The First Time In Us History That Kids Are Testifying In Court About The Effects Of Climate Change On Their Wellbeing.

[EarlyActs]

For Frank R:
Re the widespread acceptance of fraudulence

x.com

x.com

1, the fraud that a vax was helping when Ivermectin and zinc was the answer
2, the fraud that underreported the actual numbers of deaths
3, the fraud that other associated deaths were actually bc of covid
4, the disappearance of flu statistics for all periods in question (I saw this first hand working in respiratory therapy)

Our global society has become mesmerized by chronic fraud so that globalists can do as they like while enslaving and harming the rest. It is done about cosmology, geology, climate, politics, media, gender, crime, the Constitutions of sovereign statesetc etc etc

 

[Frank Robert]

Don't you think the ratio would be important? I do.

It would only be important if it were not deceit and disinformation. As usual you are only able to regurgitate fossil fuel industry disinformation w/o zero facts to back anything you have claimed.

If mans contribution is a drop in the bucket...

Who told you man's contribution is a drop in the bucket. If that were true there would be tons of university and scientific research. You have not been able to produce any for the simple reason none exists.

then why impose all the restrictions on people...

What restrictions are you talking about?

.unless you need man made climate change to be an excuse for what

The facts are solid, you are a chronic complainer but when asked to back up your claims you are unable to do so.

the satanic WEF globalist want to accomplish.

You are so far out of touch with reality along with your satanic claims we should just humor you.

But, and a big IF...if mans contrubution towers over natural climate change factors such as volcanos

It is not an "if" it is a fact. That you are unable to comprehend that it is fact doesn't change that it is a fact.

Are you advocating that can control natural causes such as volcanoes?

then perhaps we should bag cow farts.

Sounds like that "cow bag" would be a perfect fit for you.

PERSONALLY, and with all the lies, assumptions, phony statistics, Media foolishness, and economic chicanery that's been going on for DECADES, it's my opinion that NOBODY has any idea one way or another. It hasn't been that long since the "Climate experts" were projecting another Ice Age. BUT HEY!!! believe what you want (you will anyway). and the world will go on anyway.

The only lies are from purveyors of the deceit and disinformation bought and paid for by the fossil fuel industry. You have not been able produce any support for the any of your claims except laughter and in some cases uncontrollable laughter.

 

[EarlyActs]

It would only be important if it were not deceit and disinformation. As usual you are only able to regurgitate fossil fuel industry disinformation w/o zero facts to back anything you have claimed.

Who told you man's contribution is a drop in the bucket. If that were true there would be tons of university and scientific research. You have not been able to produce any for the simple reason none exists.

What restrictions are you talking about?

The facts are solid, you are a chronic complainer but when asked to back up your claims you are unable to do so.

You are so far out of touch with reality along with your satanic claims we should just humor you.

It is not an "if" it is a fact. That you are unable to comprehend that it is fact doesn't change that it is a fact.

Are you advocating that can control natural causes such as volcanoes?


Sounds like that "cow bag" would be a perfect fit for you.

The only lies are from purveyors of the deceit and disinformation bought and paid for by the fossil fuel industry. You have not been able produce any support for the any of your claims except laughter and in some cases uncontrollable laughter.

The expression "fossil fuel" industry is obsolete. It has been shown that the process is abiogenesis, and that it can form in a year. The expression is a very combined confusion of cosmology, geology, natural processes, chemistry, etc, that should be abandoned as infantile. Meanwhile it villified the engine that has blessed so many people through the free market.

 

[Frank Robert]

x.com

x.com

My God, another conspiracy theorist nut. Is that the best you guys can come up with?

 

[Frank Robert]

The expression "fossil fuel" industry is obsolete.

"Fossil fuel industry" is a description.

It has been shown that the process is abiogenesis,

Abibogeneis is the original evolution of life or living organisms from inorganic or inanimate substance. If you want to connect it fossil fuels you need to explain how and why you think it is.

and that it can form in a year.

???????????????????????

The expression is a very combined confusion of cosmology, geology, natural processes, chemistry, etc, that should be abandoned as infantile. Meanwhile it villified the engine that has blessed so many people through the free market.

The comes from confusion is your comment.

 

[EarlyActs]

I would like to reflect for a moment on what the climate panic has done to society. In August near Juneau AK, a glacier shoulder had a small collapse, about 1000 ft above the city. This loosened the ice 'gate' of a basin called Suicide Basin which the authorities watch by camera, because it can overflow in summers. There is a lake downstream which can hold some of this, but it overflowed below the lake, too, and there were some riverbanks recarved and 8 structures were affected.

The climate pannickers showed damage-porn for weeks, the condominium that collapsed. This was truly the face of the crisis!

I went that week to help clean up a home that had its lower floor invaded 5 ft, although no change to their bank. The owner explained that when they built 20 years ago, they were greeted their first summer to a 2 ft invasion. They took this to heart when building. The local residents only know of one other such in the previous generation.

You can graph such statistics and see that it is not much of a crisis. There are 40K people in Juneau and 60K structures.

Meanwhile across the globe that month, Lahina was torched. It was called another sign of climate change, as was the arsonist in Canada who was finally imprisoned this month for setting a dozen forest fires as propaganda that there was climate change. Lahina is a crisis caused by a corrupt government. But it was more useful to the climate panic than Juneau, because as I said, there was very little damage. So Juneau, an actual natural event, was dropped, and Lahina was now the face of the crisis in the media.

That's how the game is played. It has very little to do with reality on the ground. It is all about massive gov control.

 

[EarlyActs]

My God, another conspiracy theorist nut. Is that the best you guys can come up with?

What actual facts are you talking about?

Do you know the climate history of the SW US in the 8th century?

 

[Frank Robert]

No they were much higher before humans. For source, see my X stream and look for the Australian Dr Plime.

If you have links to university and/or scientific research, provide them and I will comment on them. I do not do X.

 

[CrowCross]

It would only be important if it were not deceit and disinformation. As usual you are only able to regurgitate fossil fuel industry disinformation w/o zero facts to back anything you have claimed.

Who told you man's contribution is a drop in the bucket. If that were true there would be tons of university and scientific research. You have not been able to produce any for the simple reason none exists.

What restrictions are you talking about?

The facts are solid, you are a chronic complainer but when asked to back up your claims you are unable to do so.

You are so far out of touch with reality along with your satanic claims we should just humor you.

It is not an "if" it is a fact. That you are unable to comprehend that it is fact doesn't change that it is a fact.

Are you advocating that can control natural causes such as volcanoes?


Sounds like that "cow bag" would be a perfect fit for you.

The only lies are from purveyors of the deceit and disinformation bought and paid for by the fossil fuel industry. You have not been able produce any support for the any of your claims except laughter and in some cases uncontrollable laughter.

If you don't have the ratios of natural to human "climate gases"....please go away.
You parrot all these web sites...present it as truth....yet don't have the ratios.

 

[EarlyActs]

"Fossil fuel industry" is a description.

Abibogeneis is the original evolution of life or living organisms from inorganic or inanimate substance. If you want to connect it fossil fuels you need to explain how and why you think it is.

???????????????????????

The comes from confusion is your comment.

The fact that petroleum can form in a year is documented in oil industry journals in the 50s in 60s. One article was about a site or experiment in UT. If you search creationwiki.com you will find it.

There is no confusion sir. It is an attempt to reverence the earth as extremely old and fragile, when in fact there are massive deposits to work with. The reason for the suppression of this knowledge, is partly Rockefeller marketing (he made the statement in the 1890s--eighteen hundred nineties--that the best way to make millions in the fuel industry was to declare 'fossil fuels' scarce, to drive the price up.) It is also partly the suppression of cataclysmic geology, which is a documented reality when a person studies Pellegrini on tectonics and Bretz on cataclysmic upheaval. What conventional science says is science vs reality is astonishing, but on the petroleum question, it is a set-up to make us think that fossil fuels are so rare and difficult that we must move on.

Pellegrini was buried for 100 years and Bretz was denied a Ph.D. for some 60 years, and banned by the USGS. I recently debated someone here who said that Bretz and his geology pals were all lovey-dovey, and a U of Alberta professor commented and documented that it was actually quite a stormy conflict. The scientist left this forum as soon as that was posted.

See the pattern? If it doesn't match the conventional science established in the late 1800s (an attempt to dislodge Genesis), then it is villified and suppressed until later when it is harmless. That is the actual culture of science that we now live in, which has made all these other frauds so palatable. Even disagreements are reshaped, recasted, to fit the conventional narrative.

 

[EarlyActs]

If you have links to university and/or scientific research, provide them and I will comment on them. I do not do X.

What do you think suppression and freedom of speech is about? This is silly. Science never dismisses a source, and anyway it is not that X is the source; X is just an alternate media that Blackrock cannot pay to shut down.

When Fox was condemned for the 'myth' of election fraud last year, no one seemed to notice that Blackrock owned Fox as well, so it was merely a shift of money, no loss. This week a Ph.D. in electrical engineering stood at the GA supreme court and showed that the election machines can be hacked in under a minute with a ball point pen. We now have reports that all of them were illegal in that they were connected to the internet.

Q: do you think for yourself or for Blackrock?

I gave you names and as a scientist you know that the rational approach is not to get quotes from me but to do your own work and find them. Also look up Patrick Moore (the Greenpeace founder), and also B Ljungborg of Sweden. Pragerradio.com's site also has a complete list of peer-reviewed scientists from all around who are suppressed by conventional media on climate. Prager is an independent media following, which is irrelevant to whether the claims are true, I just wanted you to know why I referenced that.

 

[Frank Robert]

I would like to reflect for a moment on what the climate panic has done to society. In August near Juneau AK, a glacier shoulder had a small collapse, about 1000 ft above the city. This loosened the ice 'gate' of a basin called Suicide Basin which the authorities watch by camera, because it can overflow in summers. There is a lake downstream which can hold some of this, but it overflowed below the lake, too, and there were some riverbanks recarved and 8 structures were affected.

The climate pannickers showed damage-porn for weeks, the condominium that collapsed. This was truly the face of the crisis!

I went that week to help clean up a home that had its lower floor invaded 5 ft, although no change to their bank. The owner explained that when they built 20 years ago, they were greeted their first summer to a 2 ft invasion. They took this to heart when building. The local residents only know of one other such in the previous generation.

You can graph such statistics and see that it is not much of a crisis. There are 40K people in Juneau and 60K structures.

Meanwhile across the globe that month, Lahina was torched. It was called another sign of climate change, as was the arsonist in Canada who was finally imprisoned this month for setting a dozen forest fires as propaganda that there was climate change. Lahina is a crisis caused by a corrupt government. But it was more useful to the climate panic than Juneau, because as I said, there was very little damage. So Juneau, an actual natural event, was dropped, and Lahina was now the face of the crisis in the media.

That's how the game is played. It has very little to do with reality on the ground. It is all about massive gov control.

Who are the climate panicing? Are they published scientists? I looked up the Juneau floods here is what I found.

IS CLIMATE CHANGE TO BLAME?​

Climate change is melting glaciers. A study released this year suggested significant melting by the end of this century amid current climate change trends, and a separate report indicated that glaciers in parts of the Himalayas are melting at unprecedented rates.​

​

But the relationship between the changing climate and glacial outburst floods like the one in Juneau is complicated, scientists say.​

​

The basin where the rain and meltwater collect was formerly covered by Suicide Glacier, which used to contribute ice to the Mendenhall Glacier. Smaller glaciers, like Suicide Glacier, respond more rapidly to changes in climate and the retreat of Suicide Glacier exposed the basin, Hood said.​

​

But the floods that occur “really have nothing to do with climate change and glacier melt directly,” he said.​

​

“The phenomenon itself is caused by climate, but the individual floods don’t have anything to do with climate because they’re basically just the case where water is filling up a basin and then draining at some point during the summer,” he said.​

​

So tell us again who are panicing?

​

​

 

[Frank Robert]

The fact that petroleum can form in a year is documented in oil industry journals in the 50s in 60s. One article was about a site or experiment in UT. If you search creationwiki.com you will find it.

If you want to make scientific claims please use scientific sites.

... petroleum, like coal and natural gas, is a nonrenewable source of energy. It took millions of years for it to form, and when it is extracted and consumed, there is no way for us to replace it.​

There is no confusion sir. It is an attempt to reverence the earth as extremely old and fragile, when in fact there are massive deposits to work with. The reason for the suppression of this knowledge, is partly Rockefeller marketing (he made the statement in the 1890s--eighteen hundred nineties--that the best way to make millions in the fuel industry was to declare 'fossil fuels' scarce, to drive the price up.) It is also partly the suppression of cataclysmic geology, which is a documented reality when a person studies Pellegrini on tectonics and Bretz on cataclysmic upheaval. What conventional science says is science vs reality is astonishing, but on the petroleum question, it is a set-up to make us think that fossil fuels are so rare and difficult that we must move on.
Pellegrini was buried for 100 years and Bretz was denied a Ph.D. for some 60 years, and banned by the USGS. I recently debated someone here who said that Bretz and his geology pals were all lovey-dovey, and a U of Alberta professor commented and documented that it was actually quite a stormy conflict. The scientist left this forum as soon as that was posted.

See the pattern? If it doesn't match the conventional science established in the late 1800s (an attempt to dislodge Genesis), then it is villified and suppressed until later when it is harmless. That is the actual culture of science that we now live in, which has made all these other frauds so palatable. Even disagreements are reshaped, recasted, to fit the conventional narrative.

Science is quite on religion. If some scientists are anti religious, it is on them not on science.

You have not refuted that it takes fossil fuels millions of years to form.

 

[Frank Robert]

What do you think suppression and freedom of speech is about? This is silly. Science never dismisses a source, and anyway it is not that X is the source; X is just an alternate media that Blackrock cannot pay to shut down.

You are entailed to educate yourself on "X" but you should not expect anyone else to do so.

When Fox was condemned for the 'myth' of election fraud last year, no one seemed to notice that Blackrock owned Fox as well, so it was merely a shift of money, no loss. This week a Ph.D. in electrical engineering stood at the GA supreme court and showed that the election machines can be hacked in under a minute with a ball point pen. We now have reports that all of them were illegal in that they were connected to the internet.

Q: do you think for yourself or for Blackrock?

I do not watch Fox or any other TV news.

I gave you names and as a scientist you know that the rational approach is not to get quotes from me but to do your own work and find them.

That is not the way things work. If you have a scientific point to make, such as your fossil fuel in a year remark. I can look that up which I did and found that you were wrong. Now if you can provide actual studies to dispute it, I can look them up and we can have a conversation about it.

Also look up Patrick Moore (the Greenpeace founder), and also B Ljungborg of Sweden. Pragerradio.com's site also has a complete list of peer-reviewed scientists from all around who are suppressed by conventional media on climate. Prager is an independent media following, which is irrelevant to whether the claims are true, I just wanted you to know why I referenced that.

Main stream media is not science. If the scientist has published in scientific journals you can find them on google.scholar and you can review not only their work but what scientists have have cited about their work regardless of what main stream media has to say about them.

Not sure if this is the same Prager but if it is he certainly not an scientist or an uninterested party.

US ‘university’ spreads climate lies and receives millions from rightwing donors

PragerU is not accredited but has become a key tool in pushing false claims to youngsters – and raked in $200m from 2018 to 2022

www.theguardian.com

 

[EarlyActs]

Here is the crock about e.vehicles:

It’s all about Biden money and communist dictatorship. Climate change is a psy op; that means it is a military action to defeat the US.

 

[EarlyActs]

If you want to make scientific claims please use scientific sites.

... petroleum, like coal and natural gas, is a nonrenewable source of energy. It took millions of years for it to form, and when it is extracted and consumed, there is no way for us to replace it.​

Science is quite on religion. If some scientists are anti religious, it is on them not on science.

You have not refuted that it takes fossil fuels millions of years to form.

The cataclysm was a few thousand ago. “Mega flora was suddenly buried and encased in ice.”—Alaska State Museum. Look up the Alaska Boneyard, where this a bit more visible with piles there.

The UT tests showed it is simple math: pressure x time. High pressure means low time. They tried several rates.

Don’t be a Blackrock fool.

 

[EarlyActs]

You are entailed to educate yourself on "X" but you should not expect anyone else to do so.

I do not watch Fox or any other TV news.

That is not the way things work. If you have a scientific point to make, such as your fossil fuel in a year remark. I can look that up which I did and found that you were wrong. Now if you can provide actual studies to dispute it, I can look them up and we can have a conversation about it.


Main stream media is not science. If the scientist has published in scientific journals you can find them on google.scholar and you can review not only their work but what scientists have have cited about their work regardless of what main stream media has to say about them.

Not sure if this is the same Prager but if it is he certainly not an scientist or an uninterested party.

US ‘university’ spreads climate lies and receives millions from rightwing donors

PragerU is not accredited but has become a key tool in pushing false claims to youngsters – and raked in $200m from 2018 to 2022

www.theguardian.com

The Guardian??? You have to be kidding.

His list of scientists is about 1100 I believe.

 

[EarlyActs]

Did you not understand the Juneau radio host response to record cold? He sighed, he wept. Bc it means warming is a fraud and he has no other pursuit than to make sure it is true (followed) in spite of facts.

It is a psy- op to ruin the West. The Davos conference plans that. So does the WEF. Schwab is a German Nazi family child and eco-radical. They want world population to be 1B.

 

[EarlyActs]

Three peer reviewed papers referenced by Newman:

New Papers ‘Completely Undermine’ the So-Called Settled Science on Manmade Global Warming: Alex Newman

The argument that climate change is ’settled science' is no more. Scientists and researchers are now stepping forward to declare that the narrative is fake.

t.co

 

[EarlyActs]

Is There A Climate Crisis? - Part 2

The Human Factor

t.co