The First Time In Us History That Kids Are Testifying In Court About The Effects Of Climate Change On Their Wellbeing.

[Frank Robert]

I have given you quite a pile of facts, plus the list of 1100 scientists at Prager plus some articles in creationwiki. You are wrong about 'nothing there.'

A list of 1100 scientists are not facts and creationwki is not a science site

You are in total denial of what the media is like and doing with climate change. "Knowledge" means to know what these people are trying to accomplish. They are making a crisis out of 0.001 degree change over the past 50 years! It's just like when they changed the flu stats out and called everything Covid, to get everyone to take a vax that made Blackrock Ts of money and killed 17--170M people, is destroying sperm (German Ph.D. this week), etc.

My guess is you are unable to tell the difference between science and religion because you haven't shown that you understand the difference.

 

[Frank Robert]

I don't think there is any point in disputing the degree changes you mentioned, but it is moot. Sampling methods are often at fault.

You make a lot of unsubstantiated claims. If you make a claim that a particular sampling method is faulty your claim is not worth a pig fart.

this is my last post on this topic. I'll be starting a new one tomorrow , just some final thoughts.

I don't care what conspiracy theories you believe but I do care if when people spread them because they can cause damage.

I think it is awesome that today's younger generations are not buying the fossil fuel deceit and disinformation and are pretty much rejecting the conspiracy theories people like you are spreading.

Let's see out the case works out. My guess is that you are going to be very disappointed and this case appears to be just a start as our younger generations don't want their future disseminated or stolen because of their parents willful ignorance.

 

[EarlyActs]

Isn't it obvious that it you and your ilk are the ones who who panicking. It is apparent the our kids understand that there is a problem and that their parents (not all parents) are desperately trying to sweep under the rug in the hope that what we can't except will miraculously go away. You can fool yourselves but you can't fool your kids who are destined to live a vastly diminished life style thanks to their parents refusal to correct their own behavior and mistakes.

You can pretend we can live above our means and hold on to conspiracy theories that on own kids no longer buy.

Do you understand that communism doesn’t sell but climate worry sells communism and that will enslave? “You will own nothing and be happy”. Bug protein. 15 min cities. Social monitoring cameras everywhere. The end of freedom .

That is your issue, shame on you for chosing slavery.

 

[EarlyActs]

A list of 1100 scientists are not facts and creationwki is not a science site


My guess is you are unable to tell the difference between science and religion because you haven't shown that you understand the difference.

I am using your facts, sir. You are irrational.

 

[EarlyActs]

You make a lot of unsubstantiated claims. If you make a claim that a particular sampling method is faulty your claim is not worth a pig fart.

this is my last post on this topic. I'll be starting a new one tomorrow , just some final thoughts.

I don't care what conspiracy theories you believe but I do care if when people spread them because they can cause damage.

I think it is awesome that today's younger generations are not buying the fossil fuel deceit and disinformation and are pretty much rejecting the conspiracy theories people like you are spreading.

Let's see out the case works out. My guess is that you are going to be very disappointed and this case appears to be just a start as our younger generations don't want their future disseminated or stolen because of their parents willful ignorance.

You need to answer for the already documented and avowed communism that the WEF and the EU and Davos have said they will bring.

 

[EarlyActs]

You are not showing what you recently saw so makes no sense to those who have not seen it.


Biden like most politicians says stupid things. what else is new.

That is a good thing as you have demonstrated a limited knowledge of them.

Nice word salad for those who like word salads.

The Founders paragraph is US history. See my documentary.

 

[EarlyActs]

Thuneberg is the ignorant shill you should condemn.

 

[EarlyActs]

https://x.com/wideawake_media/status/1751214438353400214?s=20

 

[EarlyActs]

https://x.com/wideawake_media/status/1751214438353400214?s=20

Here is the key quote from the video:
"CO2 is a gas that currently represents 0.041% of the whole atmosphere. Despite this small [percentage], for decades now, campaigns are ran to make people believe that man-made CO2 is the cause of climate change."

Or, as former Czech PM V. Havel said: "The climate alarm is the new form of redistributionism, only now, it is done for the sake of the planet, not the proletariat."

 

[EarlyActs]

Local authorities in Juneau AK have just reported record snow for the area for January.

This should not be seen as a small profile indicator; the N Pacific wind pattern brings an atmospheric river to the area frequently. But that river is often too warm to produce snowfall. 2 of the last 3 winters have resulted in record snow. In the previous, there was a local talk show in which a guest meteorologist was trying to explain why there was a 10 year cold record in the N Pacific, and the host was nearly in tears realizing that there might not be global warming after all, and that science might possibly be quite mistaken.

 

[Frank Robert]

Local authorities in Juneau AK have just reported record snow for the area for January.

Where did you get the idea that global warming precludes record snowfalls ? Just a reminder: a particular snowfall, record or not, is weather not climate

This should not be seen as a small profile indicator; the N Pacific wind pattern brings an atmospheric river to the area frequently. But that river is often too warm to produce snowfall.

Why would you think that? Learning about El Niño and La Niña climate patterns might provide a better perspective.

2 of the last 3 winters have resulted in record snow.

See above comment.

In the previous, there was a local talk show in which a guest meteorologist was trying to explain why there was a 10 year cold record in the N Pacific, and the host was nearly in tears realizing that there might not be global warming after all, and that science might possibly be quite mistaken.

The meteorologist sounds confused as you about weather and climate.

This simple image should put it into perspective for both of you.

 

[eclipseEventSigns]

It's about time that natural process of abiotic oil enter the global conversation and is proved in court.

 

[EarlyActs]

please try the image again, only the top strip shows

 

[EarlyActs]

please try the image again, only the top strip shows

 

[EarlyActs]

A list of 1100 scientists are not facts and creationwki is not a science site

That's a non-answer Frank. If you have original research that comes close to the 1100, put up or be quiet. Nullius in verba (do not trust others word; confirm for yourself).

 

[EarlyActs]

Where did you get the idea that global warming precludes record snowfalls ? Just a reminder: a particular snowfall, record or not, is weather not climate

Why would you think that? Learning about El Niño and La Niña climate patterns might provide a better perspective.

See above comment.

The meteorologist sounds confused as you about weather and climate.

This simple image should put it into perspective for both of you.

View attachment 730

Any other simple ideas I already know? The secular talk host here and his meteorologist were expecting a certain climate! You are such a simple read. Who is paying you? Why do you do this?

The record is for a whole month; if you know Juneau, you know there is precip almost every day. So are you going to call a whole month a 'single snowfall.' The same thing happened two years ago, it was slightly better last year.

I live by glaciers; you do not, that makes you the expert. The 1500-2000 ft thick mass of icefield here is going know-where. One glacier has withdrawn, another has appeared. The main one, Taku, broke up its annual dam 200 years ago, an ice dam that stretched about 2 miles across, and the local tribe basically had to start from scratch. It was all their hot fires in their cabins, you know.

 

[EarlyActs]

Here is the key quote from the video:
"CO2 is a gas that currently represents 0.041% of the whole atmosphere. Despite this small [percentage], for decades now, campaigns are ran to make people believe that man-made CO2 is the cause of climate change."

Or, as former Czech PM V. Havel said: "The climate alarm is the new form of redistributionism, only now, it is done for the sake of the planet, not the proletariat."

I see you have no response to the actual science.

 

[Frank Robert]

A list of 1100 scientists are not facts and creationwki is not a science site

What research have they done and what have they published in the scientific journals.

That's a non-answer Frank. If you have original research that comes close to the 1100, put up or be quiet. Nullius in verba (do not trust others word; confirm for yourself).

Name the top 10 of the 1001.

 

[EarlyActs]

What research have they done and what have they published in the scientific journals.

Name the top 10 of the 1001.

They are at Pragerradio.com in a dropdown tab at the top. Among the top have been listed above; I don't know if you actually read my posts. Lungborg, Moore (founder of GreenPeace), come to mind. Oard may be there, a meteorologist.

There's no point in them listing themselves if they are not qualified, right? That would be a non sequitor.

G Whitestone, geologist, and best-selling author: "There is no climate crisis. Modest warming and more CO2 are benefitting humanity... Cold kills 15-20 times as many people as does heat. Global warming would save lives... With almost every metric we look at, we see that Earth's ecosystems are thriving and prospering.'" --recently on @LSNTVREPORTS. His news letter is on wide-awake-media.com

 

[Frank Robert]

Any other simple ideas I already know? The secular talk host here and his meteorologist were expecting a certain climate! You are such a simple read. Who is paying you? Why do you do this?

If they were expecting certain climate for a period less than 30 years they, like you, do not know know what climate is.

The record is for a whole month; if you know Juneau, you know there is precip almost every day. So are you going to call a whole month a 'single snowfall.' The same thing happened two years ago, it was slightly better last year.

A month is weather not climate. If you can not look up the definition for yourself then then stop pestering me.

I live by glaciers; you do not, that makes you the expert

My guess is you never read any science of glaciers.

I did not claim to be an expert on glaciers or anything outside my own field. But that does not stop me from doing research by the experts. You have yet to name one expert to backup up any of your dribble. Nor, have you responded to any of the links that I provided with my comments.

The 1500-2000 ft thick mass of icefield here is going know-where. One glacier has withdrawn, another has appeared. The main one, Taku, broke up its annual dam 200 years ago, an ice dam that stretched about 2 miles across, and the local tribe basically had to start from scratch. It was all their hot fires in their cabins, you know.

If you want to discuss these things you should at the very very least look up the definitions. You are still confusing weather and climate.

Don't expect an answer from my until you have something of value to respond to or that you are unable to substantiate.