Argument against the Doctrine of the Trinity. (And keep it clean, please.)

[Josheb]

I'm answering questions..........

pfffffft!

 

[Josheb]

his Jesus though is same one of the JW

For the sake of my observation that is irrelevant. The problem that exists anytime Jesus' ontology is discussed is the problem of ambiguity. Non-Trins and Trins do not assign identical meaning s to words. The word "Jesus" or "Christ" has an entirely different meaning to the Jew than it does to the LDS and neither use the words the same way a modalist or a classic Trinitarian use the words. The result is two (or more) participants speaking past one another, wrongly imagining something of substance has been communicated to the other person when that is not the case.

@Paul claims he is not a JW, so he should not be treated as such (although if it quacks like a duck..... ). Might help if someone asked, and he provided a statement regarding who and what he believes Jesus is (in addition to merely saying he is the Son of God).

 

[makesends]

If you seen the Son you have seen the Father because the Father is living in Him doing His work. They are one.

A being with no beginning cannot be from another as a Son nor would such a being have a God. As is the Father alone the only true God

Only Jesus' physical body had a beginning. The Son of God did not. You are looking at it backwards.

 

[makesends]

I'm answering questions but it's getting to a point where I'm going to stop as I have better things to do.

Gotta have the last word, then?