionally fitted for Wrath and Destruction, yes; thanks for the admission. But Jesus Christ in his Humanity longed to gather them under his Wings; and he is God. This desire wasn't a Sin, and had to be his Hypostatic desire...

You agree they are Reprobates. The Lord God Jesus Christ wanted to gather even them...

Isn't it the Truth that it was the Will of the Logos of God to Save these Reprobates?
 
Last edited:
They were Vessels Unconditionally fitted for Wrath and Destruction, yes; thanks for the admission. But Jesus Christ in his Humanity longed to gather them under his Wings; and he is God. This desire wasn't a Sin, and had to be his Hypostatic desire...

You agree they are Reprobates. The Lord God Jesus Christ wanted to gather even them...

Isn't it the Truth that it was the Will of the Logos of God to Save these Reprobates?
Sounds a bit vague. His will? Do you mean, his wish?
 
Sounds a bit vague. His will? Do you mean, his wish?
That's probably right. Since he Kept the Law to Love his Neighbor, it would at least be his wish. Being his wish, it would be his Desire. Being his Desire, it would be his Will if they were...

Willing...
 
They were Vessels Unconditionally fitted for Wrath and Destruction, yes; thanks for the admission. But Jesus Christ in his Humanity longed to gather them under his Wings; and he is God. This desire wasn't a Sin, and had to be his Hypostatic desire...

You agree they are Reprobates. The Lord God Jesus Christ wanted to gather even them...

Isn't it the Truth that it was the Will of the Logos of God to Save these Reprobates?
Here is a clip on this that you may enjoy. It will help from the Reformed perspective.

Jesus’ lament shows us that human suffering, considered in itself, does not please the Almighty. Although God has ordained Jerusalem’s destruction, His revealed will in Scripture proves He has “no pleasure in the death of the wicked (Ezek. 33:11). But, as John Calvin writes, “the will of God is exhibited to us in two ways,” and there is a sovereign will, unrevealed to us, that governs all that ever occurs (Deut. 29:29). By this hidden will God may ordain events that by themselves do not please Him but nonetheless contribute to His glory, which is supremely pleasing to Him (Isa. 48:9–11). God finds pleasure not in the suffering, but in the good He works for His glory through the suffering.


 
Don't understand what --what I said? Or what?

The word usage is what I am uncertain about, but do see how it can accurately be said. I would simply not choose that wording myself, but I'm not set in stone either. Willing to see where the errors in my thinking might be
 
Here is a clip on this that you may enjoy. It will help from the Reformed perspective.

Jesus’ lament shows us that human suffering, considered in itself, does not please the Almighty. Although God has ordained Jerusalem’s destruction, His revealed will in Scripture proves He has “no pleasure in the death of the wicked (Ezek. 33:11). But, as John Calvin writes, “the will of God is exhibited to us in two ways,” and there is a sovereign will, unrevealed to us, that governs all that ever occurs (Deut. 29:29). By this hidden will God may ordain events that by themselves do not please Him but nonetheless contribute to His glory, which is supremely pleasing to Him (Isa. 48:9–11). God finds pleasure not in the suffering, but in the good He works for His glory through the suffering.


This is why both sides have some truth...
 
Back
Top