WW III and the rebuilding of the temple

[Arial]

Except they don't all line up, so you changed what Jesus said in Matthew 24.

There aren't any of my words, only Jesus' words in the quotes from Luke 21 and Mark 13. So how did I change what he said in Matt 24?

 

[Mr GLee]

The 3 1/2 years in Revelation starts when the beast is revealed and comes in the power of Satan as Anti christ. I believe, well, lean towards believing that the first 3 1/2 years is the beast/Antichrist being everyone's best friend. Then comes a moment, which is the abomination of desolation, where he is fully revealed, and C. That marks the beginning of the Great Tribulation. As to whether it is exactly 3 1/2 years, that depends on God and how God determined it to unfold. We won't know exactly when Jesus returns. He will show up to save His elect from Satan and his allies.

No signs were given to wonder after an evil generation seeks after .

Believers have prophecy (sola scriptura) till the end of time

Kings in Israel a faithless Pagan foundation .

The time of reformation had come. Destroying all kingdoms of men. A hierarchy of dying mankind through oral tradition and lying wonders to wonder after as if Prophecy .(sola scriptura) Lording it over the understanding (faith) of the non venerable pew warmer or show time watchers

The Pagan foundation (fools) "out of sight out of mind" (no invisible God )

The abomination of desolation kings in Israel.

The antichrist the father of lies Satan bringing false prophecy from dying mankind, false apostle. Using Peter our brother in the lord to reveal the wiles of the evil one .

The veil was rent there was no Jewish man as King of kings sitting in what they called a holy place and Christ called the abomination of desolation

Peter who revealed the work of the antichrists' is not eternal God .That's a Catholic thing making Peter a Jewish man as King of kings .

They need to make him dying mankind in order to bring in the Queen mother entity .Named after our sister in the Lord Mary

Mathew 16: 22 Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee.
But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of

Satan could no longer s deceive all the nations of the world that Christ our Husband is a dying Jewish man as King of kings

Peter was forgiven of his blasphemy against the Son of man Jesus or brother in the lord .Blasphemy against the invisible Father no forgiveness

The clearest picture of the man of sin .Satan uses men to sin. . antichrists' a legion of false prophets

Peter was forgiven of his blasphemy against the Son of man jesus our brother in the lord .

Blasphemy agin the invisible Father. . no forgiveness

2 Thessalonians 2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin (Peter) be revealed, the son of perdition;

 

[TMSO]

There aren't any of my words, only Jesus' words in the quotes from Luke 21 and Mark 13. So how did I change what he said in Matt 24?

You said, using Matthew 24, that Jesus was saying that it is the worst tribulation in Israel, though He clearly said the world, and that when it said no flesh would be left alive, it solely meant those in Jerusalem/Israel, and no one else. Jesus did not say that. You changed what He said. If you say that you fell this is what He meant, that is one thing, but you said that you were going to change the wording. That is dangerous ground.

 

[Arial]

You said, using Matthew 24, that Jesus was saying that it is the worst tribulation in Israel, though He clearly said the world, and that when it said no flesh would be left alive, it solely meant those in Jerusalem/Israel, and no one else. Jesus did not say that. You changed what He said. If you say that you fell this is what He meant, that is one thing, but you said that you were going to change the wording. That is dangerous ground.

I did not say I was going to change the wording. I gave my interpretation of it which takes into account historical evidence and the full counsel of God. If anyone is changing things it is you. It does not say no one in the whole world would be left alive.

Berean Standard Bible
If those days had not been cut short, nobody would be saved. But for the sake of the elect, those days will be cut short.



New King James Version
And unless those days were shortened, no flesh would be saved; but for the elect’s sake those days will be shortened.

New American Standard Bible
And if those days had not been cut short, no life would have been saved; but for the sake of the elect those days will be cut short.

So maybe it is saying that if judgement had not come upon Israel as it did in a.d.70 and the further scattering of the Jews that were left, God's plan for the elect would have been broken. That may be a bit of a stretch or not, but in any case the content in which the statement is made is specifically about the things the disciples were going to experience in their lifetime---and that they did.

What is dangerous is to falsely accuse someone of saying something they did not say.