Of course Jesus didn't violate the spirit of the sabbath-day law.
No, John 5:18 is the writing of the author of the gospel of John under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost.
I just told you how
Yes its Blasphemy, the very fact you said He disobeyed !
You are taking a tone with me that I do not like. Therefore it is my decision to discontinue conversing with you.I have a suggestion. Stop making your posts about you and try making them about God. In fact all false doctrine and false claims of infallibility in a person, all come from a bad theology, or no theology. Theology: the study of God. Not anthropology: the study of man.
And stop doing as the Catholic church does for itself: setting yourself up as the authority on the interpretation of scripture. It actually destroys any credibility in what they say.
Was that maybe because you refused the correction? And still refuse it? It should have broken you before God to learn humility, not cause you to claim the messenger broke you. Maybe by the end of that previous year, God needed to set your feet back on a level path, because as He says, pride goeth before a fall. Those who think they already know everything and that they cannot be wrong, learn nothing. The Bible says that too.
But why is it others must be so careful with you in what they say, and you can accuse them of all sorts of dammable things simply because they disagree with you?
Your statements are offensive.What has that to do with there being an offense in the cross of Jesus and what do you think that is? What does Paul say it is in Gal 5?
The answer: preaching circumcision of the flesh is necessary for salvation. IOW the insufficiency of Christ. You would do better to cut a straight furrow with the word of God,assuring a consistency of its truth, rather than looking at random scriptures as being about you.
Who is doing either of those things?
Translators are not teachers.
So you HAVE determined that I am walking down the broad path. Is that because I don't believe the KJV is the only accurate translation? Or is it because I do not accept your interpretations of scriptures as infallible and inerrant?
Should I discount what the scriptures say and go instead with what you say. Or can the following scriptures be trusted?
John 6:47 Truly, truly I say to you, he who believes has eternal life.
John 6:29 Jesus answered and said to them, "This is the work of GOd, that you believe in HIm whom He has sent."
John 6:35 Jesus said to them, "I am the bread of life; he who comes to Me will not hunger, and he who believes in me will never thirst."
John 20:31 but these have been written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing you may have life in His name.
He didn't disobey the spirit of what is written; and that is what counts.
Say it more clearly.
One cannot determine tone without hearing the voice and seeing the person. All other tone is assumed and most likely based on something that has nothing to do with tone.You don't like what I say, can't adequately address it, so you call it tone and cast the blame onto me. There is nothing hidden that shall not be revealed.
You Blaspheme Christ friend, Who is God !
Its clear enough
Nope to both things.
Yes to both things, you are saying Christ who is God sinned, disobeyed God, that's Blasphemy. John never said Jesus disobeyed the Law, he wrote what the reprobate jews thought and said. In reality Christ didnt disobey any part of the Sabbath, internally or externally, all He did was perform an act of Mercy upon one of His Creatures, Jesus explained that . Those reprobate jews took things out of context and you have followed their wickedness.
Jesus came not after a carnal commandment but after the power of an endless life. He is the Lord of the sabbath.
So, it was also their inaccurate estimation that He said that God was His Father; making Himself equal with God?
You need to repent from your blasphemy, may Christ grant you repentance.
Again, may God grant you repentance from blasphemy against Christ.
While it is true that Abraham believed God, so he was justified (Genesis 15:6), it is also true that Abraham believed God, so he obeyed God's command to offer Isaac (Hebrews 11:17), so the same faith by which he was justified was also practiced as being an obeyer of God, but he did not earn his justification as the result of his obedience (Romans 4:1-5). So it is both the case that Abraham was a doer of the law and that he was someone who will be justified, but he was not required to have first obeyed God's law in order to become justified.
The Sabbath is a command of the Mosaic Law, but that is not what Hebrews 7:12 is referring to.
I don't question that John was writing under the inspiration of the Spirit. He accurately stated the reasons why the Pharisees had for wanting to kill Jesus, but did not state that their reasons were correct. Jesus was making himself equal with God, but the Pharisees were incorrect for wanting to kill him for saying that, and they were incorrect for thinking that Jesus had broken the Sabbath. John was not denying that Jesus is our Savior and was not saying that the Pharisees were correct in wanting to kill Jesus.
huh?
My doctrine is based on what the Bible teaches and needs no repentance.
@brightfame52, read the above post again and see if it does not preach what I am saying to you.
