@LeviR
Brakel said, Original sin consists of imputed guilt and inherent pollution.
We do not understand imputed guilt to mean that man, due to his inherited corruption, must be viewed as being in the same condition as Adam; that is as, if he in actuality had committed the same deed that Adam had committed. This would not be the imputation of someone else's crime, but rather of one's own. This would be nothing more than a comparison between specific sins of specific people, and a comparison between sins as far as guilt and punishment are concerned. Then our sinfulness could just as well be measured against the sins of others, instead of against Adam's sin. Rather, by imputed guilt we understand the imputation of the original breach of the covenant itself, as was committed by Adam. By denying or distorting this truth the foundation is laid also to deny the pollution of sin inherited from Adam and thus of all original sin. This in turn leads to the denial of the imputation of the righteousness of Christ.
Imputation occurs because of a personal crime, whereby he who personally commits a sin by virtue of the deed righteously makes himself worthy of punishment commensurate therewith; or this imputation occurs because of the crime of another person with whom one exists in a relationship, and by virtue of this relationship participate in the same sin. The sin of someone with whom we have no relationship whatsoever can also not righteously be imputed.