Just a place of honorIf there is no difference why is only the pope called Holy Father?
Just a place of honorIf there is no difference why is only the pope called Holy Father?
In order for me to give an accurate answer that would satisfy you, I would need you to define what you are referring to when you say "spelled out is scripture."Good my turn why do you require it to be spelled out in scripture?
Why were you unable to say that until I posted it from a Catholic website? What did you think calling the pope by a name that belongs only to God meant in Catholic doctrine before I told you? Or had you ever bothered to think about it at all? No matter what excuse is officially given so as to hopefully conceal its true intent, calling a man by a name of God, for whatever contrived reason, is blasphemy.Just a place of honor
So is prayer, alms, fasting, suffering, practice of the virtues, the mass and sacramentsFaith is the product of grace, it is a gift (Php 1;29, Ac 13:48, Ac 18:27, 2 Pe 1:1, Ro 12:3).
Have you ever read the NT?
Isa 22:21-22 fatherIn order for me to give an accurate answer that would satisfy you, I would need you to define what you are referring to when you say "spelled out is scripture."
Without knowing that all I can say is that if something isn't supported by scripture and is completely outside of it, then it is heresy. What does the Bible say? Eph 4:6 One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in all.
Matt 23:9 And call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven.
1 John 3:1 See what kind of love the Father has given us, that we should be called children of God;
Is 57:15 For thus says the high and exalted One Who lives forever, whose name is Holy.
Is 6:3 Holy, Holy, Holy, is the Lord of Hosts, the whole earth is full of His glory.
In Matt 23:9 Jesus is obviously not denying that we have earthly fathers, and cannot be saying to not acknowledge him as our father or call him father as one of the commandments is to honor our father and mother. He is speaking of God, the Father as being the only One we give the position of Father as God to. In other words don't give the title Father to men. He is our Father and we are His children.
So to call a human Holy Father, whatever justification is given for that such as officially saying it is honoring the pope's office, is calling that man by the name of God. Is 57; Is 6.
Is that what you mean by spelled out in scripture? Well, whether it is or not, it is spelled out in scripture, but you have yet to show where calling the pope Holy Father is spelled out in scripture or even remotely hinted at.
Not do not blasphemyWhy were you unable to say that until I posted it from a Catholic website? What did you think calling the pope by a name that belongs only to God meant in Catholic doctrine before I told you? Or had you ever bothered to think about it at all? No matter what excuse is officially given so as to hopefully conceal its true intent, calling a man by a name of God, for whatever contrived reason, is blasphemy.
The churches teaching authority is “spelled out” in scripture but you don’t submit?In order for me to give an accurate answer that would satisfy you, I would need you to define what you are referring to when you say "spelled out is scripture."
Without knowing that all I can say is that if something isn't supported by scripture and is completely outside of it, then it is heresy. What does the Bible say? Eph 4:6 One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in all.
Matt 23:9 And call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven.
1 John 3:1 See what kind of love the Father has given us, that we should be called children of God;
Is 57:15 For thus says the high and exalted One Who lives forever, whose name is Holy.
Is 6:3 Holy, Holy, Holy, is the Lord of Hosts, the whole earth is full of His glory.
In Matt 23:9 Jesus is obviously not denying that we have earthly fathers, and cannot be saying to not acknowledge him as our father or call him father as one of the commandments is to honor our father and mother. He is speaking of God, the Father as being the only One we give the position of Father as God to. In other words don't give the title Father to men. He is our Father and we are His children.
So to call a human Holy Father, whatever justification is given for that such as officially saying it is honoring the pope's office, is calling that man by the name of God. Is 57; Is 6.
Is that what you mean by spelled out in scripture? Well, whether it is or not, it is spelled out in scripture, but you have yet to show where calling the pope Holy Father is spelled out in scripture or even remotely hinted at.
Alms is a gift?So is prayer, alms, fasting, suffering, practice of the virtues, the mass and sacraments
Thanks
I submit completely to the scriptures. What I don't submit to is the Catholic church declaring itself as the authority over scripture and its interpretation. And all you give me to go on is that. You never verify from the Bible o anywhere but with itself as its own witness that the Catholic denomination is declared by scripture to be the true church of Christ. When you are able to do that, I will submit. Until then we will only be able to go in circles. So far it is purely and only a true example of the doctrines and traditions of men. Though that is often used to decry anything one does not believe, in this case it is as true and obvious as was the Pharisees and Sadducees when Jesus declared it of them. Also calling them whitewashed tombs full of dead men's bones who were not entering the kingdom themselves and kept others out as well. An independent thinking person would take heed of such words.The churches teaching authority is “spelled out” in scripture but you don’t submit?
What does "not do not blasphemy" mean?Not do not blasphemy
Name and named are not the same thing. Can you tell me what that passage means if it is put back into its context and without having to check a Catholic source to tell you what it means?Ephesians 3:15
Of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named,
Not when it is used as Holy Father. When it is uses in the sense above it means set apart by God as a holy vessel---rather than one meant for destruction.Saint means holy called to be holy
Is there a reason why it must be one or the other? The Bible is the only authority of truthful doctrine in His church. That simply states an organization does not have a higher authority over it or over people. What is to be taught in His church are the very same truths that are found in the Bible given by Jesus and the apostles. Though various interpretations of any given scripture may arise with this freedom, it is the freedom God gives us, only one is accurate and with the use of apologetics----and sometimes simple second grade level reading---will determine what that is. No organization has authority of interpretation. Any that claims to is suspect, red flags waving, right from the start. And not to worry about what you may think is faulty, God elects some to salvation through faith in the true Christ, and the true work that He did, and the true sufficiency of that work, and they will hear and come. And He will lead them to truth. Not the Catholic denomination or church, or any other visible church.The “Bible is the only authority”!
Or
“Christ founded a church to teach and sanctify all men unto
Eternal salvation”: Matt 28:28 Lk 1:4 acts 1:8, 2:42, 8:31 Jn 16:13, 20:21-23 Matt 18:17 1 Tim 3:16
1 Jn 1:4
The Bible is the fruit of apostolic teaching, whether my mouth or letter. What she was taught is in the scriptures. The Catholic denomination steps outside the boundaries of the four corners of the Bible. And a boundary it is. Greater understanding can be gained within a congregation but that is done by expounding on the word in the Bible. Not by going outside of it. The teachers and preachers are to expound on the word of God as it is given. When was the last time or first time such a thing happened in a Catholic service?The Bible is the fruit of the apostolic tradition, the church is not dependent on scripture to know truth cos she was taught by Christ in person for thee years!
Supernatural gift or virtue of generosity yes!Alms is a gift?
There are no denominations in scripture just one true church! Jn 10:16 Lk 22:29I submit completely to the scriptures. What I don't submit to is the Catholic church declaring itself as the authority over scripture and its interpretation. And all you give me to go on is that. You never verify from the Bible o anywhere but with itself as its own witness that the Catholic denomination is declared by scripture to be the true church of Christ. When you are able to do that, I will submit. Until then we will only be able to go in circles. So far it is purely and only a true example of the doctrines and traditions of men. Though that is often used to decry anything one does not believe, in this case it is as true and obvious as was the Pharisees and Sadducees when Jesus declared it of them. Also calling them whitewashed tombs full of dead men's bones who were not entering the kingdom themselves and kept others out as well. An independent thinking person would take heed of such words.
As to the rest of your post that evidently considers a plethora of quoted scriptures that contain only the supposed authority to interpret scripture above and beyond any peons ability to do so, or even God to guide them into all truth (as per scripture), when you begin to address the scriptures I have given with the interpretation the Bible presents, and my using the Bible to show how scripture interprets scripture, and have the courteousey to do the same, I have nothing more to say to you.
You have lost this debate, just as Catholic's loose all debates for the same reason. You start from a premise that is never proven and continue from a premise that is never proven. But you go right ahead and put your trust in such a foolish place to put one's trust.
Sorry is not blasphemyWhat does "not do not blasphemy" mean?
Name and named are not the same thing. Can you tell me what that passage means if it is put back into its context and without having to check a Catholic source to tell you what it means?
Scripture and traditionNot when it is used as Holy Father. When it is uses in the sense above it means set apart by God as a holy vessel---rather than one meant for destruction.
Is there a reason why it must be one or the other? The Bible is the only authority of truthful doctrine in His church. That simply states an organization does not have a higher authority over it or over people. What is to be taught in His church are the very same truths that are found in the Bible given by Jesus and the apostles. Though various interpretations of any given scripture may arise with this freedom, it is the freedom God gives us, only one is accurate and with the use of apologetics----and sometimes simple second grade level reading---will determine what that is. No organization has authority of interpretation. Any that claims to is suspect, red flags waving, right from the start. And not to worry about what you may think is faulty, God elects some to salvation through faith in the true Christ, and the true work that He did, and the true sufficiency of that work, and they will hear and come. And He will lead them to truth. Not the Catholic denomination or church, or any other visible church.
The Bible is the fruit of apostolic teaching, whether my mouth or letter. What she was taught is in the scriptures. The Catholic denomination steps outside the boundaries of the four corners of the Bible. And a boundary it is. Greater understanding can be gained within a congregation but that is done by expounding on the word in the Bible. Not by going outside of it. The teachers and preachers are to expound on the word of God as it is given. When was the last time or first time such a thing happened in a Catholic service?
The RCC is a denomination. It isn't in scripture.There are no denominations in scripture just one true church! Jn 10:16 Lk 22:29
The priesthood was part of the old covenant. There is no more priesthood. There is one Priest the Lord Jesus Christ. Read Hebrews with a neutral eye. Low priest is an invention of catholicism.There must be low priests in the same order for a high priest to be over them. And the word in scripture “priesthood” is plural.
And this has what to do with salvation and justification by faith alone, not by works?Supernatural gift or virtue of generosity yes!
Arial.So you did not think I was simply arguing with you rather than defending and contending for the faith that saves.
I do know those scriptures, No need for insult to make your point. But you do not give them according to the Bible but according the the way in which the RCC with its self proclaimed authority on interpretation, interprets them. And they only basis for which they have on which to interpret them the way they do comes from themselves, not the scriptures. It calls itself the One universal only official church of Christ. But God did not appoint them to that position, Christ did not appoint them to that position the Bible did not. Who did? Themselves.
So try giving an interpretation to those scriptures in their entirety and within their context, using intellect, reason. logic, rules of interpretation, exegesis, other parts of the Bible, without Catholic dogma thrown in the mix as confirmation bias therefore ruling the day, and tell me what they are saying and what they mean. Can you do that?
No I do not. Most of all I need to read the Bible and I do, and most of all you have the same need.
Neither of which are in the Bible unless they are read into it with little to know understanding outside RCC indoctrination. You have given no proof of either of those things. You simply repeat the Catholic mantras. It is as though one cannot think for themselves and certainly should not be allowed to.
It has nothing to do with the power of Jesus, this going off the rails. I happen to believe that the rise of the RCC and its hierarchy and dictatorship over the religious life of everyone was the first and worst and most tenacious of all the going off the rails. Paul would be kicking the Catholic priests and bishops and pope out the door. Jesus Himself said the tares would grow alongside the wheat. He was the first to say there would be false teachers and false prophets and wolves in sheeps clothing seeking to devour the flock, disguising themselves as angels of light. There were those in the days of the apostles as we see form many of the letters, that were distorting the truth and exalting themselves. It is all part of the war.
Even many of the protestant churches have areas where they have gone off the rails. Personally I think it may be a winnowing, separating the true believer from those who borrow the name.
Any disputes I may have with another I resolve with the scriptures. If the scriptures did not already have a meaning it would be useless and pointless and it would not be the word of God. Or does the Catholic tradition not consider it the word of God but the Catholic church as the word of God? Disputes within churches are handled in various ways and I am not concerned with that except in the church I attend, and then if it does not consider the word of God, I reject it.
Why is it that you think there should be no opposing beliefs, that all matters on religion and tradition must be settled by a central hierarchy in Rome and all must comply? That all people must think the same, believe the same, act the same, and if there is not this conformity then Christ's church fails? Why do you think it is the job of your denomination (and that is all it is, another denomination) to set these things, and order these things, as though Christ were impotent to seal and protect His church and His people?
Who cares who agrees with who on what in the past, or now. Agreement is not the issue. Salvation and the glory of God is the issue.
And scripture meaning handed by tradition? No. Scripture is God speaking, anointed men, appointed by God and instructed and inspired by the very Holy Spirit to give us what we need. To give us truth. Jesus spoke against trusting in and believing in the traditions of men. And that is all the RCC counts on and produces.
Since I addressed all that you said in this post, in spite of the fact that it just restated your position and did not address a single thing I said, suppose you go back to that post and address the things I said.