Which is the resurrection in the last day (Jn 6:39-40, 44, 54).
Yes, that was the second coming - in AD 70 when those verses were fulfilled.
Keeping in mind that the NT writers believed that the second coming, resurrection, rapture and final judgment would be in their lifetimes.
However, there being no Lord Jesus coming from heaven in blazing fire with his powerful angels, and there being no final judgment in their lifetimes, there was also no resurrection and rapture in their lifetime, which in NT apostolic teaching authoritative to the church (Lk 10:16) are all part of the second coming.
Yes, this was taught by the NT writers who believed (and rightly so) that the second coming, resurrection, rapture and judgment of the dead (not the final one) would be
in their lifetimes. And it did happen then, just as Jesus foretold to them. That "blazing fire" of God taking vengeance on His enemies did descend on Jerusalem, which was quite literally burned up. Angels gathered all the resurrected elect saints to the Mount of Olives location and Christ returned with them to heaven in AD 70. The rapture also gathered all those who had already been made "alive" by a resurrection process (like Lazarus and the Matthew 27:52-53 saints). These had "remained" on earth until then, but joined the rest of those newly-resurrected ones in meeting Christ together in the air and being taken to heaven at that point.
Unless "coming in his Father's glory" was referring to his transfiguration (Mt 7:1) which demonstrated that Jesus would return in his Father's glory for the resurrection.
That's not even possible. Jesus did not "
come in His Father's glory" at the Mount of Transfiguration in Matthew 17:1 because
He had never left yet. No resurrection was pictured on that Mount of Transfiguration, and no angels accompanied Him, and He gave out no rewards then according to every man's works, as was described in Matthew 16:27-28. The Mount of Transfiguration was for Elijah, Moses, and Christ to discuss His approaching crucifixion death at Jerusalem.
I interpret the first resurrection of the riddle in Rev 20:5-6 as the new birth (Jn 3:3-8) from spiritual death to eternal life.
This is flawed. The
"First resurrection" was timed to take place simultaneously with the ending of the Rev. 20 millennium
at a particular point on the calendar - not multiplied millions of times when anyone is brought to life in Christ by the new birth. 1 Corinthians 15:23 described the ranked order of resurrections in chronological time, with "Christ the
First-fruits" rising from the dead, and then followed afterward in time by the next, 2nd resurrection event of "those who are Christ's at His coming".
There is no third resurrection in apostolic teaching authoritative to the church.
The institution of the "church" today is not our authority.
Christ was made "the head over all things to the church" and HE ONLY is the ultimate authority. Christ taught His disciples about His first-century bodily return that would occur before that generation had all died. The NT writers and Apostles all believed this and taught it as well. Time continued to flow after Christ's second coming in AD 70, often with periods of tribulation for the saints, but none of which ever duplicated exactly what happened in the Great Tribulation period back in AD 66-70.
We are currently in the "year-to-year" (Zech 14:16) ages that followed Christ's second coming in Zechariah 14:4-5. All of us are destined to stand before the judgment seat of Christ to receive the things which are done in our body, whether they be good or bad. Scripture never tells us that this is one simultaneous event for all mankind at the same time. There is more than one Great White Throne judgment that God scheduled for mankind. You will labor in vain to find a scripture verse which says there is ONE and ONLY ONE return of Christ and ONE and ONLY ONE resurrection for the saints.