The First Time In Us History That Kids Are Testifying In Court About The Effects Of Climate Change On Their Wellbeing.

[EarlyActs]

W Happer, prof emeritus in physics at Princeton, and R Lindzen, prof emeritus of atmospheric science at MIT: "EPA climate regulations based on a hoax."

The article shows that the expression 'fact-check' is used to support climate policy when it is actually information very lacking in peer review, thus consistently wrong in projecting outcomes. Rep by Robin Monotti at X, also in the Epoch Times. The two have testified to the EPA about its inaccurate models.

 

[EarlyActs]

What proof do you give that you will actually read posts like #117, which of course, is from last week which you did not mention? Actually there are several.

 

[Frank Robert]

They are at Pragerradio.com in a dropdown tab at the top. Among the top have been listed above; I don't know if you actually read my posts. Lungborg, Moore (founder of GreenPeace), come to mind. Oard may be there, a meteorologist.

There's no point in them listing themselves if they are not qualified, right? That would be a non sequitor.

G Whitestone, geologist, and best-selling author: "There is no climate crisis. Modest warming and more CO2 are benefitting humanity... Cold kills 15-20 times as many people as does heat. Global warming would save lives... With almost every metric we look at, we see that Earth's ecosystems are thriving and prospering.'" --recently on @LSNTVREPORTS. His news letter is on wide-awake-media.com

I can't make any sense out of what point you are trying to make. Names mean nothing.

 

[EarlyActs]

If they were expecting certain climate for a period less than 30 years they, like you, do not know know what climate is.

A month is weather not climate. If you can not look up the definition for yourself then then stop pestering me.


My guess is you never read any science of glaciers.

I did not claim to be an expert on glaciers or anything outside my own field. But that does not stop me from doing research by the experts. You have yet to name one expert to backup up any of your dribble. Nor, have you responded to any of the links that I provided with my comments.


If you want to discuss these things you should at the very very least look up the definitions. You are still confusing weather and climate.

Don't expect an answer from my until you have something of value to respond to or that you are unable to substantiate.

Yes they were expecting 30 years of warming and were in tears to realize science could be so mistaken.

 

[EarlyActs]

I can't make any sense out of what point you are trying to make. Names mean nothing.

As far as I can tell, words mean nothing to you! I find no rational approach at all.

 

[EarlyActs]

I can't make any sense out of what point you are trying to make. Names mean nothing.

Try interpreting the Taku ice dam breakup 200 years ago.

 

[Frank Robert]

What proof do you give that you will actually read posts like #117, which of course, is from last week which you did not mention? Actually there are several.

I stopped reading your dribble. Post 117 was a video, a video is not scientific.

Yes they were expecting 30 years of warming and were in tears to realize science could be so mistaken.

What is you point? What research did they do.? Provide a link to a reparable science publication. Until you do, don't bother me with your dribble.

 

[Frank Robert]

Try interpreting the Taku ice dam breakup 200 years ago.

What your point? What makes a ice dam breakup 200 years ago pertinent to climate?

I lookup up Dennis Prager. He is an American Jewish author and radio host who co-wrote a book about questions people ask about Judaism with an Orthodox Jewish rabbi named Joseph Telushkin.

Just more dribble.

 

[EarlyActs]

You just evade the obvious meaning of the things explained to you.

There was no industrial -caused warming when Taku burst nor when Glacier Bay retreated; both are normal post cataclysm warming , which has happened for millennia.

You haven’t mentioned the Havasu warming. It was in the 8th centAD. In the modern US SW area. There was no industrial-caused source. You have to explain that.

You weren’t directed to the Prager show in general; no wonder you don’t understand much.

 

[eclipseEventSigns]

I can't make any sense out of what point you are trying to make. Names mean nothing.

EXACTLY! It will never make sense.

 

[Frank Robert]

You just evade the obvious meaning of the things explained to you.

There was no industrial -caused warming when Taku burst nor when Glacier Bay retreated; both are normal post cataclysm warming , which has happened for millennia.

I am not a mind reader. You asked try interpreting Taku. My response was:
"What your point? What makes a ice dam breakup 200 years ago pertinent to climate?" As usual you were unable to answer.

What you threw out is a red herring, something intended to distract attention from the real today's problem of global warming. Of course there was no human global warming 200 years ago.

You haven’t mentioned the Havasu warming. It was in the 8th centAD. In the modern US SW area. There was no industrial-caused source. You have to explain that.

There you go again. What is your point? (see above comment). Why would you think an obviously natural event in the 8th century needs to be explained with global warming?

I know you have problems with centuries but so you know human global warming started in the 18 century. Since 1750, humans have increased the abundance of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by nearly 50 percent. The average global CO2 concentration in the atmosphere for 1750 to 1800 was around 278ppm. Today, a net 5 billion metric tons of human-produced carbon remain in the atmosphere each year, raising the global average carbon dioxide concentrations by about 2.3 parts per million per year.

You weren’t directed to the Prager show in general; no wonder you don’t understand much.

Now you are gaslighting. You directed me to Pragerradio.com. My point was the Prager has no standing, i.e, has near zero knowledge, on human global warming. I don't listen to cranks. You have yet to name one climate denial scientist who is researching and written on human global warming.

You have yet to name one climate denial scientist who is researching and written on human global warming.

 

[EarlyActs]

I am not a mind reader. You asked try interpreting Taku. My response was:
"What your point? What makes a ice dam breakup 200 years ago pertinent to climate?" As usual you were unable to answer.

What you threw out is a red herring, something intended to distract attention from the real today's problem of global warming. Of course there was no human global warming 200 years ago.

There you go again. What is your point? (see above comment). Why would you think an obviously natural event in the 8th century needs to be explained with global warming?

I know you have problems with centuries but so you know human global warming started in the 18 century. Since 1750, humans have increased the abundance of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by nearly 50 percent. The average global CO2 concentration in the atmosphere for 1750 to 1800 was around 278ppm. Today, a net 5 billion metric tons of human-produced carbon remain in the atmosphere each year, raising the global average carbon dioxide concentrations by about 2.3 parts per million per year.


Now you are gaslighting. You directed me to Pragerradio.com. My point was the Prager has no standing, i.e, has near zero knowledge, on human global warming. I don't listen to cranks. You have yet to name one climate denial scientist who is researching and written on human global warming.

You have yet to name one climate denial scientist who is researching and written on human global warming.

You simply don't know how to think.

If major warming occurred, relocating tribes, breaking up glaciers in a major fashion, and there was no human caused sources, what is your conclusion.

re Prager. Of course HE is not the source to be checked. You are too absorbed with yourself to look up any of the people I have quoted and ID'd in addition to the 1100 there, the farmers in France, in Germany, in Holland, who actually know their situation.

Sorry to have to put you on ignore, but it is the only reasonable thing to do.

 

[EarlyActs]

"Kids are testifying"--and as informed as Greta!

The 2030 agenda is the WEF's attempt to eliminate 7/8 of the world population, make the worker class eat insect protein and play video games, while the masters fly around in jets and rule the earth. It is global communism and is a "watermelon": green on the outside and red inside. Thousands of farms and hundreds of thousands of animals are being eliminated if the WEF gets its way. They are also moving millions of illegals to wealthy countries to collapse those countries so that there are no resources to oppose them.

All this in the name of a fear of a supposed climate-change.

They bury thousands of used wind gen props which cannot be recycled and never contributed to the energy need, and they make thousands of African children slave labor lithium battery materials.

 

[EarlyActs]

Thank God that in America we have the rule of We The People and in tacticalcivics.com we still have an understanding that county-based grand juries can form and indict presidents, sheriffs, cabinet members for corruption and evil.

 

[Frank Robert]

You simply don't know how to think.

You do like to gaslight don't you?

If major warming occurred, relocating tribes, breaking up glaciers in a major fashion, and there was no human caused sources, what is your conclusion.

Common sense should tell you that the examples you provided from previous centuries were naturally caused. Here are some of the ways in which it could have happened:
Glaciers can be broken up by various natural sources, including:

1. Melt and Ablation: This is a natural and seasonal part of glacier life. When snow accumulation is less than melt and ablation, the glacier will begin to retreat
2. Calving: This occurs when ice cracks and breaks off into large chunks (icebergs) at the terminus of the glacier
3. Biological Processes: Microbes on the surface of a glacier can reduce the glacier's ability to reflect sunlight back into space, hastening glacier retreat
4. Warm Ocean Water: Tidewater glaciers, which flow through valleys out to sea, are susceptible to retreat at the point where the ice meets relatively warm ocean water
   
   

 

[Frank Robert]

"Kids are testifying"--and as informed as Greta!

They are better informed than you

The 2030 agenda is the WEF's attempt to eliminate 7/8 of the world population, make the worker class eat insect protein and play video games, while the masters fly around in jets and rule the earth. It is global communism and is a "watermelon": green on the outside and red inside. Thousands of farms and hundreds of thousands of animals are being eliminated if the WEF gets its way. They are also moving millions of illegals to wealthy countries to collapse those countries so that there are no resources to oppose them.

All this in the name of a fear of a supposed climate-change.

They bury thousands of used wind gen props which cannot be recycled and never contributed to the energy need, and they make thousands of African children slave labor lithium battery materials.

Sounds like you have entered into never, never, land.

 

[EarlyActs]

More actual climate news:

x.com

x.com

 

[Frank Robert]

More actual climate news:

x.com

x.com

A more appropriate title would be: Actual climate disinformation news

Wide Awake Media has been assessed by Media Bias Fact Check, a website that evaluates the credibility and bias of news sources. According to their analysis, Wide Awake Media has been given a "LOW CREDIBILITY" rating. It is an anonymous online platform that focuses on news and commentary, often delving into conspiracy theories and pseudoscience. The site has been criticized for promoting misinformation, lack of credible sourcing, and making unproven or false claims. For example, it has published articles discussing topics like the World Economic Forum’s ‘Great Reset’ agenda and the role of global entities, which are often associated with conspiracy theories. The site has also failed fact checks, such as a video claiming a Greenpeace co-founder denied human impact on climate change, and a claim that Hamas backers climbed the Israel border wall for a "Day of Jihad", both of which were found to be false. The site generates revenue through advertising, donations, and a shop that sells conspiracy-related merchandise.

Wide Awake Media has failed several fact checks, including:

1. A video claiming that a Greenpeace co-founder denied human impact on climate change. This claim was found to be false1
2. A claim that Hamas backers climbed the Israel border wall for a "Day of Jihad". This claim was also found to be false1

These instances of misinformation contribute to the site's low credibility rating and its classification as a right-biased conspiracy-pseudoscience site: Source: MediaBiasFactCheck.com

​

Wide Awake Media is a website that has gained notoriety for spreading conspiracy theories and misinformation. Let’s delve into the details:

Background:

• Wide Awake Media initially operated as a Telegram channel, where it sold anti-vaccine and anti-lockdown merchandise.
• However, it later shifted its focus to climate change denial and rapidly gained a large following on Elon Musk’s X platform.

Climate Change Denial:

• Wide Awake Media now frequently shares articles and video clips highlighting infamous conspiracy theorists and climate deniers with ties to the fossil fuel industry.
• It has used climate-denying posts on Twitter to promote its merchandise, including a shirt that reads: “The Climate Scam MADE WITH 100% FAKE SCIENCE”.

Terms of Service Violation:

Buy Me A Coffee, the fundraising platform used by Wide Awake Media, restricts content that contains harmful misinformation, including climate change denial. Despite this, the account continues to produce conspiracy theory content that violates these terms .​

Source: MediaBiasFactCheck.com

 

[EarlyActs]

https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1753863552790618203?s=20

“climate change is real and natural…”

 

[EarlyActs]

https://x.com/wideawake_media/status/1754873572130967702?s=20

If you are not familiar, when you listen to someone like this from Germany, they are usually a person with a masters degree by the time they were 18.