Questioning the reformation!

[Arial]

As the "Apostle to the Gentiles" which Paul called himself. He was the dividing line between the end of the 70 weeks prophecy and the surge of evangelistic coverage that went abroad into all the Gentile nations. God's commission for Paul in the Jerusalem temple to leave Jerusalem and concentrate on evangelizing Gentiles ended the 70 weeks prophecy in AD 37.

I know you were asked a question and you answered it. The question came from off topic and this veers even further off. Not a reprimand but a reminder of the OP. Questioning the Reformation.
Thanks.

 

[donadams]

You do not seem to recognize or acknowledge that the Reformation sparked by Luther---a priest---when he posted his theses against the sale of indulgences came from within the Catholic church in an attempt to reform a very corrupt and 10,000 miles off of scripture, (they didn't even give sermons teaching from the word of God on the word of God, but mumbled often inarticulate and in Latin which most could not speak or understand, nothing but traditions of men)to reform the Catholic church and put it back on solid scriptural ground. Rather than participate in such reformation, obviously not giving a hoot about it or scripture, they simply kicked out the ones attempting that reform. All the most prominent reformers were Catholic. Later they did do some of their own reforms within, and some they gave the appearance of doing but merely kept hidden.

The Protestant reformation came about by the Catholics doing. Brave men put their very lives and wellbeing on the line to give back to the people what God had given them through the NT apostles what the them and the Catholic church had taken away. If they couldn't bring about the reforms from within because they were kicked out, they would do it by completely breaking away from the totalitarian corruption and abuse. The solas were not the beginning. They came about because of and during.

"The church was taught by Christ for three years-----' is a statement not clarified openly as to its meaning, and supported by nothing but hearsay.

Apostolic tradition the truth received by the apostles from the mouth of Christ in person not from scripture

There have been many reforms
Always on the level of church discipline, law, and administration

But there can be no reformation of the church herself, her nature, or truth, dogma, Christian faith!
Eph 4:5 Jude 1:3

Thanks

 

[Arial]

Apostolic tradition the truth received by the apostles from the mouth of Christ in person not from scripture

This is not a complete sentence and therefore makes no sense. It would be a complete sentence if it ended in one of these (.) and if it were answering a question and the question was presented so readers knew what you meant. But there was no question.

There have been many reforms
Always on the level of church discipline, law, and administration

That is apropos of nothing. You seem to have trouble focusing and staying on topic.

But there can be no reformation of the church herself, her nature, or truth, dogma, Christian faith!
Eph 4:5 Jude 1:3

Address the post you are responding to.