R
Runningman
Guest
Someone called Jesus good and then Jesus' answer was no, the one who is good is God. Therefore Jesus is not God. He denied being God.Asking does not necessitate denying.
Someone called Jesus good and then Jesus' answer was no, the one who is good is God. Therefore Jesus is not God. He denied being God.Asking does not necessitate denying.
Someone called Jesus good and then Jesus' answer was no,
The common sense reading of Mark 10:18 is that Jesus denied being God. Read it again:Fred answered you correctly.
Runningman: Among countless other proofs that Jesus is not God, perhaps the one of the clearest examples is he simply denied it.Fred: You are in error, because asking doesn't necessitate denying.Jesus affirmed that God alone is good, but He is not denying He is good nor is He denying being God. He is saying "God alone" is good, but that doesn't mean Jesus excludes Himself from being good or from being God.
Here is the thing, you, as a Unitarian, would only see Matthew 19:17 as an opaque context similar to a first century Jew because you deny that Jesus Christ is God. While Fred, on the other hand, is see Luke 18:19 from an extensional context because he affirms that Jesus Christ is God. Read the OP for extensional context.
If you take an unbiased person who has no concept of both "Jesus Christ is God" and "Jesus Christ is not God," and then, you isolate Matthew 19:17 and Luke 18:19 from the whole of Scriptures (John 1:1, 18, Colossians 2:9, Hebrews 1:8, John 8:58-59, John 5:18, 10:31-33, 2 Peter 1:1, John 20:28, 1 John 5:20, Titus 2:13, Romans 9:5) for extensional context that unbiased person might draw that conclusion. Take the example of Clark Kent and Superman, we considered to be co-referential expressions of the self-same person. That doesn’t mean that people’s knowledge of them is also identical. They don't have that extensional context. I, and you, we both know that Clark Kent is, in fact, Superman. Even though you can trivially say that “people know that Superman is Superman only," it won’t necessarily be truthful to say that “people know that Clark Kent is Superman” (substitute “Superman” with “Clark Kent”), because what people know about Superman isn’t identical to what people know about Clark Kent. So, whatever survey you did or didn't do wasn't accurate and misleading.
For instance, consider the following example of an opaque context:
Premise 1: Lois Lane thinks Superman can fly.
Premise 2: Lois Lane thinks Clark Kent cannot fly.
Conclusion: Therefore Superman and Clark Kent are not the same person.
Why? Because Lois Lane doesn't have extensional context like me, and you do.
Mark 10
Person 1 denies being good
Mark 10The boldface above is mine of your quote.
The word "no" is your delusion.
Jesus said "no one" is good except God.
No this is correct. When Jesus said none is good except God alone then that means Jesus was denying being God. No one in the Bible believes Jesus is God. There aren't any examples of this in all of scripture.Nope. Wrong again.
That is not a denial.
Mark 10
18“Why do you call Me good?” Jesus replied. “No one is good except God alone.
No this is correct. When Jesus said none is good except God alone then that means Jesus was denying being God.
Jesus was called good then he redirected that goodness to someone else who isn't himself. Jesus isn't God bro. Yes I will repeat it as often as necessary.Wrong. It means Jesus is saying only God is good.
Your heresy has to slip in that it is a denial but the text doesn't say that.
Jesus was called good then he redirected that goodness to someone else
Jesus' words aren't going away. There is no way Mark 10:18 will somehow turn into Jesus claiming to be God because he was denying it. Jesus never directly claimed to be God, never asked anyone to worship him, never asked anyone to pray to him, and in several instances directly denied being God. I haven't even gone on to all of the other denials yet.Assumption on your part.
Jesus can be saying that by the man calling Him good he was calling Him God.
Jesus didn't deny being good and He didn't deny being God.
You read that into the text when the text doesn't say that.
Jesus' words aren't going away.
There is no way Mark 10:18 will somehow turn into Jesus claiming to be God because he was denying it.
Not good news for you. You keep saying Jesus is God when he denied it. He denied it repeatedly.Great.
You keep saying Jesus is God when he denied it.
If you asked me about what’s good and I said there is none good except God then it’s a denial that I am God. Jesus denied being God.Asking does not necessitate a denial.
Great and Psalm 110:1 proves Jesu isn’t YHWH. Case closed.John 5:41
“I do not accept (praise,worship, glory) from human beings,
Matthew 4:10
Jesus said to him, “Away from me, Satan! For it is written: ‘Worship (the Lord / Yahwah) your God, and serve him only.’”
Luke 4:8
Jesus answered, “It is written: ‘Worship (the Lord / Yahwah) your God and serve him only.’”
Exodus 20:3
3 “You shall have no other (gods / elohiym) (before / besides) me.
The common sense reading of Mark 10:18 is that Jesus denied being God. Read it again:
Mark 10
Person 1 = Jesus
Person 2 = God
Person 1 denies being good but instead calls person person 2 the one who is good. That plainly means Jesus is not the one who is good, but God is and that isn't himself. I even added some color. The blue person isn't the red person.
Try it out:
In the play sentence, do you see that Tom denied being commendable by saying that Ted alone is commendable?
“Why do you call me commendable?” Tom replied. “No one is commendable except Ted alone."
Someone called Jesus good and then Jesus' answer was no, the one who is good is God. Therefore Jesus is not God. He denied being God.
The List!