John 10:11-16 [NLT]
11 "I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd sacrifices his life for the sheep. 12 A hired hand will run when he sees a wolf coming. He will abandon the sheep because they don't belong to him and he isn't their shepherd. And so the wolf attacks them and scatters the flock. 13 The hired hand runs away because he's working only for the money and doesn't really care about the sheep. 14 "I am the good shepherd; I know my own sheep, and they know me, 15 just as my Father knows me and I know the Father. So I sacrifice my life for the sheep. 16 I have other sheep, too, that are not in this sheepfold. I must bring them also. They will listen to my voice, and there will be one flock with one shepherd.
FACT CHECKING TIME:
How does that prove LIMITED vs GENERAL Atonement?
Let me offer a GENERAL ATONEMENT exegesis for you to refute:
Throughout Scripture, "sheep" are a symbol for God's Chosen People (the nation of Israel). So Jesus is telling a Jewish audience that He is the "good shepherd" (anointed leader) because He sacrifices His life for God's People. The Wolves (worldly leaders, like Rome) harm rather than protect God's people. In John 10:26 Jesus will make the point that those who do not believe are "not HIS sheep" ... they are still sheep (Israel) so the "Good Shepherd" still died for them, but they are not HIS SHEEP so they do not follow and do not receive eternal life. Sufficient for ALL (UNIVERSAL ATONEMENT) but EFFECTIVE for only some [
I have no idea what limits the efficacy of the blood in UNIVERSAL ATONEMENT ... faith? ... it is not covered in these verses.]
We [Reformed] are often very sloppy in our handling of scripture on the subject of Limited Atonement; engaging in eisegesis worthy of an Arminian.
I invite those more knowledgeable to shred my argument. I created it in hopes that someone could defeat it.