• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

How old is the earth?

But the existing genetic material in the Japanese dwarf wheat, Shiro Daruma, how did it come to be? How did the dwarfing allele Rht-B1b originate?
"Point mutations have been induced in dwarf wheat. These mutations, often induced by mutagens like ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) or gamma-ray irradiation, can alter genes involved in gibberellin (GA) biosynthesis or signaling pathways, leading to reduced plant height. Specifically, mutations in genes like Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b, which are DELLA genes, have been linked to dwarfism in wheat."

Plant breeders have been using chemicals for a very long time. Early 20th century.
The breeders are not compelled and do not generally tell about their practices.

I forgot to mention one other GMO technique in my list in previous post.
Transgene insertion
GMO Cannola is Transgenetic Inserted Mutation.

Now answer my question
 
Last edited:
The age is suggested by what they are offering as things from pre-Gen 1.

If those things did happen in a writing that got left out or tossed out of the OT... that was certainly not just by 20 or 50 year extension to time...

So, I would say it is within consideration for here.

The rest can be taken under advisement, but I have read enough in the book of Enoch to agree with the suggestions there.

For other reasons than the Enoch source, I conclude that the earth was part of 'the spreading out' and was there earlier than creation week. Do you find that Enoch is concerned with sequencing itself with events like that, or only with after the human revolt and with interactions with humans--the misguiding of the Watchers, for ex.
 
Now, answer my question

Only after you first answer mine: "What is the source of your claim that the Rht-B1b point mutation was induced?"

You provided a quote, but I asked for a source—if for no other reason than being able to verify the quote, its larger context, and who said it.
 
Only after you first answer mine: "What is the source of your claim that the Rht-B1b point mutation was induced?"
Any information about GMO is difficult to find. These are trade secrets of the plant breeder.
I spent months teasing out information about Colchosine when I was thinking about hybridizing Irises.
That source is an internet search. Take it or leave it.
I have seen that information on other sources but I don't have the time to search the entire net and all my archives.

Also:
"dwarf wheat varieties, especially those bred for semi-dwarfism (like those used in the Green Revolution), typically require controlled breeding to maintain their desirable traits when grown from seed. This is because the semi-dwarfing genes, while beneficial for yield and lodging resistance, can be affected by natural segregation and recombination during sexual reproduction. "

Dwarf Wheat Requires Controlled Breeding.That means #2) Not viable outside cultivation, (natural segregation (deselected) and recombination.)


So, if you really need an answer acceptable to you to that question, do your own research.
In the meantime..Don't answer my question.
I have answered you. If you refuse to accept the answer, so be it.
 
Last edited:
But the existing genetic material in the Japanese dwarf wheat, Shiro Daruma, how did it come to be? How did the dwarfing allele Rht-B1b originate?

Answer: A point mutation.
The mutation was regressive.
 
Only after you first answer mine: "What is the source of your claim that the Rht-B1b point mutation was induced?"

1) "Japan allows the use of irradiated dwarf wheat, specifically a variety known as Norin 10 wheat,"
2) "Irradiation of dwarf wheat in Japan is primarily associated with the development of the semi-dwarf wheat variety Norin 10"

Norin 10 is Irradiated Wheat, Norin 10 was the mutation used in the Green Revolution.

Hmmm...that's interesting
but I am getting seriously weary of researching this.
Take it or leave it...
 
Last edited:
For other reasons than the Enoch source, I conclude that the earth was part of 'the spreading out' and was there earlier than creation week.

I am certain it was there before creation. While I am opposed to the idea of evolution, there is no reason to believe earth has not been around
as long as the other space spectaculars, give or take how the expansion really happened. I have always felt that earth was chosen by God for His purposes in creation, of which we likely will never truly know about. I have my suspicions but an not willing to be thrown into the proverbial lions den by voicing them to some who... ummmm.... how to say this nicely..... avi_headscratch.gif...well I cant so I wont.
Do you find that Enoch is concerned with sequencing itself with events like that, or only with after the human revolt and with interactions with humans--the misguiding of the Watchers, for ex.
Honestly I have found the book of Enoch to be disjointed depending on which version of a translation I was reading at the time.
Seems like older translations would jump all over the place....
However, truth is I have managed to lose translations in the laptop, which will never see day again, but the following are a few translations that are seemingly the same... except the last two are specifically on 1 Enoch 93 Enoch's vision of the future, and 1 Enoch: The Son of Man

I have a few links that have not disappeared into the laptop... to never be seen again... and they are below.

I did not take the time to check all 105 chapters but the general layout on the first 4 is about the same.. and they are not so much regarding the things in the video but the sequencing of things from creation.... and also his experience with the angels and about the watchers etc.


I could kick myself because I did have at least 4 maybe more links though that were totally disjointed in comparison to these and when I
just went to find them to post here..... GONE. When or where I have no idea, other then about 3 years ago my laptop died and I got this one. I had them transfer the stuff from the old hard drive over here, but they said some was missing so ?/ The only ones left are below. The disjointed ones are the ones that had some suggestions of things before creation. As I say, they were disjointed and I had more arguements with those
who discounted what I would post from them

Now, I will spend some time to see if I can find those again...... and if I do I will post them.

But check these out if interested, and if not.. at least see numbers 5 and 6.

This first link, itself, lays out the chapters in a precise way, and from them you would naturally conclude a sequencing of events.

https://book-ofenoch.com/chapter-i/
IN
Link 1 (There is a very long introduction, but interesting)

https://readingacts.com/2016/07/07/enoch-and-the-mysteries-of-god-2-enoch-23-37/
He touches on creation... But here is the first clue that this could be a fantasy. For have we not all been told by Jesus that no man has ascended to Heaven and seen God, except for Himself that came from there? Unless , as you will see below... the Lord is Jesus/Word and not the Father?
Link 2
https://readingacts.com/2016/07/07/enoch-and-the-mysteries-of-god-2-enoch-23-37/In any event... the following is all that is in this link. Any bolding or color changes are mine for emphasis.
Read below, especially what is said in chapter 32 below .... and 5 1/2 hours?

Enoch and the Mysteries of God – 2 Enoch 23-37

After he becomes like the angels, Enoch is instructed by Vrevoil, the swiftest of the archangels who records all the Lord’s deeds. After being instructed for 30 days and 30 nights, Enoch records this instruction in 366 books (22:10-23:6; Recension A has 360 books). After writing the books, Enoch is invited to sit next to the Lord with Gabriel.

God proceeds to explain “mysteries” of creation and the fall to Enoch:

  • Chapter 24 – God created visible from invisible.
  • Chapter 26 – An invisible thing (Adiol) descends and God commands it to disintegrate. A great light comes from this creature; the great light becomes the “great age” of creation. God established his throne in this creation.
  • Chapter 27-28 – God creates water and land from the light and darkness. Seven circles are established for seven stars. This is the first day of the creation week.
  • Chapter 29 – On Monday (the second day) God fashions rock from the fiery substance of heaven. On this day Satanail falls, he was hurled out of heaven and is now flying around in the air above the bottomless pit.
  • Chapter 30 – On Tuesday (the third day) God commands the earth to create trees and grasses; God laid out paradise as a garden. Enoch On Wednesday (the fourth day) God establishes the stars, sun and moon in the various circles of the heavens. On Thursday he commands the seas to bring forth fish and birds. On Friday God creates Man out of seven components with seven properties. Man was assigned to the earth as a second angel, to reign as a king. He was named Adam and given free will to either love God or hate him (30:15).
  • Chapter 31 – Adam is given a single task but the devil entered paradise and corrupted Eve. This devil did not speak to Adam, therefore it is on account of Eve the Lord curses mankind. This is obviously at odds with Romans 5:12-21 where Adam is blamed for death and sin, Eve is not mentioned.
  • Chapter 32 – Adam is removed from the garden after his transgression (after only five and a half hours!)
  • Chapter 33 – Enoch is told there will be 7000 years of human existence, with an eighth thousand with not days, months, or years (probably an eternal state.) Presumably there will be one thousand for each of the days of creation. The idea of seven creational days = 7000 years of human history crosses over into Christianity via the Epistle of Barnabas but is not found in the Bible.
  • Chapter 34 – The judgment of the flood on the sinner who accepted a different yoke than the Lord’s yoke. The sins listed here are fornication and sodomy.
  • Chapter 35 – God promises to allow one righteous man from Enoch’s line to survive the flood for the purpose of passing along the words of Enoch.
  • Chapter 36 – Enoch is commanded to live for thirty days on the earth for the purpose of passing on the wisdom he has learned during his heavenly journeys.
  • Chapter 36 – Enoch is returned to earth by one of the senior angels.

Link 3
is another version of the book to read. You can check it out as I honestly did not read it all assuming it is like the first link.

https://reluctant-messenger.com/1enoch01-60.htm
Link 4 - is another presentation, that from my checking through out I believe to be the same.

https://www.biblical.ie/page.php?fl=Apocrypha/Book_of_Enoch
(105 chapters; also referred to as "Ethiopian Enoch" or "The Apocalypse of Enoch") Translation: Robert Henry Charles, Oxford, Clarendon, 1897
Link 5....https://cojs.org/1_enoch_93-_enoch-s_vision_of_the_future/
ENOCH'S VISION OF THE FUTURE.
Link 6
https://www.livius.org/sources/content/1-enoch-the-son-of-man/Copied in full below , for those who do not like to go to links.

1 Enoch: the Son of Man​

The First book of Enoch is one of the Old Testament pseudepigrapha, in other words, a composition attributed to a personage from the Hebrew Bible, but not included in either the Jewish or the Christian Bible. It contains a description of the Son of Man as pre-existent.


[46.1-4] And there I saw the One to Whom belongs the time before time, and His head was white like wool. With Him was another being, whose countenance had the appearance of a man, and his face was full of graciousness, like one of the holy angels. I asked the angel who went with me [...] concerning that son of and who he was, and whence he was, and why he went with the One to Whom belongs the time before time.

He answered and said to me: 'This is the son of man who has righteousness, with whom dwells righteousness, and who reveals all the treasures of that which is hidden, because the Lord of the spirits has chosen him, and whose lot has the pre-eminence before the Lord of the spirits in uprightness for ever. This son of man whom you have seen shall raise up the kings and the mighty from their seats and the strong from their thrones, and shall loosen the reins of the strong and break the teeth of the sinners.'

[48.2-10] And at that hour that Son of Man was named in the presence of the Lord of the spirits, and his name before the the One to Whom belongs the time before time. Yes, before the sun and the signs were created, before the stars of the heaven were made, his name was named before the Lord of the spirits. He shall be a staff to the righteous whereon to stay themselves and not fall, and he shall be the light of the gentiles and the hope of those who are troubled of heart. All who dwell on earth shall fall down and worship before him, and will praise and bless and celebrate with song the Lord of the spirits. For this reason has he been chosen and hidden before Him, before the creation of the world and for ever more. The wisdom of the Lord of the spirits has revealed him to the holy and righteous; for he has preserved the lot of the righteous, because they have hated and despised this world of unrighteousness, and have hated all its works and ways in the name of the Lord of the spirits: for in his name they are saved, and according to his good pleasure has it been in regard to their life.

In these days downcast in countenance shall the kings of the earth have become, and the strong who possess the land because of the works of their hands, for on the day of their anguish and affliction they shall not be able to save themselves. And I will give them over into the hands of My elect: as straw in the fire so shall they burn before the face of the holy, as lead in the water shall they sink before the face of the righteous, and no trace of them shall any more be found.

And on the day of their affliction there shall be rest on the earth, and before them they shall fall and not rise again. There shall be no one to take them with his hands and raise them, for they have denied the Lord of the spirits and His Messiah. The name of the Lord of the spirits be blessed.

This page was created in 2002; last modified on 12 October 2020.
 
I am certain it was there before creation. While I am opposed to the idea of evolution, there is no reason to believe earth has not been around
as long as the other space spectaculars, give or take how the expansion really happened. I have always felt that earth was chosen by God for His purposes in creation, of which we likely will never truly know about. I have my suspicions but an not willing to be thrown into the proverbial lions den by voicing them to some who... ummmm.... how to say this nicely..... View attachment 1175...well I cant so I wont.

Honestly I have found the book of Enoch to be disjointed depending on which version of a translation I was reading at the time.
Seems like older translations would jump all over the place....
However, truth is I have managed to lose translations in the laptop, which will never see day again, but the following are a few translations that are seemingly the same... except the last two are specifically on 1 Enoch 93 Enoch's vision of the future, and 1 Enoch: The Son of Man

I have a few links that have not disappeared into the laptop... to never be seen again... and they are below.

I did not take the time to check all 105 chapters but the general layout on the first 4 is about the same.. and they are not so much regarding the things in the video but the sequencing of things from creation.... and also his experience with the angels and about the watchers etc.


I could kick myself because I did have at least 4 maybe more links though that were totally disjointed in comparison to these and when I
just went to find them to post here..... GONE. When or where I have no idea, other then about 3 years ago my laptop died and I got this one. I had them transfer the stuff from the old hard drive over here, but they said some was missing so ?/ The only ones left are below. The disjointed ones are the ones that had some suggestions of things before creation. As I say, they were disjointed and I had more arguements with those
who discounted what I would post from them

Now, I will spend some time to see if I can find those again...... and if I do I will post them.

But check these out if interested, and if not.. at least see numbers 5 and 6.

This first link, itself, lays out the chapters in a precise way, and from them you would naturally conclude a sequencing of events.

https://book-ofenoch.com/chapter-i/
IN
Link 1 (There is a very long introduction, but interesting)

https://readingacts.com/2016/07/07/enoch-and-the-mysteries-of-god-2-enoch-23-37/
He touches on creation... But here is the first clue that this could be a fantasy. For have we not all been told by Jesus that no man has ascended to Heaven and seen God, except for Himself that came from there? Unless , as you will see below... the Lord is Jesus/Word and not the Father?
Link 2
https://readingacts.com/2016/07/07/enoch-and-the-mysteries-of-god-2-enoch-23-37/In any event... the following is all that is in this link. Any bolding or color changes are mine for emphasis.
Read below, especially what is said in chapter 32 below .... and 5 1/2 hours?

Enoch and the Mysteries of God – 2 Enoch 23-37

After he becomes like the angels, Enoch is instructed by Vrevoil, the swiftest of the archangels who records all the Lord’s deeds. After being instructed for 30 days and 30 nights, Enoch records this instruction in 366 books (22:10-23:6; Recension A has 360 books). After writing the books, Enoch is invited to sit next to the Lord with Gabriel.

God proceeds to explain “mysteries” of creation and the fall to Enoch:

  • Chapter 24 – God created visible from invisible.
  • Chapter 26 – An invisible thing (Adiol) descends and God commands it to disintegrate. A great light comes from this creature; the great light becomes the “great age” of creation. God established his throne in this creation.
  • Chapter 27-28 – God creates water and land from the light and darkness. Seven circles are established for seven stars. This is the first day of the creation week.
  • Chapter 29 – On Monday (the second day) God fashions rock from the fiery substance of heaven. On this day Satanail falls, he was hurled out of heaven and is now flying around in the air above the bottomless pit.
  • Chapter 30 – On Tuesday (the third day) God commands the earth to create trees and grasses; God laid out paradise as a garden. Enoch On Wednesday (the fourth day) God establishes the stars, sun and moon in the various circles of the heavens. On Thursday he commands the seas to bring forth fish and birds. On Friday God creates Man out of seven components with seven properties. Man was assigned to the earth as a second angel, to reign as a king. He was named Adam and given free will to either love God or hate him (30:15).
  • Chapter 31 – Adam is given a single task but the devil entered paradise and corrupted Eve. This devil did not speak to Adam, therefore it is on account of Eve the Lord curses mankind. This is obviously at odds with Romans 5:12-21 where Adam is blamed for death and sin, Eve is not mentioned.
  • Chapter 32 – Adam is removed from the garden after his transgression (after only five and a half hours!)
  • Chapter 33 – Enoch is told there will be 7000 years of human existence, with an eighth thousand with not days, months, or years (probably an eternal state.) Presumably there will be one thousand for each of the days of creation. The idea of seven creational days = 7000 years of human history crosses over into Christianity via the Epistle of Barnabas but is not found in the Bible.
  • Chapter 34 – The judgment of the flood on the sinner who accepted a different yoke than the Lord’s yoke. The sins listed here are fornication and sodomy.
  • Chapter 35 – God promises to allow one righteous man from Enoch’s line to survive the flood for the purpose of passing along the words of Enoch.
  • Chapter 36 – Enoch is commanded to live for thirty days on the earth for the purpose of passing on the wisdom he has learned during his heavenly journeys.
  • Chapter 36 – Enoch is returned to earth by one of the senior angels.

Link 3 is another version of the book to read. You can check it out as I honestly did not read it all assuming it is like the first link.

https://reluctant-messenger.com/1enoch01-60.htm
Link 4 - is another presentation, that from my checking through out I believe to be the same.

https://www.biblical.ie/page.php?fl=Apocrypha/Book_of_Enoch
(105 chapters; also referred to as "Ethiopian Enoch" or "The Apocalypse of Enoch") Translation: Robert Henry Charles, Oxford, Clarendon, 1897
Link 5....https://cojs.org/1_enoch_93-_enoch-s_vision_of_the_future/
ENOCH'S VISION OF THE FUTURE.
Link 6
https://www.livius.org/sources/content/1-enoch-the-son-of-man/Copied in full below , for those who do not like to go to links.

1 Enoch: the Son of Man​

The First book of Enoch is one of the Old Testament pseudepigrapha, in other words, a composition attributed to a personage from the Hebrew Bible, but not included in either the Jewish or the Christian Bible. It contains a description of the Son of Man as pre-existent.


[46.1-4] And there I saw the One to Whom belongs the time before time, and His head was white like wool. With Him was another being, whose countenance had the appearance of a man, and his face was full of graciousness, like one of the holy angels. I asked the angel who went with me [...] concerning that son of and who he was, and whence he was, and why he went with the One to Whom belongs the time before time.

He answered and said to me: 'This is the son of man who has righteousness, with whom dwells righteousness, and who reveals all the treasures of that which is hidden, because the Lord of the spirits has chosen him, and whose lot has the pre-eminence before the Lord of the spirits in uprightness for ever. This son of man whom you have seen shall raise up the kings and the mighty from their seats and the strong from their thrones, and shall loosen the reins of the strong and break the teeth of the sinners.'

[48.2-10] And at that hour that Son of Man was named in the presence of the Lord of the spirits, and his name before the the One to Whom belongs the time before time. Yes, before the sun and the signs were created, before the stars of the heaven were made, his name was named before the Lord of the spirits. He shall be a staff to the righteous whereon to stay themselves and not fall, and he shall be the light of the gentiles and the hope of those who are troubled of heart. All who dwell on earth shall fall down and worship before him, and will praise and bless and celebrate with song the Lord of the spirits. For this reason has he been chosen and hidden before Him, before the creation of the world and for ever more. The wisdom of the Lord of the spirits has revealed him to the holy and righteous; for he has preserved the lot of the righteous, because they have hated and despised this world of unrighteousness, and have hated all its works and ways in the name of the Lord of the spirits: for in his name they are saved, and according to his good pleasure has it been in regard to their life.

In these days downcast in countenance shall the kings of the earth have become, and the strong who possess the land because of the works of their hands, for on the day of their anguish and affliction they shall not be able to save themselves. And I will give them over into the hands of My elect: as straw in the fire so shall they burn before the face of the holy, as lead in the water shall they sink before the face of the righteous, and no trace of them shall any more be found.

And on the day of their affliction there shall be rest on the earth, and before them they shall fall and not rise again. There shall be no one to take them with his hands and raise them, for they have denied the Lord of the spirits and His Messiah. The name of the Lord of the spirits be blessed.

This page was created in 2002; last modified on 12 October 2020.

Wow that will take more time than I have. I think you are on the right track about the pre-existence. Have you seen my 1 min video? DM for details.
 
Any information about GMO is difficult to find. These are trade secrets of the plant breeder. ... I don't have the time to search the entire net and all my archives.

First, I am not asking you to find anything. I am asking you to cite the source of the quote you used. When you quote something, tell us where it came from.

For example, let's say I quoted the following material:
  • "By 1962, 10 years after Vogel first supplied seed of the Norin 10 semi-dwarf progeny to Borlaug, two high-yielding semi-dwarf Norin 10 derivatives, Pitic 62 and Penjamo 62, were released for commercial production."
Who said that? When? And where? And what was the immediate and surrounding context? These questions cannot be answered unless I cite the source of that quote:
  • Miriam Shindler, "From East Asia to South Asia, via Mexico: How One Gene Changed the Course of History," International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), January 3, 2016, www.cimmyt.org
When you provide a quote—like you did and continue to do—show me and the readers where you pulled it from, using a link at the very least.

Note: You said, "That source is an internet search. Take it or leave it." This leads me to suspect that the quoted material is coming from an AI-generated snapshot of the answer to your search query that gets included at the top of your results. If that is the case, then I must tell you that I cannot trust it—and neither should you—because AI models have a habit of going out of their way to please the user, even if it requires making stuff up (called "hallucinating" in the industry).

Second, your quoted material was wrong. Let's remind the readers of what the quote said:

Point mutations have been induced in dwarf wheat. These mutations, often induced by mutagens like ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) or gamma-ray irradiation, can alter genes involved in gibberellin (GA) biosynthesis or signaling pathways, leading to reduced plant height. Specifically, mutations in genes like Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b, which are DELLA genes, have been linked to dwarfism in wheat.

Since this was likely an AI-generated summary of the answer to whatever question you asked, it's practically impossible to evaluate because it doesn't occupy a larger context. It sounds to me like it's saying this dwarfing allele was the product of a chemical or physical mutagen, either ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) or gamma-ray irradiation.

However, both of these were not in use until three decades or more after the Japanese had already created the Norin series of dwarf wheat. Gamma-ray irradiation began to be used as a mutagenic mechanism from the 1940s onward (thanks to cobalt-60), and EMS started to become widely used beginning in the 1960s. Pay attention to those dates and ask yourself, "How long has dwarf wheat been around?"

It was near the turn of the 20th century that Japanese breeders began to focus on systematic wheat improvement. They identified short landraces like Shiro-Daruma as promising for reducing lodging, a variety whose origin may reach to Korea (Kihara 1983, 16-18; Evans 1998, 138). By 1910, white and red strains are listed (Shiro-Daruma and Aka-Daruma, respectively).

Now, remember when I mentioned the Japanese crossing Daruma with Fultz in the early 1900s? It was the first documented step toward Norin 10; his name was Gonjiro Inazuka and it was 1917. So, roughly three decades before those mutagenesis protocols were being used, this dwarfing allele was already being exploited by breeders. And then Fultz-Daruma was being crossed with Turkey Red around 1925 to create Norin 10, which was registered in October of 1935.

And, it bears repeating (so as not to be missed), this was traditional Mendelian breeding, not mutagenesis protocols. Notice that all of this was before 1940, after all. And I haven't even included the fact that there are records of this dwarf wheat going back further, such as 1873 (Dalrymple 1978, 11):

In 1873, Horace Capron, former U.S. Commissioner of Agriculture who headed an agricultural advisory group to Japan, wrote that "the Japanese farmers have brought the art of dwarfing to perfection." He noted that "the wheat stalk seldom grows higher than 2 feet, and often not more than 20 inches." The head was short but heavy. The Japanese claimed that the straw had been so shortened" that no matter how much manure is used it will not grow longer, but rather the length of the wheat-head is increased." Capron noted that "on the richest soils and with the heaviest yields, the wheat stalks never fall down and lodge." (Horace Capron. "Agriculture in Japan." Report of the Commissioner of Agriculture for the Year 1873, Washington. 1874. p. 369.)

I'm sorry, ma'am, it was a naturally-occurring mutation—and it is heritable, viable, and persists across generations.

I have made a clear and solid argument with ample sources. I am content to allow the readers to judge between us for themselves.


"Dwarf wheat varieties, especially those bred for semi-dwarfism (like those used in the Green Revolution), typically require controlled breeding to maintain their desirable traits when grown from seed. This is because the semi-dwarfing genes, while beneficial for yield and lodging resistance, can be affected by natural segregation and recombination during sexual reproduction."

It is true that plants will produce genetic variation if they're allowed to cross-pollinate freely with other varieties. If a farmer doesn't control pollination, genes can be diluted or replaced by crossing with tall wheat or other cultivars. This is true for all pure lines, not just dwarf wheat.

However, that doesn't mean the dwarfing genes are unstable inside the line. (They aren't.) It just means you have to prevent contamination from outside pollen.

The dwarfing alleles in Norin 10 and its derivatives are point mutations in a DELLA protein that reduces gibberellin sensitivity. Once a variety carrying them is homozygous and self-pollinating, it is a pure-line cultivar—genetically stable across generations if grown in isolation from other varieties.

Unlike F1 hybrids (e.g., canola), you can save seed from dwarf wheat and get the same plant next year. No segregation problem occurs within the pure line because there is no hidden heterozygosity.


So, if you really need an answer acceptable to you to that question, do your own research.

What I need is a source. You keep handing me one quote after another, but never a source for any of them—the only thing I had asked for.

Look over this response to you that I have written here. I have provided all the sources of the material I am using and quoting.

That is what I am asking of you. When you quote something, show where it came from.


I have answered you. If you refuse to accept the answer, so be it.

I can't refuse to accept something you haven't provided.



References:

Dana G. Dalrymple, Development and Spread of High-Yielding Varieties of Wheat and Rice in the Less Developed Nations, 6th ed., Foreign Agricultural Economic Report no. 95 (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of International Cooperation and Development, in cooperation with U.S. Agency for International Development, 1978). (PDF link)

L. T. Evans, Feeding the Ten Billion: Plants and Population Growth (Cambridge University Press, 1998).

Gonjiro Inazuka, “Norin 10, a Japanese Semi-Dwarf Wheat Variety,” Wheat Information Service, no. 32 (March 1971): 25–30, Biological Laboratory, Kyoto University.

Hitoshi Kihara, "Origin and History of ‘Daruma,’ a Parental Variety of Norin 10," in Proceedings of the Sixth International Wheat Genetics Symposium (Kyoto, Nov. 28–Dec. 3, 1983), ed. Sadao Sakamoto (Kyoto: Plant Germ-Plasm Institute, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyoto University, 1983), 13–19 (DOC link).

Takeo Matsumoto, "Norin 10: A Dwarf Winter Wheat Variety," Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly 3, no. 4 (1968): 22–26 (PDF link).

M. J. Pinthus and A. A. Levy, "The Relationship Between the Rht1 and Rht2 Dwarfing Genes and Grain Weight in Triticum aestivum L. Spring Wheat," Theoretical and Applied Genetics 66 (1983): 153–57, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00265191.

Miriam Shindler, "From East Asia to South Asia, via Mexico: How One Gene Changed the Course of History," International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), January 3, 2016 (link).
 
"That source is an internet search.
The Irriadiation of Niron 10 was done in 1930's. Those sources are not on the internet. All of your information is 1971 or later. Irradiation and chemical GMO were new and exciting in 1930 but there ware very few mentions of it in later sources.
If you want to actually research, if you had any serious interest in the subject, examine the research information in the 1930s or research any current source that had reason to mention the facts.
This should aid you in researching the subject further.

Mendelian Genetics
Recombination of Existing Genes. (no mutation)
1) All those genes (traits) selected are in the plant/species..
All Genes are present in the organism.
None Added, None Subtracted No Mutation No Evoluton.

So Lose Lose.
If it is Medelian Genetics
The Dwarf Wheat is still wheat. Short people are still people.
No Evolution

If it is a GMO
No Evolution
 
Last edited:
The irradiation of Norin 10 was done in 1930s.

A claim made without a shred of evidence. (AI-generated content is not evidence.)

We know that strains descended from Norin 10 (e.g., Lerma Rojo 64) were subjected to irradiation in the 1960s (Matsumoto 1968, 25-26), but that is decades after the fact.

After the World War II, seeds of Norin 10 were brought to U.S.A. and winter wheat varieties, Gaines and Nugaines, were bred successively there using it as a parent. Then, spring varieties Lerma Rojo 64, Sonora 64, Nainari 60, and Pitic 62 and Mayo 64 were obtained in the same way in Mexico. Those improved varieties and other strains descended from Norin 10, as S. 227, S. 307, S. 308 and S. 331 were introduced to India as materials for breeding, and many dwarf wheat varieties, Kalyan Sona, Sonalika, Safed Lerma, Chhoti Lerma, and Sharbati Sonora were obtained there through the breeding by separation, breeding by hybridization and mutation breeding by isolation from gamma-ray treated seeds, rendering great services for the improvement of the food situation in this country. (ibid.; emphases mine)


All of your information is 1971 or later.

Irrelevant. But also false: One of my sources was from 1874.

And let's not ignore the fact that one of my sources, Inazuka, was the guy who created Norin 10. He probably knew something about it.


Irradiation and chemical GMO were new and exciting in 1930 but there were very few mentions of it in later sources.

Irrelevant. Shiro-Daruma and Norin 10 already existed by the 1930s.


If you want to actually research, if you had any serious interest in the subject, ...

That is a very snide and insulting remark, considering the number of hours I have invested in this conversation, researching the history and development of the Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b dwarfing genes and sharing that information with linked articles, including from people involved in that history.

And this insult came from someone who went no deeper than error-prone AI-generated summaries and personal anecdotes.


... examine the research information in the 1930s ...

Shiro-Daruma and Norin 10 already existed by the 1930s.


Mendelian Genetics
Recombination of existing genes.

Correct—existing genes that included the point mutations Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b.
 
Correct—existing genes that included the point mutations Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b.
So what exactly is the point?
Rht B1b is found in Triticum dicoccoides which is a tetraploid ancestor the hexaploidal domestic wheat.
If that is so, then the RhT B1b are recessives that were expressed through the controlled breeding program in Japan and later in Mexico. using Mexican Dwarf Wheat.

The fact remains, if that is true, then the genes are recombination, no mutation. Mendelian Genetics
No Evolution

So why fill up pages and pages debating and spend hours researching whether Dwarf Wheat was created through controlled breeding of Mendelian Genetics or whether Dwarf Wheat was created using radiation or chemicals as genetically modified organism?

To me the argument is moot as in either case, Mendelian or GMO, No Evolution, no matter which way it didn't happen.
 
Last edited:
So what exactly is the point? ... To me, the argument is moot [because], in either case—Mendelian or GMO—no evolution. No matter which way, it didn't happen.

This was never about proving evolution.

It was about disproving your claim that mutations are sterile, not viable, and revert to type—by showing you (and the readers) a clear example of a mutation that is heritable, viable, and persistent across generations. Your original claim was simply incorrect. (I was also showing why using F1 hybrids to prove your point not only missed but was aiming at the wrong target.)

One of the most impactful examples of a viable, heritable mutation in modern agriculture is dwarf wheat, developed during the Green Revolution. This variety emerged from a naturally occurring mutation in a height-regulating gene, which produced wheat plants with shorter, sturdier stalks. Far from being sterile or nonviable, this trait bred true across generations and outperformed traditional wheat by reducing lodging and increasing yield. There was no reversion to some ancestral "type," and the mutation did not fade out; instead, it became the global standard for wheat cultivation.


Rht-B1b is found in Triticum dicoccoides, which is a tetraploid ancestor the hexaploidal domestic wheat.

If that is so, then the RhT-B1b are recessives that were expressed through the controlled breeding program in Japan and later in Mexico. using Mexican dwarf wheat.

The fact remains: if that is true, then the genes are recombination, no mutation. Mendelian genetics. No evolution.

First, your claim, that Rht-B1b is simply "found in Triticum dicoccoides" (wild emmer) is not supported by genetic evidence. In reality, the dwarfing allele is absent from typical wild emmer; it is a derived mutation in the B-genome copy (Rht-B1) that arose in a cultivated Japanese line (Daruma), long after hexaploid wheat already existed.

Edited to add: Genetic evidence from sequencing, genotyping, and breeding studies consistently shows that T. dicoccoides carries the wild-type allele Rht-B1a, not the dwarfing mutant Rht-B1b (source).
And is Rht-B1b recessive? No, it is semi-dominant: Heterozygotes are shorter than wild type but taller than homozygous dwarfs. This is due to the dose effect of the GA-insensitive DELLA protein. If it were a simple recessive, you would see no dwarfing in heterozygotes. That is not the case.

Finally, the breeding uses recombination, but the dwarfing allele exists because of an original mutation. It is a derived mutation, not just a recombination of pre-existing wild alleles.
 
Last edited:
"Point mutations have been induced in dwarf wheat. These mutations, often induced by mutagens like ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) or gamma-ray irradiation, can alter genes involved in gibberellin (GA) biosynthesis or signaling pathways, leading to reduced plant height. Specifically, mutations in genes like Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b, which are DELLA genes, have been linked to dwarfism in wheat."
This may be true. But, from what I have read the "mutation" was only a "regression"...the plant grew smaller. They discovered this plant and began to apply it to their application.
 
This may be true. But, from what I have read the "mutation" was only a "regression"...the plant grew smaller. They discovered this plant and began to apply it to their application.
Yes, a regression would be reverting to an earlier form. Landrace wheats (traditional, locally adapted) were used to develop the hybrid dwarf wheat.

RhT 1b in dwarf wheat could be recessive.
Africans have recessive blue eyed genes.
Brown Eyed Dogs have recessive blue eyed genes, only 1 copy.
A brown eyed dog with 1 blue eyed gene mates with brown eyed dog 1 blue eyed gene. Voila 2 blue eyed puppy. So cute! The breeders of domestic dogs select for blue eyes, establishing the trait in domestic lines.
That does not require any mutation of the genes. It requires that the gene was "in the box.

Dwarf Wheat could also be genetically modified as chemical and irradiation manipulation of genes were widely experimental in the 1920's and 1930's.

Finally, the breeding uses recombination, but the dwarfing allele exists because of an original mutation. It is a derived mutation, not just a recombination of pre-existing wild alleles.
Mutation is mistake:
It is mistake in the coding of the gene.
If as you assert, RhT 1b is a mistake in recombination of genetic material specific to wheat, it is therefore a form of recombination, (derived mutation from existing genetic material)
Nothing from outside genetic wheat is added or subtracted.
It is all wheat, regressed, recessed or radiated.

"DNA is made up of the four nucleotides A, T, C, and G (adenine thymine cytosine and guanine). There are many points during a cells life in which a mutation can occur, resulting in a change in one of these nucleotides. For example, the enzymes responsible for replicating the DNA during a cell division are prone to making mistakes. Even though there is cellular machinery in place to check for and repair these mistakes, some well go unresolved. Other mutagens involve chemicals, cellular conditions or electromagnetic waves."
 
Last edited:
A regression would be reverting to an earlier form. Landrace wheats (traditional, locally adapted) were used to develop the hybrid dwarf wheat.
I don't see a regressions as that. I see a regression as the removal of certain genetic information rather than causing an enhancement of the fitness of the organism. Just as mutations can't add up over time and enhance a trait..especiall evolve one they can cause evolution to "run backwards" so to speak.

As an example check out the blind cave fish.
 
Last edited:
@CrowCross Quite
The genes for eyes are still present in the embryos of the cave fish.
The genes are silenced in cave fish
"Epigenetic regulation is a process where genes are turned off or on, typically in a reversible or temporary"
All fish have the genetic code for fish eyes.
Nothing added, nothing subtracted, no evolution

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/new...s-identify-how-eye-loss-occurs-blind-cavefish
I kinda doubt that article. They say...
"Loss of eye tissue in blind cavefish (Astyanax mexicanus), which occurs within a few days of their development, happens through epigenetic silencing of eye-related genes, according to a study led by the National Institutes of Health. Epigenetic regulation is a process where genes are turned off or on, typically in a reversible or temporary manner. This mechanism differs from genetic mutations, which are permanent changes in the DNA code. The study appears in Nature Ecology & Evolution."

Maybe I'm reading it wrong.....but they make it sound like if the blind cave fish is born in "light" the eyes will return when the eye-related genes are turned back on.
 
But they make it sound like if the blind cave fish is born in "light" the eyes will return when the eye-related genes are turned back on.
God created Fish. God created all the genes for fish.
All fish have Fish genes.
Trout have very good eyesight
Cave fish, blind, have all the genes including eyes that are in Fish.
All variations of Fish have the same genes and the mechanism to express or silence those genes.
Gene are silenced or expressed to create variations. All the splendor of God's creation, according to the will of God.
Nothing added, nothing subtracted, no evolution
 
Last edited:
God created Fish. God created all the genes for fish.
All fish have Fish genes.
Trout have very good eyesight
Cave fish, blind, have all the genes including eyes that are in Fish.
All variations of Fish have the same genes and the mechanism to express or silence those genes.
Gene are silenced or expressed to create variations. All the splendor of God's creation, according to the will of God.
Nothing added, nothing subtracted, no evolution
From what you wrote can I deduce that the genetic make up of man according to your belief is that mans DNA hasn't decayed so-to-speak and is like the original DNA that Adam had?
 
Back
Top