JIM
Well Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2023
- Messages
- 1,881
- Reaction score
- 196
- Points
- 63
- Age
- 85
- Location
- Prescott, AZ
- Faith
- Christian
- Politics
- Conservative
I agree with that. That was the common view of nearly all Jews. Jesus, indeed, spoke against that. That does not mitigate against the fact that Jesus said that believing was a work, it was something that we do.Jesus was speaking to Jews who were thoroughly convinced that the works of the law would save them.
And as a matter of interest, it was Jews who were thoroughly convinced that the works of the law would save them that Paul wrote Romans 9. His whole point of that chapter was to dissuade them of that false notion.
That is not true at all. There is no way to twist that out of it. Clearly Jesus answered their question directly and accurately. Their question was, "What can WE DO to to the works of God?"Given that this follows the statement of verse 29, the work of God might well mean that it is our believing is God's doing. But even if that is not the case, it clearly is saying that believing is not something that merits grace, but it is by the will of the Father that we believe and that is grace. Jesus said that, even though those listening to him had just seen him feed five thousand with a couple of fish and a few loaves of bread, they still did not believe who He was, but remained locked into salvation by works.
And that old nonsense about not meriting grace is such a red flag. Nothing could possibly ever be enough to merit eternal life. That is the point. If one kept the entire law of God perfectly, save one, he would not merit eternal life. That does not mean that God did not place some conditions for receiving that grace. Conditions, no matter how numerous or egregious even if perfectly met, could ever be said to merit the grace of being given eternal life. That would mirror the poor schlock who once claimed, "I'd give a thousand dollars to be one of them millionaires". It just doesn't work that way.