• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

Justification

The fact that we can repent and be declared righteous through faith when we have not had perfect obedience means God's law does not demand perfect obedience. Even if someone managed to have perfect obedience to God's law, then they still would not earn their righteousness as a wage (Romans 4:1-5), so there is nothing about the law permitting imperfect obedience that means that righteousness is earned by our works. The reason why we do not earn our righteousness by obeying God's law is not because we can't have perfect obedience to it, but because it was never give as a way of earning our righteousness. In Romans 2:13, only the doers of God's law will be declared righteous, so while we do not earn our righteousness as the result of obeying it, there is nevertheless a reason for why our righteousness requires us to choose to be doers of the law. Our obedience to God's law is the way to have faith and it is by that faith that we are declared righteous, not through perfect obedience.

In Deuteronomy 11:26-32, the difference between being under God's blessing or His curse is not based on whether or not we have perfect obedience, but on whether we serve God or chase after other gods. While everyone in the OT fell short of perfect obedience, everyone being under God's curse does not reflect the reality of what is recorded about those who served God, just those who chased after other gods. According to Deuteronomy 27-28, the way to be blessed is by relying on God's law while the way to be cursed is by not relying on it, so you should not interpret Galatians 3:10 as Paul quoting from that passage in order to support a point that is arguing against it, but rather those who rely on works of the law instead of relying on God's law come under the curse of not relying on God's law. While we do not earn eternal life as the result of obeying God's law, the Bible is nevertheless abundantly clear that obedience to it is the way to have eternal life without needing perfect obedience.
“The gospel is saying that, what man cannot do in order to be accepted with God, this God himself has done for us in the person of Jesus Christ. To be acceptable to God we must present to God a life of perfect and unceasing obedience to his will. The gospel declares that Jesus has done this for us. For God to be righteous he must deal with our sin. This also he has done for us in Jesus. The holy law of God was lived out perfectly for us by Christ, and its penalty was paid perfectly for us by Christ. The living and dying of Christ for us, and this alone is the only basis of our acceptance with God.”- Graeme Goldsworthy, Gospel and Kingdom, p. 86
 
I like Hodge a great deal but I do not think he is correct to make righteousness and justification synonymous. Properly defined, righteousness makes one justifiable, not justified. To be justified is to have the legal ability to stand for trial or judgment. Having legal standing by which someone might plead their case does not mean they will be found innocent, guiltless, otherwise exonerated, or righteous. There are places in the NT where the two are separated.

Romans 5:18
So then as through one transgression there resulted condemnation to all men, even so through one act of righteousness there resulted justification of life to all men.

Jesus' act of righteousness resulted in our justification. Why didn't Paul maintain the consistency of word and write Jesus' act of righteousness resulted in the righteousness of all men? Because his act of righteousness does not result in the righteousness of all men but it does reult in our justification.

I would also recommend discerning the context of the New Testament's mentions of justification because there is a justification that occurs solely by the blood of Christ and there is also a justification that occurs by faith of the regenerate. Not the same to conditions and not the same two justifications. Not to be conflated. The justified will be justified. Those justified by his blood are also justified by faith (which is gifted to them by God).

Hodges said, "The obedience which the law demands is called righteousness," but Paul maintained that "a man is justified by faith apart from the works of the Law" (Rom. 3:28). The only mention of "faith" in the opening post is where it quotes Paul's "The law is not of faith: but, the man that doeth them shall live in them," (Gal. 3:12 quoting Lev. 18:5), but faith both preceded the law (Abraham was justified by faith, and was an inherent inextricable part of the Law. The three are not mutually exclusive conditions because the righteous live by faith..... but that does not make righteousness and justification identical.

I have legal standing to stand before God because of Jesus. I have been made righteous because of Jesus. I have more than one reason to be thankful for Jesus. :cool:
 
I like Hodge a great deal but I do not think he is correct to make righteousness and justification synonymous. Properly defined, righteousness makes one justifiable, not justified. To be justified is to have the legal ability to stand for trial or judgment. Having legal standing by which someone might plead their case does not mean they will be found innocent, guiltless, otherwise exonerated, or righteous. There are places in the NT where the two are separated.

Romans 5:18
So then as through one transgression there resulted condemnation to all men, even so through one act of righteousness there resulted justification of life to all men.

Jesus' act of righteousness resulted in our justification. Why didn't Paul maintain the consistency of word and write Jesus' act of righteousness resulted in the righteousness of all men? Because his act of righteousness does not result in the righteousness of all men but it does reult in our justification.

I would also recommend discerning the context of the New Testament's mentions of justification because there is a justification that occurs solely by the blood of Christ and there is also a justification that occurs by faith of the regenerate. Not the same to conditions and not the same two justifications. Not to be conflated. The justified will be justified. Those justified by his blood are also justified by faith (which is gifted to them by God).

Hodges said, "The obedience which the law demands is called righteousness," but Paul maintained that "a man is justified by faith apart from the works of the Law" (Rom. 3:28). The only mention of "faith" in the opening post is where it quotes Paul's "The law is not of faith: but, the man that doeth them shall live in them," (Gal. 3:12 quoting Lev. 18:5), but faith both preceded the law (Abraham was justified by faith, and was an inherent inextricable part of the Law. The three are not mutually exclusive conditions because the righteous live by faith..... but that does not make righteousness and justification identical.

I have legal standing to stand before God because of Jesus. I have been made righteous because of Jesus. I have more than one reason to be thankful for Jesus. :cool:
Understand, but he is crystal clear how a sinner is justified before a Holy God. And that in Christ through Faith Alone apart from works. He also explains that it's not any moral improvement on the sinner or for that matter even on the believers works, but solely and only on the active/passive righteousness of Christ that is imputed, credited, or reckoned and received by Faith Alone.
 
Abram was justified by a faith or labor of love that worked in him, The faith of Christ not of his own he had none that could please God, as it is written. It being the source or power to rise men to new life coming from his storeroom of faith. The gift faith .Previously having none that could please , again not little none, no faith.
Are you familiar with Law & Gospel paradigm?
 
Understand, but he is crystal clear how a sinner is justified before a Holy God. And that in Christ through Faith Alone apart from works. He also explains that it's not any moral improvement on the sinner or for that matter even on the believers works, but solely and only on the active/passive righteousness of Christ that is imputed, credited, or reckoned and received by Faith Alone.
Yep
 
I think so. Two laws working together to create one perfect law. Apart from each other. . . no power to please God .
I will help you. It's about getting the Gospel right. Either we are saved on the sole merits of Christ, which then is received through faith Alone, crediting or imputing Christ's righteousness to the ungodly. Instead of a medieval piety that maintained that while we enter into a state of justice by grace, we then need to satisfy God’s justice by works.

Confusing the law and Gospel contributed to a medieval piety that maintained that while we enter into a state of justice by grace, we then need to satisfy God’s justice by works. Martin Luther found that idea suffocating. Even our best works lack perfect intentions. Christians know this. So the judgment of God became a fearful thing to Luther and others with sensitive consciences.

But upon reading and teaching Scripture, Luther re-discovered Paul’s emphasis on the law and Gospel. In the Gospel itself, God reveals his righteousness (Rom 1:17). That meant (and means) that, in Christ, the righteousness of God clothes us at the moment we believe. We do not need to merit God’s approval. He accepts us in Christ forever. Good works then flow out of a good heart—a good tree produces good fruits.

The law, on the other, hand condemns.

 
I will help you. It's about getting the Gospel right. Either we are saved on the sole merits of Christ, which then is received through faith Alone, crediting or imputing Christ's righteousness to the ungodly. Instead of a medieval piety that maintained that while we enter into a state of justice by grace, we then need to satisfy God’s justice by works.

Confusing the law and Gospel contributed to a medieval piety that maintained that while we enter into a state of justice by grace, we then need to satisfy God’s justice by works. Martin Luther found that idea suffocating. Even our best works lack perfect intentions. Christians know this. So the judgment of God became a fearful thing to Luther and others with sensitive consciences.

But upon reading and teaching Scripture, Luther re-discovered Paul’s emphasis on the law and Gospel. In the Gospel itself, God reveals his righteousness (Rom 1:17). That meant (and means) that, in Christ, the righteousness of God clothes us at the moment we believe. We do not need to merit God’s approval. He accepts us in Christ forever. Good works then flow out of a good heart—a good tree produces good fruits.

The law, on the other, hand condemns.


Amen , Thanks for the reply

I would offer. Two kinds of laws. The letter of the law (death) the law that governs the temporal things seen and the law of new life the unseen law of God the eternal government of faith or power of God .

Redeeming mankind according to the promised three day and night demonstration of the lamb of God

(purple) my offering

Romans 7:6 But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter.

Romans 3:26 To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, (letter of the law) and the justifier (The spirit of the law)of him which believeth in Jesus.

There is a beautiful Psalm a Christian, Christmas wedding song that speaks to the perfect law the just and justifier .coming down on the last day under the Sun

Yoked with Christ he helps us to understand, making wise the simple. His loving commands so pure they enlighten the eyes of His bride

Psalm 19:5-12 Which is as a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, and rejoiceth as a strong man to run a race. His going forth is from the end of the heaven, and his circuit unto the ends of it: and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof. The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple. The statutes of the Lord are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of the Lord is pure, enlightening the eyes. The fear of the Lord is clean, enduring for ever: the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether. More to be desired are they than gold, yea, than much fine gold: sweeter also than honey and the honeycomb.Moreover by them is thy servant warned: and in keeping of them there is great reward.Who can understand his errors? cleanse thou me from secret faults
 
Thanks for sharing. In the Reformed Faith we have the three uses of the Law.

Law

When Luther speaks of law and gospel, he can use these terms to describe a biblical pattern of commands and promises. In his The Freedom of the Christian, Luther explains “that the entire Scripture of God is divided into two parts: commands and promises.” Luther’s close associate Philip Melanchthon will say more directly, “All of Scripture is either Law or Gospel.”[1]

The law refers specifically to the Law of Moses but overlaps conceptually with other commands of God in Scripture. The Gospel refers specifically to the good news about Jesus Christ, but Scripture often contains promises of the gospel (e.g., Gen 3:15).

For Luther and the scriptural authors, the law carries the basic functions of revealing sin (Rom 7:9) and increasing sin (Rom 5:20). It also restrains evil. Luther commends it then when used properly “first to bridle civil transgressions, and then to reveal and to increase spiritual transgressions.”[2]

In the end, the law is meant to show us our need for the Gospel. “For the Law has its terminus,” writes Luther “defining how far it is to go and what it is to achieve, namely, to terrify the impenitent with the wrath and displeasure of God and drive them to Christ.”[3]

This, in part, explains why Luther does not see the Mosaic Law per se as having ongoing force over the Christian: “It is no longer binding on us because it was given only to the people of Israel.”[4] He certainly sees the Ten Commandments as abiding moral laws since, however, they are “written by nature into their hearts.”[5]

And he thinks Moses gives wise laws to Israel. Although they are not binding upon anyone, these laws model wisdom and justice. The reformers will later explain that the ceremonies and civil aspects of law served Israel in their specific location in time and place and as such is no longer binding upon people today as law. Melanchthon too can say that “the entire Law has been abolished.”[6] Luther holds to the same view.

And for Luther, in the new covenant, the Gospel promise means that God gives us the Holy Spirit so that we can live righteously without the law’s condemnation and not for the sake of meriting God’s acceptance of us—but simply because it is good to do so, it serves our neighbour, and it pleases God in a non-meritorious sense.

Since Luther frequently cites and uses the Old Testament, this does not mean he in any way relegates the law to some forgotten realm. No. Luther rather puts law in its God-given place. It threatens and restrains so that we better understand the Gospel of freedom.

Gospel

For Luther, the gospel of grace saves us apart from any works of the law. As his colleague Philip Melancthon wrote, “The Law shows the disease, the Gospel the cure.”[7] The Bible is full of law and gospel, command and promise. The New Testament is not simply gospel, while Old Testament law. As Luther says of the Old Testament: “Here you will find the swaddling cloths and the manger in which Criest lies, and to which the angel points the shepherds [Luke 2:12].”[8]

As a general tendency, Luther admits that the Old Testament emphasizes law, while the New Testament highlights grace. But the Old Testament still promises the Gospel (e.g. Gen 3:15), while the New Testament conveys commands to help us restrain the flesh. In this sense, the categories of law and gospel and the broader categories of command and grace help us make sense of how to read the whole Bible.

The Gospel is God’s approval of us on the basis of God clothing us with the righteousness of Christ. In his 1520 treatise, On The Freedom of the Christian, Luther uses the analogy of marriage. When a bride marries a bridegroom, everything she has belongs to him; and the bridegroom shares with her his whole life. In the Gospel, we give up entirely our sin and Christ gives entirely his righteousness. We are then by this union justified by faith. An alien (foreign) righteousness becomes ours by faith.

Christ is our righteousness. Any works done after our justification matter, according to Luther, because it pleases God (not salvifically) and because we need to love our neighbours. A good tree, he avers, produces good fruit. The law does not need to threaten us anymore. The moral law, however, still guides us in our Christian walk. Hence, Luther will include the Ten Commandments in his catechisms.

Third-use of the law

Luther then had a positive place for law by the very fact that the Ten Commandments stand in central place in his catechism. Other reformers, John Calvin, in particular, would advocate for a more precise way of describing this positive use of the law called the third use of the law.[9]

While the ceremonial and civic aspects of the law have expired since they aimed to preserve charity and justice among Israel and also point to the need of a new law, the Ten Commandments principally correspond to God’s moral law. Everyone knows that murder is wrong, even if they do it. That is part of the fabric of nature because God made nature. It then has a moral order.

These sorts of laws no longer fall upon us as laws under the mosaic law, but as eternal standards of God. Hence, law in this sense has no meritorious use for a Christian but rather a sapiential use—it is wise and good to study God’s law to understand what moral principles we ought to emulate.

Christian Freedom

Luther observed a biblical pattern, and he pressed into the notions of grace and command to help Christians understand the Gospel. The freedom of the Christian means that God grants us all things for our salvation freely. The duty of Christian means that while we live in the flesh, we must serve others and those in authority over us. Scripture stands as the authority over both these overlapping spheres of life.

But confusing law and gospel creates a massive problem for Christians. It makes the law of Moses into a “must” for Christians even though Christ set us free from the yoke of the law. “For unless the Gospel be plainly discerned from the law,” writes Luther, “the true Christian doctrine cannot be kept sound and uncorrupt” (“Galatians” 1962, 145).

The Gospel bestows the Spirit of freedom to the Christian so that we can obey from the heart. The law is not then thrown out but put in its place. Paul explains, “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law” (Gal 5:22–23). Paul commends and even commands good behaviour, but the motivation is grace and the power to obey is Spiritual.

To rebuild the wall of the Mosaic law simply makes one a transgressor of the law (Gal 2:18). It also makes one a legalist. Peter explains, “Now, therefore, why are you putting God to the test by placing a yoke on the neck of the disciples that neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear?” (Acts 15:10). In the next verse, Peter defines the difference that Christ brings, “But we believe that we will be saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus, just as they will” (Acts 15:11).

Peter lays the law of Moses side-by-side with the grace of Christ. He tells us that that the law is a yoke that no one can bear. But the Gospel is grace which we can receive. In Paul’s idiom, “For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery” (Gal 5:1).

Some medieval piety attempted to yoke Christians to human customs. But when law enters as a means of staying within a state of justice, in effect the law becomes the means by which one maintains their salvation. Instead, the Gospel sets us free from such a view. It liberates us from having to obey human customs or the law of Moses to remain in a state of justice. The law is a good guide for the Christian life, but a terrible master; the Lord Jesus sets us free, not law.

Between legalism and antinomianism lies Luther’s Gospel of grace because he rightly discerned the basic pattern that Paul and the Scriptural authors taught. Scripture, the Law of Moses, has authority over the Christian under the terms of the New Covenant. And under this covenant, Christ sets us free from this law or any human law as a yoke over us.

He fulfills what the law pointed to as a good pedagogue “until Christ came” (Gal 3:24). Now that he has come and now that we have the promised Spirit (Gal 3:14), we can serve our Lord Jesus Christ as free men and women.
 
Not for me, you have to read his essay on Justification. Not only does his holds to the imputed righteousness of Christ, he also holds to the imputation of Adam's sin (Double Imputation), as I do. Not a lot of people hold to Double Imputation.

"In the imputation of Adam’s sin to us, of our sins to Christ, and of Christ’s righteousness to believers, the nature of imputation is the same, so that one case illustrates the other" (Hodge: Systematic Theology, 2:194).

That’s good. I was surprised when I saw the terms used but it may just be a matter of that time period usage.
 
This, in part, explains why Luther does not see the Mosaic Law per se as having ongoing force over the Christian: “It is no longer binding on us because it was given only to the people of Israel.”[4] He certainly sees the Ten Commandments as abiding moral laws since, however, they are “written by nature into their hearts.”[5]
I would offer I understand that a little differently it does not destroy the simplicity of the gorsel God saves dying mankind

Not all israel is born again Israel they are the Jews according the things not seen the tier dying flesh and remember in isaiah 62 he propimes to name her a new name . one that is more befiting as the wife of al the nations . Christin residents of the eternal city of Christ prepared by her husband Christ the founder of the city of God

Romans 9:6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:

Romans 2:29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter;(death) whose praise is not of men, but of God.

Isaiah 62:1-2King James Version For Zion's sake will I not hold my peace, and for Jerusalem's sake I will not rest, until the righteousness thereof go forth as brightness, and the salvation thereof as a lamp that burneth.And the Gentiles shall see thy righteousness, and all kings thy glory: and thou shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the Lord shall name

Acts 11:26 And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.

It would seem to be why some Jews were not part of those born again Jews . DNA has no value, .Jesus the Son of man said of his own dying flesh It profits for nothing .What did profit was the powerful work of his Father the "let there be" Yoked with the Son of man Jesus they demonstrated to all the nations of the whole world the power of God's labor of love.

Revelation 2:9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

Are not inward Jews, Christians

Revelation 3:9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
 
I would offer I understand that a little differently it does not destroy the simplicity of the gorsel God saves dying mankind

Not all israel is born again Israel they are the Jews according the things not seen the tier dying flesh and remember in isaiah 62 he propimes to name her a new name . one that is more befiting as the wife of al the nations . Christin residents of the eternal city of Christ prepared by her husband Christ the founder of the city of God

Romans 9:6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:

Romans 2:29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter;(death) whose praise is not of men, but of God.

Isaiah 62:1-2King James Version For Zion's sake will I not hold my peace, and for Jerusalem's sake I will not rest, until the righteousness thereof go forth as brightness, and the salvation thereof as a lamp that burneth.And the Gentiles shall see thy righteousness, and all kings thy glory: and thou shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the Lord shall name

Acts 11:26 And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.

It would seem to be why some Jews were not part of those born again Jews . DNA has no value, .Jesus the Son of man said of his own dying flesh It profits for nothing .What did profit was the powerful work of his Father the "let there be" Yoked with the Son of man Jesus they demonstrated to all the nations of the whole world the power of God's labor of love.

Revelation 2:9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

Are not inward Jews, Christians

Revelation 3:9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
Luther is saying that even though only the Jews were given the stone tablets, it doesn't give an excuse to the gentiles. They also will be judged by the Law, that is written on their hearts, so they are without excuse before God.
 
I think so. Two laws working together to create one perfect law. Apart from each other. . . no power to please God.

I will help you. It's about getting the Gospel right. Either we are saved on the sole merits of Christ, which then is received through faith Alone, crediting or imputing Christ's righteousness to the ungodly. Instead of a medieval piety that maintained that while we enter into a state of justice by grace, we then need to satisfy God’s justice by works.

Confusing the law and Gospel contributed to a medieval piety that maintained that while we enter into a state of justice by grace, we then need to satisfy God’s justice by works. Martin Luther found that idea suffocating. Even our best works lack perfect intentions. Christians know this. So the judgment of God became a fearful thing to Luther and others with sensitive consciences.

But upon reading and teaching Scripture, Luther re-discovered Paul’s emphasis on the law and Gospel. In the Gospel itself, God reveals his righteousness (Rom 1:17). That meant (and means) that, in Christ, the righteousness of God clothes us at the moment we believe. We do not need to merit God’s approval. He accepts us in Christ forever. Good works then flow out of a good heart—a good tree produces good fruits.

The law, on the other, hand condemns.​
Try this: Five Views on Law and Gospel. The whole series is very good, especially for building critical reasoning skills, not just learning about the diversity of orthodox thought within Christendom. Most of this particular book is about the place of the Law in the Christian's life (post gospel conversion) but it is all built on the question of whether the Law is relevant or not before, not just after, conversion.
 
Try this: Five Views on Law and Gospel. The whole series is very good, especially for building critical reasoning skills, not just learning about the diversity of orthodox thought within Christendom. Most of this particular book is about the place of the Law in the Christian's life (post gospel conversion) but it is all built on the question of whether the Law is relevant or not before, not just after, conversion.
I would lean more towards Non-Theonomic Reformed View . . . the law is the perfection of righteousness in Jesus Christ.
 
Luther is saying that even though only the Jews were given the stone tablets, it doesn't give an excuse to the gentiles. They also will be judged by the Law, that is written on their hearts, so they are without excuse before God.
Moses was not a Jew. The word Jew had its beginning with Kings in Israel The peoples choice. Saul turned out as one that sought after other gods of the dead (necromancy). David from the tribe of Judah God's choice.
 
I would lean more towards Non-Theonomic Reformed View . . . the law is the perfection of righteousness in Jesus Christ.
And I toward the theonomic view, but I do not think the two are mutually exclusive. The Law is the perfection of righteousness (foreshadowed) in Jesus AND its principles are to be applied in the life of the regenerate, never considered in opposition to either Jesus or the Spirit.
 
Try this: Five Views on Law and Gospel. The whole series is very good, especially for building critical reasoning skills, not just learning about the diversity of orthodox thought within Christendom. Most of this particular book is about the place of the Law in the Christian's life (post gospel conversion) but it is all built on the question of whether the Law is relevant or not before, not just after, conversion.
What are the five views named?
 
And I toward the theonomic view, but I do not think the two are mutually exclusive. The Law is the perfection of righteousness (foreshadowed) in Jesus AND its principles are to be applied in the life of the regenerate, never considered in opposition to either Jesus or the Spirit.
There could be some differences. The law of righteousness is the law of faith (newness of life) it opposes the letter of the law (death) in respect the whole book of law as it is written. It represents the power of Christ 's faith Gods labor of love that works in those yoked with him.

Letter "you shall not or you will suffer and die and not rise to newness of life. The second death, the death of death along with its sufferings of hell

Yoked with Christ he makes or daily suffering the pang of hell lighter

The letter (death) It will not arise in the new incorruptible order and condemn to death another whole creation .The former things here on earth (the temporal) will not be remembered, or ever come to mind

Living hell, living sacrifice. Christ who cannot die suffered the pangs of hell unto death,(not dead) by his wounds we are healed

death and sufferings (hell)

Revelation 20:14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.

There will be no retrial or double jeopardy.
 
Moses was not a Jew. The word Jew had its beginning with Kings in Israel The peoples choice. Saul turned out as one that sought after other gods of the dead (necromancy). David from the tribe of Judah God's choice.
The Stone Tablets was given to Israel, correct?
 
Moses was not a Jew. The word Jew had its beginning with Kings in Israel The peoples choice. Saul turned out as one that sought after other gods of the dead (necromancy). David from the tribe of Judah God's choice.
Generally speaking, the terms Hebrews, Jews, and Israelites all refer to the same people- the nation which sprang from Abraham through Isaac and Jacob, a nation promised and chosen by God in the Old Testament (Genesis 12:1-3). Each term emphasizes some aspect of this people's origin or background.
 
Back
Top