Runningman
Well Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2023
- Messages
- 1,682
- Reaction score
- 586
- Points
- 113
- Faith
- Unitarian Christian
None of them say he is God in their contexts. They say "Son of God." The Son of God doesn't mean God.No you aren't. You are given scriptures that show Jesus is God. You say Jesus is nowhere worshiped as God in the Bible. YOu are shown scriptures that directly say He was.
I am using the authority of the Bible to give the full counsel of scripture that explain the true meaning of verses/passages that are being isolated from their context. If a verse shows Jesus is being bowed to and the translators decided to use the word "worship" for that, but then there are examples of Jesus not being God then the worship can't be understood as being a refence to deity.You come back with a scripture from somewhere else that says Jesus has a God or calls God His Father. As if to say, "But look what is says over here!" Completely ignoring the fact of those scriptures that rebutted what YOU said about Jesus. That is pitting scripture against scripture. Not sola scriptura, which you are also misusing as to its meaning. Sola scriptura has to do with the authority of the Bible in all things for the church and its doctrines and practices.
We can even look at what God, Jesus, and the apostles taught. Did any of them teach Christians to worship Jesus? No. Did Jesus ask for worship? No. Did Jesus talk about who to worship and, when he did, who did he say to worship and who is seeking worship? The Father. There isn't even a hint at worshipping the Holy Spirit. Why doesn't it concern you that the only one in your Trinity who worship is taught to be directed to is the Father if there are others who make up your godhead?
John 4
23But a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and in truth, for the Father is seeking such as these to worship Him.
That's what I agree with what the Bible is like, too, but actually it's you who is distorting the scripture. I suspect you aren't doing it intentionally. There are masses of people, some estimated tens of thousands of denominations, who are wrestling over the Bible saying they all have the truth with a sincere look on their face, but if all put in a room together they would eat each other alive, so to speak.What you are missing in your interpretive method is continuity of Scripture. The Bible is one continuous book and it is the story of redemption, as it unfolds in history (actual historic events and people, that take place in our time and world) from beginning to end. It comes from God in who there is no contradiction, no shadow of turning, and exists in His wisdom and knowledge and power, in full, before it ever comes to pass in our world. As an analogy----someone writing a novel. The author knows the story, the characters, the events, and you won't find the protagonist being said to born in Iowa and seven chapters in, all of a sudden being born is California, first her name is Cleo but the writer periodically decides to give her a different name. IOW the facts are kept consistent and not contradictory. So it is with the Bible. Its truth and its message are God's to us, and there are no contradictions. You consistently use scriptures as contradictions to other clear truths.
So what makes you think that you somehow have the correct understanding of all of this when even the most learned, well-read, well-studied, doctors, theologians, and translators of Trinitarianism conclude the Trinity is a paradox? If it's a paradox the premise is flawed and God cannot be known or truly understood using scripture. Fortunately, the Bible doesn't actually say what Trinitarian commentators say it does.