Mr GLee
Well Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2023
- Messages
- 4,652
- Reaction score
- 333
- Points
- 83
- Age
- 76
- Marital status
- married
- Politics
- republican
Scripture answered for me
And im not a kid
What does it say?
Scripture answered for me
And im not a kid
Iv’e have experienced this strategy of yours before, no not till you respond to each verse and show how they mean the opposite of what scripture actually says!That is not what I asked
This is
is it possible for the "Elect" to not be saved?
Why won't you answer the question asked?
Here are the possible answers for you
Yes . is it possible for the "Elect" to not be saved
No. it is NOT possible the "Elect" will not be saved
Ideas to help kids Restate the Question in the Answer
Ideas and resources for teaching students to Restate the Question in the Answer: PQA, TTQA, RACE acronyms are included.www.talesfromoutsidetheclassroom.com
You complained to me you want an honest conversation : then step up and answer the question asked.
Have you changed the subject from predestination (before you deal with those comments that were given to your question) to irresistible grace?Do you want a list of verses that indicate a free will decision?
Grace is not irresistible
Jn 1:11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
(Chose not too?)
You are saved to be holy and to persevere in faith, which are accompanied with exhortations and warnings to enable one to do so.Conditional perseverance:
((If you are saved there would no reason to participate, no reason to abide or endure, and no need for perseverance))
Mk 13:13 endure to the end
Matt 7:14
Matt 16:24
Matt 24:13 endure to the end
Jn 2:24-25
Jn 8:9
Jn 15:4 abide in christ
Jn 15:5
Jn 15:10
Rom 1:5
Rom 8:13-17
Rom 11:22
1 cor 7:24
1 cor 13:7
2 thes 1:4
Gal 5:2-4
Gal 5:25
Col 1:21-23
Col 2:5
2 Tim 2:3
2 Tim 2:12
1 pet 2:20
1 Jn 2:24-28
1 Jn 3:6
Heb 3:4-6
Heb 6:4-9
Heb 12:7
Heb 12:22-25
James 1:12
1 John 2:6
He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also so to walk, even as he walked.
But since your save you don’t really have to.
(((The “Your Saved” gospel is another gospel and not the true gospel revealed by Christ and taught by His church))) Matt 28:19
Gal 1:6 1 Timothy 4:1 2 Tim 4:3
fo all to seeIv’e have experienced this strategy of yours before, no not till you respond to each verse and show how they mean the opposite of what scripture actually says!
Turn on your spin machine!
Its Dishonest
Its Disingenuous
And plain Rude
Thks
strategy??Iv’e have experienced this strategy of yours before, no not till you respond to each verse and show how they mean the opposite of what scripture actually says!
I MUST answer yes or no and can give reasons or scriptures my yes?strategy??
I asked you a yes or no question!
I've have experienced this strategy of yours before,
REFUSAL to directly answer a direct question:
You build conclusions based on a false premise:
Conclusions based on a false premise are invalid.
So I am asking you for your presuppositional assumption:
"is it possible for the "Elect" to not be saved?"
If you are wrong on that answer: than your conclusions based on that are in error.
Welcome to presuppositional apologetics!
A yes or no question:
- Your claims will be examined, challenged, and questioned.
- The assumptions that lead to your claims will be examined, challenged, and questioned.
- The implications that come from your claims will be examined, challenged, and questioned.
- The evidence you present for your claims will be examined, challenged, and questioned.
is it possible for the "Elect" to not be saved?
Are you hiding something?I MUST answer yes or no and can give reasons or scriptures my yes?
What good is scripture if we don’t believe it and dismiss it out of hand?Are you hiding something?
Q: hey used car dealer: was this car ever in an accident?
A: it was driven by a little old lady!
That is not what was asked
I am examining the underlying assumptions for the claims you make.
This is an apologetic website: and you are in an apologetic forum
1 Peter 3:15
627 apología (from 575 /apó, "from" and 3056 /lógos, "intelligent reasoning") – properly, a well-reasoned reply; a thought-out response to adequately address the issue(s) that is raised.
A reasoned argument (defense) that presented evidence (supplied compelling proof).]
10th time asking
Is it possible for the "Elect" to not be saved?
We don't interpret Scripture the same way:What good is scripture if we don’t believe it and dismiss it out of hand?
No. Verse 13 follows verse 12 and this is how it reads and it is the rest of the sentence begun in verse 12:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
(Chose too?)
from your #1 PopeWhat good is scripture if we don’t believe it and dismiss it out of hand?
I cannot think of any acceptable reason for @donadams to avoid answering a direct question:answering this question would be consistent with a normal, even expected, conversation on the subject at hand. To not answer it would be----well, rude.
all the wasted posts when all @donadams has to do is type 2 or 3 lettersI cannot think of any acceptable reason for @donadams to avoid answering a direct question:
There are no "gotchas" if you are on the side of truth.
I hope the guests and lurkers are noticing.
Well, the Biblical answer is no.all the wasted posts when all @donadams has to do is type 2 or 3 letters
Is it possible for the "Elect" to not be saved?
i agree:Well, the Biblical answer is no.
Which verse of scripture do you reject?all the wasted posts when all @donadams has to do is type 2 or 3 letters
Is it possible for the "Elect" to not be saved?
God forces you yo be saved against your will???Well, the Biblical answer is no.
I did but you missed it!i agree:
I think @donadams believes it is possible: but he won't clearly say