Hazelelponi
Well Known Member
I’m extremely scientific.
While that's wonderful, this however is a topic where people are talking about the justification secured by Jesus Christ in His death and resurrection for His people, decreed in eternity past, and applied to the elect in time through means that God gives us as a gift - that means is faith.
Euclid's scientific thoughts are not on the radar. It's these things that can lose people in discussion when people are trying to understand what you're saying in the context of the thread topic.
What justification might be in science has no bearing on what justification is in the Christian faith. We get our theological word definitions from Scripture, since how Scripture uses the word explains the word in Scriptural contexts. For example from Berkhof's Systematic Theology:
The Hebrew term for “to justify” is hitsdik, which in the great majority of cases means “to declare judicially that one’s state is in harmony with the demands of the law, Ex. 23:7; Deut. 25:1; Prov. 17:15; Isa. 5:23. [........] The piel tsiddek occasionally has the same meaning, Jer. 3:11; Ezek. 16:50,51.
The meaning of these words is therefore strictly forensic or legal. That this is the proper denotation of the word appears (a) from the terms placed in contrast with it, as, for instance “condemnation,” Deut. 25:1; Prov. 17:15; Isa. 5:23; (b) from the correlative terms placed in juxtaposition with it and which often imply a process of judgment, Gen. 18:25; Ps. 143:2; (c) from the equivalent expressions that are sometimes used, Gen. 15:6; Ps. 32:1,2; and (d) from the fact that a passage like Prov. 17:15 would yield an impossible sense, if the word meant "to make just.” The meaning would then be: He who morally improves the life of the wicked is an abomination to the Lord.
There are a couple of passages, however, in which the word means more than simply “to declare righteous,” namely, Isa. 53:11; Dan. 12:3. But even in these cases the sense is not “to make good or holy,” but rather “to alter the condition so that man can be considered righteous.
Source
What are your thoughts about our justification, as Scripture uses the term?
You earlier said you disagreed with the thread s opening post (OP) (am I understanding that position correctly?), which was simply a book recommendation if I recall. Did you read the free ebook the author of the OP linked to?
With what did you disagree in the book?
The Doctrine of Justification: An Outline of its History in the Church; And of Its Exposition From Scripture (eBook) | Monergism
by James Buchananin ePub, .mobi & .pdf formatsAN OUTLINE OF ITS HISTORY IN THE CHURCH; AND OF ITS EXPOSITION FROM SCRIPTURETHE History of the Doctrine, as it
www.monergism.com
Last edited: