• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.

False Doctrine of the "Secret Rapture".

Dude, the following verses show Jesus on earth...
No verse was cited in Post 100 and that not-quoted verse does not say he is on a white horse.
Then stop trying to change the subject and the burden of proof.


Where does scripture state Jesus left heaven on a white horse?
Let me say it again Josheb.... Jesus didn't leave on a white horse.....
Ummmmm..... okay. He did not leave on a white horse. But he's on earth on a white horse?


Revelation 19:11-19
And I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse, and He who sat on it is called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He judges and wages war. His eyes are a flame of fire, and on His head are many diadems; and He has a name written on Him which no one knows except Himself. He is clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called The Word of God. And the armies which are in heaven, clothed in fine linen, white and clean, were following Him on white horses. From His mouth comes a sharp sword, so that with it He may strike down the nations, and He will rule them with a rod of iron; and He treads the wine press of the fierce wrath of God, the Almighty. And on His robe and on His thigh He has a name written, "King of Kings, and Lord of Lords." Then I saw an angel standing in the sun, and he cried out with a loud voice, saying to all the birds which fly in midheaven, "Come, assemble for the great supper of God, so that you may eat the flesh of kings and the flesh of commanders and the flesh of mighty men and the flesh of horses and of those who sit on them and the flesh of all men, both free men and slaves, and small and great." And I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies assembled to make war against Him who sat on the horse and against His army.

No mention of Jesus leaving heaven. No mention of Jesus on the earth. The beast is on earth, but Jesus and his army are in heaven.
Dude, the following verses show Jesus on earth...
What verse?
 
No verse was cited in Post 100 and that not-quoted verse does not say he is on a white horse.
I would imagine once Jesus is on earth just after the second coming...which is about 7 years after the rapture and the trib begins....He dismounts.
 
36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.
37 But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark,
39 And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. 40 Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
41 Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
42 Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.
Mt 24:36–42.

As in the days of Noah when judgment came in the form of the flood.
It was the one's taken that had been judged and destroyed. Those that remained were safe.
 
I would imagine once Jesus is on earth just after the second coming...which is about 7 years after the rapture and the trib begins....He dismounts.
Blessedly, we do not base sound doctrine on what is imagined.


That is sort of the point to the discussion of this op. The separated rapture point of view is one that can be reached only by inference, and the inferential- only case is not based on what is explicitly stated (and not stated). In other words, the separated rapture position is based on eisegetic inferences, not exegetic inferences.
 
Blessedly, we do not base sound doctrine on what is imagined.


That is sort of the point to the discussion of this op. The separated rapture point of view is one that can be reached only by inference, and the inferential- only case is not based on what is explicitly stated (and not stated). In other words, the separated rapture position is based on eisegetic inferences, not exegetic inferences.
Yes, it's easy to infer Jesus doesn't return on a white horse for the rapture.

It's easy to infer that at the end of the trib people won't be marrying, eating and drinking in joyous events...like they are doing today.

happy resurrection day.
 
Ummmmm..... okay. He did not leave on a white horse. But he's on earth on a white horse?
I would offer horses like mankind are used in parables to represent instruments of God's judgement or instruments of his faithfulness that works in us with us. He used men or women of renown in the same way as horses

Tribes are used to represent certain aspects of the gospel the sufferings of Christ which was spoken of beforehand through cerimonial signs to the world.

Dan was used as one that destroys false apostles sent with false prophecy a serpent striking the heel of the horse so the riders (one who trusted the false prophecy falls backward and broke his neck or slain in the Spirit

Genesis 49:16-18King James Version16 Dan shall judge his people, as one of the tribes of Israel. Dan shall be a serpent by the way, an adder in the path, that biteth the horse heels, so that his rider shall fall backward.I have waited for thy salvation, O Lord.

Revelation 19:18 That ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all men, both free and bond, both small and great.
 
Sheeze, everything for you guys has a "secret" meaning and unless we have your secret decoder ring...we'll never understand Revelation.
😆 Not really...all you need to know is that the "kings of the earth" are considered as a separate category from the kings of "the whole world" in Revelation 16:14.

Many of the former high priests in Israel (the "kings of the earth") were gathered together as leaders in Jerusalem begining in AD 66 to face off against the kings of the whole world coming against them. It wasn't just emperor Vespasian and his son Titus; there were auxiliary forces coming from a number of kings: King Antiochus, and Agrippa, and Sohemus, and Malchus king of Arabia, with troop of horsemen from Syria (Wars. 3.4.2) All of these combined armies from these several countries amounted to sixty thousand.

Any time we read the phrase "kings of the earth" in Revelation, this is a prophecy which included the high priests of the land of Israel and their activity. And since there have been no high priests serving in Israel since AD 70, that limits these prophecies to a time prior to Jerusalem's AD 70 destruction.
 
I would imagine once Jesus is on earth just after the second coming...which is about 7 years after the rapture and the trib begins....He dismounts.
Blessedly, we do not base sound doctrine on what is imagined.


That is sort of the point to the discussion of this op. The separated rapture point of view is one that can be reached only by inference, and the inferential- only case is not based on what is explicitly stated (and not stated). In other words, the separated rapture position is based on eisegetic inferences, not exegetic inferences.
To clarify: Jesus commands and judges from heaven events that occur on earth.
following from heaven to earth.
Yes, but Jesus is still in heaven. He is NOT reported to be on earth in chapters 19 or 20.
Again, the nations on earth are stuck down from heaven. Jesus is never said to be on earth.
Self explanatory
It is self-explanatory but you do not accept the self-explanation of scripture. You add a departure from heaven and a coming to earth where none are stated and the only reason you do that is because you subscribe to a man-made hermeneutic that was invented in the 19th century. None of it is stated in the relevant texts. None of it. What is stated is Jesus is in heaven commanding events that occur on the earth and it is not until chapters 21 and 22 that the text explicitly states Jesus comes to earth. Chapters 21 and 22 are very important because according to you, Jesus leaves heaven at the separated rapture and that is one coming, and then Jesus comes again on a white horse and that is another coming. Revelation 21 then cites Jesus coming to earth but there's no white horse. This then is a third coming, not a second coming. That means your eschatology of the separated rapture has Jesus leaving heaven and then coming and then going back to heaven, then leaving heaven again and coming back again after which he must go back to heaven so he can leave his white horse behind and come a third time descending with the new Jerusalem.

All of which stands in contrast to the facts of scripture: he commands events occurring on earth from heaven and he does not descend from heaven until chapter 21, by which time all his enemies have been defeated.

Psalm 110:1-7
The LORD says to my Lord: "Sit at My right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet."

Scripture is very clear: The Lord stays seated until his LORD makes a footstool of the Lord's enemies.


Psalm 110:1-7
The LORD says to my Lord: "Sit at My right hand Until I make Your enemies a footstool for Your feet." The LORD will stretch forth your strong scepter from Zion, saying, "Rule in the midst of Your enemies." Your people will volunteer freely in the day of your power; In holy array, from the womb of the dawn, your youth are to you as the dew. The LORD has sworn and will not change His mind, "You are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek." The Lord is at Your right hand; He will shatter kings in the day of His wrath. He will judge among the nations, He will fill them with corpses, He will shatter the chief men over a broad country. He will drink from the brook by the wayside; Therefore He will lift up His head.

The LORD told our Lord, God told His Son, to remain seated until God defeated all the Son's enemies. For Jesus to leave before his Father defeats his enemies would be an act of disobedience. While Jesus is seated at his Father's right hand on his Father's thrown (Rev. 3:21), several things happen...


God extends his Son's strong scepter from Zion (Heb. 12:22).
The Son rules in the midst of your enemies (Rev. 12:5, 19:15),
Christ's people volunteer freely in the day of his power (Acts 2:17; 1 Jn. 2:13-14).
Jesus is a priest forever in the Order of Mel (Heb. 5:10, 6:20, 7:10-15).
H shatters the kings in his day of wrath (Rev. 19:18).
He will judge the nations (Rev. 20:11ff).
He will fill the nations with corpses (Rev. 19:17-18).
He will shatter the leaders (Rev. 19:17-18).
He will drink from the brook by the wayside.
He will lift up his head.


Jesus does all of that while still seated in heaven at the LORD's right hand until the LORD defeats all the Lord's enemies. This corresponds perfectly with what Revelation explicitly states so there is no reason to add to Revelation or infer comings and goings that are not stated. If we take the events in the order they are listed (these events may or may not be listed in Revelation in their actual chronological order), then....

  • The marriage feast,
  • The riding of the white horse along with his white horse-riding armies,
  • The defeat of the beast and the false prophet,
  • The binding of Satan,
  • The fiery lake casting,
  • The great white throne judgment.


ALL of that occurs from heaven. Commanded from heaven, some of it occurs on earth, but Jesus is never said to leave heaven and come to earth, and he's most definitely never said to leave heaven multiple times, leaving, return, leaving, returning, again and again. Jesus is in heave all through chapters 19 and 20 (he's in heaven throughout the entire book) until chapter 21.

Revelation 21:1-4
Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the first heaven and the first earth passed away, and there is no longer any sea. And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, made ready as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a loud voice from the throne, saying, "Behold, the tabernacle of God is among men, and He will dwell among them, and they shall be His people, and God Himself will be among them, and He will wipe away every tear from their eyes; and there will no longer be any death; there will no longer be any mourning, or crying, or pain; the first things have passed away."

That is the first time the book of Revelation explicitly states Jesus comes to earth. Every single verse for 20 chapters has him in heaven, never on earth.

The separated rapture has no basis in Revelation 19 or 20.




The scriptures have been provided.
It's going to take a lot more than your argument to show I'm way out in right field.
The scriptures have been provided. The show the truth. If scripture read exactly as written will not persuade then that is a serious problem; one much more serious than waiting for a separated rapture nowhere found in those scriptures.
 
Yes, it's easy to infer Jesus doesn't return on a white horse for the rapture.
I disagree, but the ease of inference is not a reason to do so; especially not in direct contradiction to the explicit statements and the silence of God's word and the existence of an accurate and orthodox alternative(s).
It's easy to infer that at the end of the trib people won't be marrying, eating and drinking in joyous events...like they are doing today.
No, it is not. The wedding feast and the introduction of the bride occur after the great tribulation in Revelation. This is indisputable. The inference you're asserting is also a gross misrepresentation of what happened in the days of Noah reference. I've quoted the scriptures plainly stating it's the ones who get taken away that are destroyed. Two on a roof, one taken away and destroyed, the other remaining to live with God. Two in the field; one taken away and destroyed, the other remaining behind to live in a covenant relationship with God. That is what happened in the days of Noah but modern futurism twists, mangle, perverts scripture to make scripture say the exact opposite of what it states.
happy resurrection day.
Thank you. You too. Hope your day is blessed with the fellowship of God and His people.
 
I would offer horses like mankind are used in parables to represent instruments of God's judgement or instruments of his faithfulness that works in us with us. He used men or women of renown in the same way as horses

Tribes are used to represent certain aspects of the gospel the sufferings of Christ which was spoken of beforehand through cerimonial signs to the world.

Dan was used as one that destroys false apostles sent with false prophecy a serpent striking the heel of the horse so the riders (one who trusted the false prophecy falls backward and broke his neck or slain in the Spirit

Genesis 49:16-18King James Version16 Dan shall judge his people, as one of the tribes of Israel. Dan shall be a serpent by the way, an adder in the path, that biteth the horse heels, so that his rider shall fall backward.I have waited for thy salvation, O Lord.

Revelation 19:18 That ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all men, both free and bond, both small and great.
How does any of that prove or disprove a separated rapture?
 
😆 Not really...all you need to know is that the "kings of the earth" are considered as a separate category from the kings of "the whole world" in Revelation 16:14.

I'm getting tired of this "here's what it really means theology".

Please put your shoehorn back into the closet.


 
No, it is not. The wedding feast and the introduction of the bride occur after the great tribulation in Revelation. This is indisputable.
The marriage supper is just prior to Christ return on the white horse with those raptured and resurrected 7 years prior.
Christ then returns to earth and defeats the beast and false prophet...Satan is then bound then cast into the lake of fire...then the white throne judgement followed by the new heaven and new earth...and the arrival of new Jerusalem.

When does the tribulation end? I would say when Christ returns on the white horse and wraps things up.
 
I'm getting tired of this "here's what it really means theology".

Please put your shoehorn back into the closet.
And we are getting tired of "let's add to scripture theology."

The marriage supper is just prior to Christ return on the white horse with those raptured and resurrected 7 years prior.
Nope. That is what modern futurism teaches, not what scripture teaches.
Christ then returns to earth and defeats the beast and false prophet...Satan is then bound then cast into the lake of fire...then the white throne judgement followed by the new heaven and new earth...and the arrival of new Jerusalem.
Argumentum ad nauseam.
When does the tribulation end? I would say when Christ returns on the white horse and wraps things up.
Scripture never states Jesus leaves heaven on a white horse. Nor does it say he arrives on a white horse. You argued Jesus returns the same way he left (Acts 1:11) and he was not riding a white horse when he left. You cannot have it both ways. Your own posts continue to contradict one another.
 
Like me they simply read the bible....and present it linearly as the bible does.
The facts in evidence prove otherwise. There's not a single verse in the entire Bible explicitly separating the rapture from the second coming.
 
The facts in evidence prove otherwise. There's not a single verse in the entire Bible explicitly separating the rapture from the second coming.
Well maybe not a single verse....but the angel did say Jesus would return the way he left...that's 1...and then there is the second verse that says Jesus will return riding a white horse.

Those two verses are enough to show Jesus returns twice. Once in the air then a second time Jesus on earth.

On the other hand there is the decription of the return being when people are partying like in the days of Noah....which I doubt will be happening at the end of the tribulation when Jesus returns as sorts things out. What do you think? Will it be party time just before Jesus returns?
 
Well maybe not a single verse....
I want you to keep this in mind as we continue. This is the second time this has come around in our conversation. There is not one verse in the entire Bible that explicitly states what has been claimed in support of a separated rapture.

Why then do you believe something nowhere stated?

I don't ask this solely of you, @CrowCross. I ask this of ALL folks who believe things nowhere stated in scripture. I'd ask this of any Trinitarian and I've spent the last week and a half debating and supporting the doctrine of the Trinity with piles of scripture (the point being I hold myself to the exact same standard to which I now try to hold you). You believe something not actually stated in scripture. Why?

We have also already established you hold this position because of an inferential reading of scripture. Fine. There is nothing automatically inherently wrong with inferences if they are built on clear statements found in scripture. We're not supposed to invent a postion and then read other scriptures according to that invented interpretation. We're supposed to start with what is actually stated and make our inferences based on those statements.

You have failed at that practice. Repeatedly. Here's an example...
but the angel did say Jesus would return the way he left...that's 1...
Yes, that is what the angel said in Acts 1:11.

Acts 1:9-11
And after he had said these things, he was lifted up while they were looking on, and a cloud received him out of their sight. And as they were gazing intently into the sky while he was going, behold, two men in white clothing stood beside them. They also said, "Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into the sky? This Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in just the same way as you have watched him go into heaven."

Notice what the text specifically states. First, Jesus did not take himself up to heaven. Something or someone else took him up :unsure:. Second, the angel does not state Jesus will come all the way to earth when he returns the way he left. It is an assumption on everyone's part that Acts 1:11 reports Jesus is on earth. It does not. Not only does it not state he will come all the way back to earth, it also does not report he went all the way to heaven, either 😯. We do, of course, have other places where scripture explicitly states Jesus is in heaven 😁 so there is reason to infer Jesus left earth and went to heaven - inferences based on clear, explicit statements and not inferences based on further inferential reading. There is a fourth point, but I won't belabor it right now because 1) it'll take a lengthy post to do so, and 2) I'm not sure you will agree - even though I can provide plenty of scripture to support the position which is this: God is said to come and go on clouds many places in the Bible (Ex. 13:21; Ex. 40:38; Lev. 16:2; Ps. 11:11; Isa. 19:1 and many more). There are more than 100 of these verses in the Bible, and some of them can be taken literally and some of them can (and should) be taken figuratively. In Psalm 11, for example, the text reports God riding on a cherub. One has to ask, "Why does God need to ride or come on clouds at all?" If God is always everywhere at once, then what exactly is "coming" and "going" really about?

In Acts 1, Jesus leaves earth and goes up into the sky. He does so being lifted up and he is NOT lifted up on a white horse as has already been covered. Because he did not leave on a white horse, he will not return on a white horse and this makes perfect sense because nowhere in Revelation (the only book of the Bible explicitly stating Jesus ever rides a white horse) is Jesus stated to leave heaven on that white horse.

That means ALL of the eschatological claims any teacher might ever make about him doing so are all extra-biblical claims that add to which we are explicitly instructed not to add.
...and then there is the second verse that says Jesus will return riding a white horse.
Not in Acts 1. So, to which "second verse" are you referring? There are only two verses stating Jesus is ever riding a white horse and neither of them say anything about a rapture and neither of them say anything about him leaving heaven.

Revelation 6:1-2
Then I saw when the Lamb broke one of the seven seals, and I heard one of the four living creatures saying as with a voice of thunder, "Come." I looked, and behold, a white horse, and he who sat on it had a bow; and a crown was given to him, and he went out conquering and to conquer.

Revelation 19:11
And I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse, and He who sat on it is called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He judges and wages war.


Stick to what is stated and do not add to it. That is the hermeneutic the book of Revelation tells us to use! In both cases, Jesus is observed in heaven and never stated to leave, never stated to come to earth. As I have posted several times already, Jesus is not stated to come to earth until chapters 21 and 22.
Those two verses are enough to show Jesus returns twice. Once in the air then a second time Jesus on earth.
No, they are not. Those two verses do not state what you say they say.
On the other hand there is the decription of the return being when people are partying like in the days of Noah.... which I doubt will be happening at the end of the tribulation when Jesus returns as sorts things out. What do you think? Will it be party time just before Jesus returns?
Already covered. In the days of Noah it was those who were taken away that were destroyed. Jesus' reference to the days of Noah has absolutely nothing to do with any rapture, separated or otherwise. That same narrative explicitly states Christians will be handed over to tribulation and immediately after the great tribulation they will see things as described in Jesus' teaching. In other words, Christians go through the tribulation; they are not raptured away to escape it.... and the book of Revelation confirms this.

Revelation 7:13-14
Then one of the elders answered, saying to me, "These who are clothed in the white robes, who are they, and where have they come from?" I said to him, "My lord, you know." And he said to me, "These are the ones who come out of the great tribulation, and they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.

Christians go through the great tribulation. They "come out" of it. They do not get raptured away to escape its travails.

Thomas Ice is wrong.
 
I want you to keep this in mind as we continue. This is the second time this has come around in our conversation. There is not one verse in the entire Bible that explicitly states what has been claimed in support of a separated rapture.
I'm beginnng to tire of you.

White horses and weddings. I've said it before and will continue to say it.
 
I'm beginnng to tire of you.

White horses and weddings. I've said it before and will continue to say it.
I understand, but I must ask whether the tiring is due to my persistence or you inability to address the facts in evidence.

You might also consider how tiresome it is for others to constantly read things claimed about white horses and weddings that are nowhere found in scripture followed by an abject failure to acknowledge what is stated therein. A feast is not a wedding. Look up things like hachnasat kallah the erusin, the nissuin, kabbalat panim, and seudat mitzvah. That will help you get a handle on the wedding feast parables, Mt. 22:30, Rev. 19:7-10, and Rev. 20:2. Six pages should be sufficient space to prove a separated rapture and that has not happened. There are serious, fatal flaws in every attempt to do so.

Mark 12:24-25
Jesus said to them, "Is this not the reason you are mistaken, that you do not understand the Scriptures or the power of God? "For when they rise from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven.



I'll see you in the next op. :)
 
Back
Top