What’s wrong with saying it like I did?
I have already answered that question and explain how and why. John 12:32 states all men are drawn to Christ. Therefore, John 6:44 cannot be made to say only some men are drawn to Christ. The reconciliation of those two lies in the specified context of John 6 and the specified context of John 12.
Some men are drawn to Jesus for resurrection and eternal life, but all men are drawn to Christ for judgment.
Therefore, the belief only the elect are drawn to Christ is incorrect, and so too is the earlier statement, "
All those who are drawn believe." John 12:32 necessarily precludes the former and the many, many verses about Jesus condemning and casting out the non-believers precludes the latter.
No, the premise ONLY the elect are drawn to Christ is not biblical. The biblically accurate position is that God draws all of the elect to Christ for salvation (or, more specifically as far as John 6 goes, He draws them to His Son for resurrection and eternal life). Everyone else is also drawn to Christ whereby they are judged, confess him as Lord, and then get shipped of in their already-existing state of condemnation (a state that currently exists and is NOT limited to any "church age" or the other side of the grave). Just as the John 6 text is couched in resurrection and eternal life, the John 12:32 text is explicitly couched in judgment of the not believing.
John 12:27-40
"Now is my soul troubled. And what shall I say? ‘Father, save me from this hour’? But for this purpose I have come to this hour. Father, glorify your name.” Then a voice came from heaven: “I have glorified it, and I will glorify it again.” The crowd that stood there and heard it said that it had thundered. Others said, “An angel has spoken to him.” Jesus answered, “This voice has come for your sake, not mine. Now is the judgment of this world; now will the ruler of this world be cast out. And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself.” He said this to show by what kind of death he was going to die. So the crowd answered him, “We have heard from the Law that the Christ remains forever. How can you say that the Son of Man must be lifted up? Who is this Son of Man?” So Jesus said to them, “The light is among you for a little while longer. Walk while you have the light, lest darkness overtake you. The one who walks in the darkness does not know where he is going. While you have the light, believe in the light, that you may become sons of light.” Though he had done so many signs before them, they still did not believe in him, so that the word spoken by the prophet Isaiah might be fulfilled: “Lord, who has believed what he heard from us, and to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed?” Therefore they could not believe. For again Isaiah said, “He has blinded their eyes and hardened their heart, lest they see with their eyes, and understand with their heart, and turn, and I would heal them.”
Judgment. Not believing. Those prophesied not to believe what they heard. Those prophesied not to believe
to whom the arm of the LORD had been revealed. Those who had been blinded, hardened, and blinded and hardened so they would not be healed.
So, no, the only-some-are-drawn
and the all-men-drawn-believe
and the only-elect-are-drawn positions are not biblical. Only the elect are drawn by God to His Son for salvation. All others are drawn to the Son for judgment without salvation.
I think you’re looking for something that just isn’t there. So stop adding it.
You’re falsely accusing.
Never happened. However, for the sake of fellowship I will rephrase what I said. NO ONE can make view John 6:44 in a manner that contradicts John 12:32. Not me, or you, or Lucy, or Ricky, or anyone else. Doing so violates the precept of scripture speaking cohesively and never contradicting itself.
Is that better?
Jesus draws all men unto himself. These all men are believers. Think about that.
I have. It is wrong. It is wrong for the reasons already posted.
God does not do His part, to draw all of Adam’s posterity and then let them make a choice.
I agree and have never said any such thing (unless
openly playing the part of the Arminian as the proverbial "devil's advocate"). I have
repeatedly stated the sinner's will is irrelevant. There is no choice and even if there were it is irrelevant. God does not consider the sinner's faculties, attributes, or works. Nothing of the sinner is meritorious and God in no way is ever dependent upon anything of the creature, especially nothing sinful. I have posted these statements scores of times so it cannot truthfully be said I have ever stated God "
let them make a choice." No such thing has ever happened in this forum (two decades ago when I was a synergist I said such things but it's never happened here).
And I'd like to know why my posts are being so grossly misrepresented.
Ultimately, that is what you are saying.
Prove it.
Quote me stating "
God does not do His part to draw all of Adam's posterity and then let them make a choice." If that cannot be done then quote me necessarily implying such a thing. Do it now, please.