JIM
Well Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2023
- Messages
- 1,811
- Reaction score
- 188
- Points
- 63
- Age
- 85
- Location
- Prescott, AZ
- Faith
- Christian
- Politics
- Conservative
First, I understand (sort of) why the "Word" is used in John 1. But that does not change the fact of who Jesus was before He took upon Himself the physical body of the human being. Second, I believe that God is Spirit; the Holy Spirit is Spirit; and I believe that Jesus, the Word, before the incarnation was Spirit. I believe they are each three different, distinct, divine Spirits. Call them Spirit 1, Spirit 2 and Spirit 3. When Jesus was born, He became a human being. A human being is flesh and blood with a spirit. The flesh and blood are from the physical reproductive process; the spirit comes from God. For the discussion here I won't bother to distinguish between soul and spiritIf the Holy Spirit is the third person of the Trinity, then all three are not the third person of the Trinity. What Christianity teaches is that those three are spirit----that is, not material as we know material. They are invisible. It does not teach that all three are divine Spirit. What you present is a Trinity being described as a non- Trinity. The three persons are all equal in essence but are three distinct. Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. (The expression is never given as Father, Word and Holy Spirit.) "Word" is used in John 1 for a specific reason, which I gave in another post. I will do so again if you would like.
In a manner of speaking, our spirit is not separate from us, but it is distinct. It is not life, per se. Animals have life, they do not have a spirit. And this is where the distinction between soul and spirit lies. But again, I don't want to get into that discussion. The significant point here is that I believe that each and every spirit of mankind comes separately and distinctly from God (Zech 12:1; Eccl 12:7). When exactly I am not sure. But likely it comes at conception or perhaps when blood first begins to flow in the fetus. God says the life is in the blood (Lev 17:11, 14).Yes, But our spirit is not an entity separate from the whole of us. Spirit (little "s") is used in Scripture as "life" and also in the same way as "heart" when it is denoting the usness of us.
When it says "the Word became flesh and dwelt among us" (John 1:14), I believe that to be literally true. I believe that the Word, Spirit 2, took on the body of a human being as the fetus in Mary's womb. I can't prove that, but it is the only thing that makes sense to me. I believe that Hebrews 2:14 makes the same claim when it says there, "Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same thing". I believe that the "he, himself" in that verse was the Word, Spirit 2, the preincarnate Jesus.
As I said, the human being is composed of flesh and blood, the physical body, and the spirit. The body from the parents, the spirit from God. In the case of Jesus, His spirit came not from God as does ours, rather His spirit was the Word, Spirit 2. It came to earth and took on the body of the human being. While on earth, Jesus was in the form of a human being with flesh and blood, by Mary having conceived by the Holy Spirit (Matt 1:20). He was first identified as the Son of God, when He was baptized by John the Baptist in the Jordan River. I truly believe that He was none other than Spirit 2 in the body of the human being Jesus.Of course He did. If he didn't he would not be alive and he would not have feelings, desires, emotions, motion, speech, etc. But his human spirit was not divine or the two natures would have been mixed. And here you have made the Spirit incarnate, not the Son (Word if you prefer.) Jesus was fully human in the incarnation (flesh and blood) and as the eternal Son was fully divine.
I disagree with that. Even though I believe that His spirit as a human being was indeed the Word, Spirit 2, I think He performed signs, wonders and miracles, not by His own power, but by the power of the Holy Spirit. I can go into much more detail on that if necessary, but for now I will just refer to Luke 4:1 which tells us that Jesus, the man, was said to be "full of the Holy Spirit". Here I point out that this the Holy Spirit, Spirit 3, in my distinctions of Spirit 1, Spirit 2 and Spirit 3, the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.Scripture also refers to mankind as being a little lower than the angels. That is what it means. He came down to our level. He was able to perform sings, wonders and miracles because even though He is fully human he is also fully God.
Not quite true. I hope that you will understand from what I have said here, that the Holy Spirit did not become His Spirit. The spirit of Jesus was the Word, Spirit 2, As a man, Jesus was empowered by the Holy Spirit, Spirit 3. He was not indwelt by the Holy Spirit. He was empowered by the Holy Spirit. The apostles, on the other hand, were both indwelt by the Holy Spirit as all saints are, and empowered by the Holy Spirit as only a select few were.Could be. But the Holy Spirit indwelt the apostles---those he did not ever become their spirit and you say He did in Christ.
I hope that helps you understand what I believe.