• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

Why Did God Plan for the Fall of Man?

Why take yours?

Do you see the problem??
Apparently, you are not listening to me telling you not to even take my word for it but seek confirmation from the Lord Jesus Christ for He is to be your personal Good Shepherd and not me or anyone else. That is why we, individually, are to prove all things by Him & His words.
 
Because God, in HIS wisdom appointed teachers. Anyone who thinks they can pick up a Bible and simply read it to understand what it all means without reference to culture, history or language is a chump. What you are saying is no different to what the Latter Day Saints say. God may as well be a "Wendy and sprinkle fairy dust on us all and we can all fly away to heaven". :p ;) :D

Ephesians 4:11
And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers,
There are false apostles and false teachers too.

Ephesians 4:11 And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; 12 For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: 13 Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ: 14 That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive; 15 But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ:

So how does on discern between the two? By proving everything they say by His words since each of us is to be relying on Jesus Christ as our personal Good Shepherd & Friend to help us to follow Him daily.

James 1:5 If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him. 6 But let him ask in faith, nothing wavering. For he that wavereth is like a wave of the sea driven with the wind and tossed. 7 For let not that man think that he shall receive any thing of the Lord. 8 A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.

1 John 2:20 But ye have an unction from the Holy One, and ye know all things. 21 I have not written unto you because ye know not the truth, but because ye know it, and that no lie is of the truth....

26 These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you. 27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
28 And now, little children, abide in him; that, when he shall appear, we may have confidence, and not be ashamed before him at his coming.

Evolution theory says there is no Biblical global flood but Jesus says there was per Luke 17:26-37 and even added the judgment on Sodom & Gomorrah as another historical reference point for taking His warning as serious to be ready to leave at any given moment ( by His help ) or else.

Peter confirms there was a Biblical global flood as a warning of the coming fiery judgment on the earth that believers were to escape from at the pre great tribulation rapture event in 2 Peter 3:1-15 as Jesus confirmed this also in Luke 12:40-49

So let every man in the evolution theory be called a liar ( or deceived ) and let God be true.
 
The first day is the day he revealed himself to mankind. God is light it revealed the darkness . the temporal corruption timekeepers (Sun and Moon) leading to the last day under the Sun. Time is running out .
Hard to understand what you mean per your comment.

God did not reveal Himself to mankind on the first day when mankind was created the 6th day.

There was no death, nor temporal corruption because there was no sun nor moon nor stars until the fourth day and mankind had not fallen yet to bring sin into the world and into creation and thus death by sin in the world and in creation.

When Jesus was incarnated as the Son of Man and born into the world, He is the light that shown in that darkness that was present in the world.
 
But not a tail like a cedar which is a tree which to me, testify to the size and thus the length of the tail.

Job 40:17 He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together.

Why only mention a brontosaurus?

Think of the T-Rex! Job should be screamed about if T-Rex were living with men of this creation!

And... What about the Raptors? And, all the flesh eating creatures of the prehistoric creation?

Yet? To you? :unsure:

Job only saw fit to mention a huge herbivore? One that has a swishing tail like a cedar?

Its funny.....
 
Why take yours?

Do you see the problem??
You cannot see yours?

Go to Jesus and trust him as your Good Shepherd or rely on your favorite teacher or church to be your shepherd, but they will not always be good for why you are to prove all things by Him.

1 Thessalonians 5:21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. 22 Abstain from all appearance of evil.

23 And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. 24 Faithful is he that calleth you, who also will do it.

25 Brethren, pray for us.

1 Corinthians 3:5 Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man? 6 I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase. 7 So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.
 
You cannot see yours?

Go to Jesus and trust him as your Good Shepherd or rely on your favorite teacher or church to be your shepherd, but they will not always be good for why you are to prove all things by Him.

1 Thessalonians 5:21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. 22 Abstain from all appearance of evil.

23 And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. 24 Faithful is he that calleth you, who also will do it.

25 Brethren, pray for us.

1 Corinthians 3:5 Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man? 6 I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase. 7 So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.
Hey! God wrote the Bible to ONLY YOU! Humble you.
 
Apparently, you are not listening to me telling you not to even take my word for it...
The problem must be me, right? I cannot possibly have understood you were including yourself in the repeatedly other-poster-ragging insinuations because I'm not listening in a text-based medium.

I am listening.

THE ENTIRE DIGRESSION IS A RED HERRING THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS OP AND EVERYONE SINGLE ONE OF YOU SHOULD GET BACK ON TOPIC!

Was that loud enough or should I make the text larger, or maybe accuse you of not listening?
 
The problem must be me, right? I cannot possibly have understood you were including yourself in the repeatedly other-poster-ragging insinuations because I'm not listening in a text-based medium.

I am listening.

THE ENTIRE DIGRESSION IS A RED HERRING THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS OP AND EVERYONE SINGLE ONE OF YOU SHOULD GET BACK ON TOPIC!

Was that loud enough or should I make the text larger, or maybe accuse you of not listening?
Write it in Shakespearean English.... I think will communicate to him.
 
The problem must be me, right? I cannot possibly have understood you were including yourself in the repeatedly other-poster-ragging insinuations because I'm not listening in a text-based medium.

I am listening.

THE ENTIRE DIGRESSION IS A RED HERRING THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS OP AND EVERYONE SINGLE ONE OF YOU SHOULD GET BACK ON TOPIC!

Was that loud enough or should I make the text larger, or maybe accuse you of not listening?
Get back in your lane.
 
Get back in your lane.
Tell the other guy(s). They've been insinuating their own special insights over one another in and out of several pages and there's not an op-relevant word since the bottom half Post #446 (that is two dozen posts and only one singled out).
 
Tell the other guy(s). They've been insinuating their own special insights over one another in and out of several pages and there's not an op-relevant word since the bottom half Post #446 (that is two dozen posts and only one singled out).
I no longer see the words, "Staff Member," below your name.

That lane!
 
Tell the other guy(s). They've been insinuating their own special insights over one another in and out of several pages and there's not an op-relevant word since the bottom half Post #446 (that is two dozen posts and only one singled out).
Is that any of your business?
 
There are false apostles and false teachers too.
So? You would throw out the fact that God has appointed teachers to teach the body of Christ? Instead you would rely on yourself to determine what is right even though, if they are doing their job as unto the Lord, they have been equipped and gifted by the Lord God Himself to dig out the treasures that are hidden in the scriptures. James said not many of you should become teachers (Jm.3:1) but your version is no-one should be teachers because we don't need them.

Hope I'm not in ear shot when you tell the Lord He messed up by appointing teachers on the Big Day. ;)

So how does on discern between the two? By proving everything they say by His words since each of us is to be relying on Jesus Christ as our personal Good Shepherd & Friend to help us to follow Him daily.
Do you even see how that looks? (based on your understanding)

You sit there in prayer and an idea of what the scripture means comes into your head. It must be the Spirit because, according to you, that is how it works. Now how do you prove the idea is indeed the truth because your source/method is always in the same manner?

At least if my pastor says something I can verify it against other teachers of God's word as well as all the academic teaching of the various disciplines.

The only word you have is your word it is God's word. This is exactly what they do who start cults. They have a "revelation" and it aligns with a few scriptures they know and suddenly they have a whole religion going. They ignore other relevant scriptures (like God appointing teachers) to justify their ignorance and persistence in wrong doing.

I can only pray you will have the eyes of your heart enlightened. 🙏
 
I no longer see the words, "Staff Member," below your name.

That lane!
It has nothing to do with my being or not being a staff member.
Is that any of your business?
Yes......

.....and you two are adding to the problem to be solved!

What is the subject of this op? The title says we're supposed to be discussing the answer to the question, "Why did God plan for the fall of man?"


Because if the subject of this thread is not who has been more especially endowed with insight from God and who's better than others then maybe we could all get back on topic.


Which of these comments (or questions) is op-relevant?

  • Young earth creationists will not be able to follow what I have to say unless they are willing to drop their bias.
  • There you go... Shut closed and slammed tight.
  • Are you ready for possible answers, or wanting to shoot everything down?
  • Is that how you test things? Or, to keep anything you do not understand, out?
  • Do you have the needed knowledge with understanding of doctrine if I do? My vote is that you don't.
  • And seem to have a surplus of shot gun shells laying a round that you have nothing better to do with.
  • You do not give me the impression that would I want to dialogue with you unless the sheriff is in the crowd.
  • Then you know better than to make this discussion about you OR me (or any poster). I could be the most knowledgeable person in the entire history of humanity and my questions still be valid, veracious, and warrant op-relevant answers. I could, alternatively, be the person most ignorant on this topic who has ever lived, and these comments and inquiries would still be valid, veracious, and warrant topical responses.
  • If some would calm down here...
  • I think I found what was confusing you. You must be confusing __________________________
  • Now if you cannot see this? Fine. Others will see it.
  • You ask for chapter and verse to spell it out for you? So you do not have to think and figure out what is needed? Here is the problem. I can not solve it for you. You can only solve it by gaining more and more knowledge for yourself before all else.
  • I can recommend a good teacher that can teach you more knowledge than you would know what to do with unless that knowledge is needed for an answer to a problem. But? Do you want it? Its free for the asking. That is God's way of raising up a genuine teacher.
  • The holes you speak of may simply be truths you have not yet learned to be able to be thinking with.
  • It takes gaining more and more knowledge of God's Word. Gained for the love of learning God's Word.
  • We need to overcome our deficiency preventing insight by gaining more and more knowledge.
  • You are asking the wrong god. You want God with a big "G". It's a common mistake.
  • Why are you afraid to let me talk?
  • The better question is why are you afraid to talk about the op and keep every word you post about the op?
  • The very thing that gets me into trouble with some who want what was discerned by insight to have its own chapter to show the insight. Then the term "speculation" is bantered about and the insight is lost to the one who needed to consider.
  • Do you have insight as to why she added to the command? There is a reason for me asking that. For I believe its been the major area of why somethings I say causes the negative reaction I have been getting.
  • You did not like what I said. Understood.
  • You are just not following.
  • You got to get yourself out of that box of only speak about "God."


Which one's were necessary to prove the op (or any alternative)? How many are not ad hominem in nature (blatant, implied, or insinuated)?


Those are from just the first five pages. A couple of them are mine :(. I could max out two, maybe three more posts with more. There are at least two occasions where the thread got off track for more than an entire page before this current occasion. Lest anyone get the wrong impression, I'm not judging anyone; I'm making some objective observations and asking you to consider them for yourselves because comments like, "Funny how I was reading it as is with His help, while you guys were going off to commentaries and education of others for reading His words," and "Hey! God wrote the Bible to ONLY YOU! Humble you," do not help anyone prove their position. It is well within my "lane" to observe what all can see. Anyone who doesn't like it can comment according or ignore it but only one of those two options will help get the thread back on topic.


But maybe I misunderstand. If this is what everyone wants, then just say so because I can post non sequitur and fallacy ad nauseam and take this thread far afield :cautious:. In fact, if this sort of nonsense is going to be allowed by all then maybe I'll do something like this in all the threads. Just let me know. ;)
 
Why did God plan for the fall?

GeneZ,

It's your op. (Re-)State your thesis and summarize your position succinctly (in a few sentences). Those who've offered alternatives do the same. Try keeping any and all mentions of others out because it's not necessary to mention yourselves or others when keeping the posts about the posts and not the posters.

Recapture the thread.
 
Why did God plan for the fall?

GeneZ,

It's your op. (Re-)State your thesis and summarize your position succinctly (in a few sentences). Those who've offered alternatives do the same. Try keeping any and all mentions of others out because it's not necessary to mention yourselves or others when keeping the posts about the posts and not the posters.

Recapture the thread.
Sir.... You start your own thread... You can even cop the Title with a slight modification to differentiate.

And, then, you show us how its to be done.



Just to let you know why I refused your original request..

I would have gladly clarified with more, but your approach became unnecessarily too obtrusive to continue with you.
 
Before our world was created on the face of this earth. Before anyone was born of Adam and the Woman? Even before Adam and the woman existed?

God already planned for the Fall of Man. Of course God is omniscient and knew man would fall. The question I have God gave the green light to have man fall?
God didn't plan for the Fall, and yes, he knew it would happen, as Jesus stated in Luke 14:28 about building a house: "For which of you, intending to build a tower, does not sit down first and count the cost, whether he has enough to finish it." Of course counting the cost is more than just finances. When building, you look at every facet, make sure there aren't any flaws, and if there are flaws, you make sure to fix it.

When God created man, He could have created them as robots, to do His will without question, instead he created them with free will. And here's where "counting the cost" comes in. He knew that creating free will, whether it be angelic or human that the possibility of abusing free will was there. How would he fix that?

You know, I can tell my child, "Don't touch the stove, it's hot, you'll get burned and it'll hurt." But a five-year-old doesn't understand "hot" "burn" "hurt". And you can't be around forever to shield them from such harm. The best way to learn is: experience. So you let them touch the hot stove, it burns, there's pain and they cry as a result. The4y have learned their lessons. Unfortunately, the scars are there, as a reminder.

God created Adam with free will, he chose to disobey and as a result "through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned" (Romans 5:12) Adam lived 930 years (Genesis 5:3) he lived to see the errors of his ways.

For the past 7,000 years, the world has known sin, the only way we can understand it. This is the age old question: Why Does God Permit Evil? God has allowed man to try their best in governing themselves, and they have failed, only bringing more sorrow and death. But His Kingdom will fix it all.
 
It has nothing to do with my being or not being a staff member.

Yes......

.....and you two are adding to the problem to be solved!

What is the subject of this op? The title says we're supposed to be discussing the answer to the question, "Why did God plan for the fall of man?"


Because if the subject of this thread is not who has been more especially endowed with insight from God and who's better than others then maybe we could all get back on topic.


Which of these comments (or questions) is op-relevant?

  • Young earth creationists will not be able to follow what I have to say unless they are willing to drop their bias.
  • There you go... Shut closed and slammed tight.
  • Are you ready for possible answers, or wanting to shoot everything down?
  • Is that how you test things? Or, to keep anything you do not understand, out?
  • Do you have the needed knowledge with understanding of doctrine if I do? My vote is that you don't.
  • And seem to have a surplus of shot gun shells laying a round that you have nothing better to do with.
  • You do not give me the impression that would I want to dialogue with you unless the sheriff is in the crowd.
  • Then you know better than to make this discussion about you OR me (or any poster). I could be the most knowledgeable person in the entire history of humanity and my questions still be valid, veracious, and warrant op-relevant answers. I could, alternatively, be the person most ignorant on this topic who has ever lived, and these comments and inquiries would still be valid, veracious, and warrant topical responses.
  • If some would calm down here...
  • I think I found what was confusing you. You must be confusing __________________________
  • Now if you cannot see this? Fine. Others will see it.
  • You ask for chapter and verse to spell it out for you? So you do not have to think and figure out what is needed? Here is the problem. I can not solve it for you. You can only solve it by gaining more and more knowledge for yourself before all else.
  • I can recommend a good teacher that can teach you more knowledge than you would know what to do with unless that knowledge is needed for an answer to a problem. But? Do you want it? Its free for the asking. That is God's way of raising up a genuine teacher.
  • The holes you speak of may simply be truths you have not yet learned to be able to be thinking with.
  • It takes gaining more and more knowledge of God's Word. Gained for the love of learning God's Word.
  • We need to overcome our deficiency preventing insight by gaining more and more knowledge.
  • You are asking the wrong god. You want God with a big "G". It's a common mistake.
  • Why are you afraid to let me talk?
  • The better question is why are you afraid to talk about the op and keep every word you post about the op?
  • The very thing that gets me into trouble with some who want what was discerned by insight to have its own chapter to show the insight. Then the term "speculation" is bantered about and the insight is lost to the one who needed to consider.
  • Do you have insight as to why she added to the command? There is a reason for me asking that. For I believe its been the major area of why somethings I say causes the negative reaction I have been getting.
  • You did not like what I said. Understood.
  • You are just not following.
  • You got to get yourself out of that box of only speak about "God."


Which one's were necessary to prove the op (or any alternative)? How many are not ad hominem in nature (blatant, implied, or insinuated)?


Those are from just the first five pages. A couple of them are mine :(. I could max out two, maybe three more posts with more. There are at least two occasions where the thread got off track for more than an entire page before this current occasion. Lest anyone get the wrong impression, I'm not judging anyone; I'm making some objective observations and asking you to consider them for yourselves because comments like, "Funny how I was reading it as is with His help, while you guys were going off to commentaries and education of others for reading His words," and "Hey! God wrote the Bible to ONLY YOU! Humble you," do not help anyone prove their position. It is well within my "lane" to observe what all can see. Anyone who doesn't like it can comment according or ignore it but only one of those two options will help get the thread back on topic.


But maybe I misunderstand. If this is what everyone wants, then just say so because I can post non sequitur and fallacy ad nauseam and take this thread far afield :cautious:. In fact, if this sort of nonsense is going to be allowed by all then maybe I'll do something like this in all the threads. Just let me know. ;)
It is not up to you to try and force everyone to your will and create off topic posts about being off topic if it is not your thread. The OP can do that if he desires. If it is not bothering him, why should it bother you? If you want to post on topic, then do so, and engage with those who are on topic.
 
So? You would throw out the fact that God has appointed teachers to teach the body of Christ? Instead you would rely on yourself to determine what is right even though, if they are doing their job as unto the Lord, they have been equipped and gifted by the Lord God Himself to dig out the treasures that are hidden in the scriptures. James said not many of you should become teachers (Jm.3:1) but your version is no-one should be teachers because we don't need them.

Hope I'm not in ear shot when you tell the Lord He messed up by appointing teachers on the Big Day. ;)
The point I was making was, that you were not going to the Lord to confirm the word that you got from your teachers/pastors. You accepted everything at face value because you trusted in him and his education at face value.

I would not want you to accept everything I taught at face value either because I am not your good shepherd; Jesus is.
Do you even see how that looks? (based on your understanding)

You sit there in prayer and an idea of what the scripture means comes into your head. It must be the Spirit because, according to you, that is how it works. Now how do you prove the idea is indeed the truth because your source/method is always in the same manner?

At least if my pastor says something I can verify it against other teachers of God's word as well as all the academic teaching of the various disciplines.

The only word you have is your word it is God's word. This is exactly what they do who start cults. They have a "revelation" and it aligns with a few scriptures they know and suddenly they have a whole religion going. They ignore other relevant scriptures (like God appointing teachers) to justify their ignorance and persistence in wrong doing.

I can only pray you will have the eyes of your heart enlightened. 🙏
When I share scripture about how each believer, including you, have the Unction from the Holy One to teach you all things and that no lie can be of the truth and how one can seek wisdom from the Lord at any time when something is not aligning in scripture whether it be towards a Christian teaching or some "fact" being presented by that false science, the evolution theory.

Prove all things mean in and outside of the church with the Lord Jesus Christ.
 
The point I was making was, that you were not going to the Lord to confirm the word that you got from your teachers/pastors. You accepted everything at face value because you trusted in him and his education at face value.
That was your assumption. If one is not filled with the Spirit, one cannot comprehend spiritual matters.
 
Back
Top