• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

The Invitation System and the Altar Call

I don't think it causes confusion to say that faith/belief comes as a result of God's grace. It fits with what Paul writes in Ephesians 2 where he repeatedly says that salvation is all of God's grace.
Faith/belief in God is not an infused gift as some would claim. It does not come in regeneration. Salvation is not monergistic. So, yes, I think saying that faith/belief comes as a result of God's grace, while not wrong, can be confusing. And that confusion is demonstrated by Calvinistic soteriology.

Yes, salvation is all of God's grace, but it is salvation, not grace, that is the gift specified in Ephesians 2. The grace in Ephesians 2:8 is not speaking it as a gift. Rather, I believe, it is speaking of God's attribute of graciousness. Theologically the term “grace” has three basic connotations. It can refer to the gift of salvation, that which is given; it can refer to the system of salvation, the manner in which the gift is received; or it can refer to that attribute in God’s nature that makes it all possible. I believe that the reference to grace in Ephesians 2:8 concerns this last one, grace in the sense of God’s graciousness. Grace is the most extreme expression of God’s love when it comes face to face with sin. Grace is God’s willingness and desire to forgive and accept the sinner in spite of his sin, to give the sinner the very opposite of what he deserves.
 
Last edited:
Faith/belief in God is not an infused gift as some would claim. It does not come in regeneration. Salvation is not monergistic. So, yes, I think saying that faith/belief comes as a result of God's grace, while not wrong, can be confusing. And that confusion is demonstrated by Calvinistic soteriology.
Well, as a believer in the doctrines of grace, I don't think that Calvinistic soteriology demonstrates confusion. But I know Christians differ on these things. Thanks for replying.
 
Well, as a believer in the doctrines of grace, I don't think that Calvinistic soteriology demonstrates confusion. But I know Christians differ on these things. Thanks for replying.
Personally, I think it is worse that confusion; I think it is wrong. Fortunately for all of us, one can be both wrong and saved.
 
Personally, I think it is worse that confusion; I think it is wrong. Fortunately for all of us, one can be both wrong and saved.
Thank you for your good-hearted post. So oft, when two people disagree on a particular point of doctrine, the posts tend to become bitter and far from Christian. Thanks again.
 
Faith/belief in God is not an infused gift as some would claim. It does not come in regeneration. Salvation is not monergistic. So, yes, I think saying that faith/belief comes as a result of God's grace, while not wrong, can be confusing. And that confusion is demonstrated by Calvinistic soteriology.

Yes, salvation is all of God's grace, but it is salvation, not grace, that is the gift specified in Ephesians 2. The grace in Ephesians 2:8 is not speaking it as a gift. Rather, I believe, it is speaking of God's attribute of graciousness. Theologically the term “grace” has three basic connotations. It can refer to the gift of salvation, that which is given; it can refer to the system of salvation, the manner in which the gift is received; or it can refer to that attribute in God’s nature that makes it all possible. I believe that the reference to grace in Ephesians 2:8 concerns this last one, grace in the sense of God’s graciousness. Grace is the most extreme expression of God’s love when it comes face to face with sin. Grace is God’s willingness and desire to forgive and accept the sinner in spite of his sin, to give the sinner the very opposite of what he deserves.
The New Living Translation defines it power of God the best.

Faith is the "let there be power". that works in those born from above. testified by it was good.

Ephesians 2:8 NLT God saved you by his grace when you believed. And you can’t take credit for this; it is a gift from God.

Most do not recognize the faith or power of Christ (let there be) as it is written by the finger of Chrsit

Christ the one source of faith is written is never alone . Let there be and the work of faith, Christ labor of love "alone is good" .

The power to will and to do .

Ephesians 2:8 King James Version For by grace are ye saved through faith; (Christ) and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

According to his powerful "let there be" and "it was good" faith power

Then one can faithfully as a work compare the spiritual understanding in Ephesian 2 to James 2.

James 2:1 NLV My Christian brothers, our Lord Jesus Christ is the Lord of shining-greatness. Since your trust is in Him, do not look on one (dying ) person as more important than another.

James 2:1 KJ21 My brethren, have not the faith of (Power coming from) our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect to dying mankind.
 
The New Living Translation defines it power of God the best.

Faith is the "let there be power". that works in those born from above. testified by it was good.

Ephesians 2:8 NLT God saved you by his grace when you believed. And you can’t take credit for this; it is a gift from God.

Most do not recognize the faith or power of Christ (let there be) as it is written by the finger of Chrsit

Christ the one source of faith is written is never alone . Let there be and the work of faith, Christ labor of love "alone is good" .

The power to will and to do .

Ephesians 2:8 King James Version For by grace are ye saved through faith; (Christ) and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

According to his powerful "let there be" and "it was good" faith power

Then one can faithfully as a work compare the spiritual understanding in Ephesian 2 to James 2.

James 2:1 NLV My Christian brothers, our Lord Jesus Christ is the Lord of shining-greatness. Since your trust is in Him, do not look on one (dying ) person as more important than another.

James 2:1 KJ21 My brethren, have not the faith of (Power coming from) our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect to dying mankind.
Faith has no power. It is God who has the power to say those who believe in Him.
 
Oh, I can see regeneration and justification in the passage.
I don't agree with your definition of conversion, but that is a different subject.
How is that a different subject than what we are discussing? If you would, give your definition or understanding of conversion. Because it seems you're just trying to avoid it.

But I absolutely do not see your concept of election in that passage; and that because it is not there.
Well sure it is. Or, at least how it works among God's people. Look at Romans 10:9-10 again.
There is nothing in Romans 10 that speaks about any of TULIP -- nothing.
You are right, it does not mention TULIP. Very observant.
> In Calvinism, faith comes not by hearing but by being regenerated.
If we are going to discuss this, let's be honest with each other. Say something like, you do not believe in Calvinism: faith comes not by hearing but by being regenerated.
But stop telling me what Calvinism teaches because you obviously do not know.

Romans 10 rejects that. To be saved is to be regenerated, justified and (initially) sanctified; thus, to be regenerated is to be saved.
9 that if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved; 10 for with the heart a person believes, resulting in righteousness, and with the mouth he confesses, resulting in salvation. Romans 10.

You see Jim, (that if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved; ) . . .
Now, I believe we both agree that the external call precedes the infusion of new life (regeneration). So, the external call, not only follows the act of regeneration but also precedes it in point of time. So, to be sure, the operation of the Holy Spirit upon the heart in regeneration is an act which is impossible to understand and escapes our notice. Consider John 3:8, The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear the sound of it, but you do not know where it is coming from and where it is going; so is everyone who has been born of the Spirit.”
And since regeneration takes place below the seat of consciousness, we cannot state the definite time of rebirth. But we can know how it is done at least partly.
If you believe it is through prevenient grace, you have a lot of proving to do, and I say you cannot, as scripture teaches no such thing.


The external call and prevenient grace are not taught in scripture for salvation. One has to have a knowledge of who Christ is, if there is no knowledge of Christ in a man's mind, the new life cannot function. To exercise faith in Christ would be an utter impossibility if there is no knowledge of Christ.

It never comes down to man as to whether or not the (prevenient) grace God has given him with actually save him. If that were the case, man's actions would have the determining effect of bringing him into the kingdom.
In God's word, there is no such thing as a saving (prevenient) grace of God, which prepares man to make a decision for salvation.
God's saving grace is always efficacious. It never touches a person without bringing him into actual contact with Jesus Christ and making him a partaker of His salvation.

So, consider vs: 10
for with the heart a person believes, resulting in righteousness, and with the mouth he confesses, resulting in salvation.

Only when a man is regenerated, with the heart he believes, resulting in righteousness. Being a new man in Christ, he realizes it and confesses Christ, hence - conversion.

Blessings
 
I don't agree with your definition of conversion,
I'll be waiting for your definition of conversion. I'm interested in how you understand it.


Thanks
 
Faith is the fundamental requirement or condition for being saved. It is not the only one, but it certainly is the critical one. And that comes by hearing the word of God (the word about Christ) not from regeneration. Regeneration is one aspect of being saved. Justification and (initial) sanctification are two other aspects of being saved. All occur at the same instant in time in the life of the repentant believer. To be saved is to be regenerated, justified and (initially) sanctified and that comes through faith which comes by hearing.
What I asked was, "PLEASE explain, how Romans 10 makes it clear that believing and confessing are requirements for becoming saved." Notice the word, "BECOMING", in that request. You say they are requirements, but for BEING, not for BECOMING. Even supposing you have made your point that they are requirements for BEING saved, you have not shown how one becomes saved, when, as it says two chapters earlier (in addition to Romans 10 about an obstinate people), that the mind of the unregenerate is unable to submit to the law, nor even to please God. That is context. So is the rest of Romans, where we read over and over that the unregenerate is AT ENMITY with God. If you think that salvific faith does not please God, demonstrate it. Yet you continue with the notion that the unregenerate ARE able to produce salvific faith, and, apparently, on their own, to cease hostilities toward God.

(Also consider that God has not ceased hostilities toward his enemies.)

When anyone hears the Gospel in the one sense —that is, 'in the flesh'— and not in the sense of hearing it in the Spirit, they still do not "have ears to hear". I know it is hard for you to understand that, because to you (apparently), there is no difference spiritually in the lost and the saved except in degree —not in category.

Notice the beginning of verse 14 of Romans 10; after declaring in verse 13 that every one who calls upon the name of the Lord will be saved, Paul asks: "How, then, can they call on the one they have not believed in?" I read you claiming (to @Carbon ) that Romans 10 says nothing about TULIP. I'm seeing Total Depravity out the ying-yang in Romans 10.

For now I won't argue whether believing and confessing are requirements for BEING saved. That can wait.

You need to show how they are requirements for BECOMING saved. The two things —being, and becoming— are not the same thing.


Occurs to me to add, concerning your conversation with @Carbon , that Reformed theology and TULIP are not one and the same thing. The Gospel is not TULIP, nor does Reformed doctrine teach that it is. It is just an easy and eye-opening commentary in opposition to Arminianism, that is backed up in Romans 10 and the rest of Romans, and in fact, the rest of the Bible. I have many relatives who are adamantly opposed to Calvinism, who admit to all of TULIP, except for "Limited Atonement". You are an outlier in this matter. Most believers who have tried living for the Lord have well experienced their inability, even as believers, to do anything good, apart from God doing it in them. They just don't know how to justify what they have been taught with what they have experienced there.
 
Last edited:
I've always imagined that if I were ever able to Preach a Sermon, I would end it by saying something Biblical; something in accord with Isaiah 55:1-3...

Come, all you who are thirsty,
come to the waters;
and you who have no money,
come, buy and eat!
Come, buy wine and milk
without money and without cost.
Why spend money on what is not bread,
and your labor on what does not satisfy?
Listen, listen to me, and eat what is good,
and you will delight in the richest of fare.
Give ear and come to [Jesus];
listen, that you may live.
[He] will make an everlasting covenant with you...


I understand why some are against Alter Calls; that's the reason I would use a Biblical one...
 
I've always imagined that if I were ever able to Preach a Sermon, I would end it by saying something Biblical; something in accord with Isaiah 55:1-3...

Come, all you who are thirsty,
come to the waters;
and you who have no money,
come, buy and eat!
Come, buy wine and milk
without money and without cost.
Why spend money on what is not bread,
and your labor on what does not satisfy?
Listen, listen to me, and eat what is good,
and you will delight in the richest of fare.
Give ear and come to [Jesus];
listen, that you may live.
[He] will make an everlasting covenant with you...


I understand why some are against Alter Calls; that's the reason I would use a Biblical one...
Food Stamps ~ by ReverendRV * April 12

Isaiah 55:1 NIV
; "Come, all you who are thirsty, come to the waters; and you who have no money, come, buy and eat! Come, buy wine and milk without money and without cost.

We see from our Bible verse that the “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program” has been around for thousands of years; there is nothing new under the Sun. Even President Johnson used a program which already existed, and changed it into the Food Stamp Program. The politics about this are always debated but you don’t hear it so much these days, because it’s now an accepted way of life. They used to say “If they don’t work, they shouldn’t eat’; but most people on the program really need help. For some there’s no way they can work at all. They go to a store to buy food without money and without cost. ~ SO much of this reminds me of what Isaiah said, but he is talking about food no one knows about; the bread that comes from Heaven, food for the Soul. This was called Angel Food in the Old Testament but in the New Testament, Jesus calls himself the Bread of Life. ~ Have you ever tried to earn your own way to Heaven?

There are two ways to get to Heaven; through Good Works or by the Grace of God. God has put us all to Work, and a Worker is worth his wages; imagine all you can buy yourself, never depending on ‘Spiritual’ Welfare. ~ What would you call anyone who buttered up your spouse with Lies? A Liar, right? Have ‘you’ told a Lie? Sure you have; you’ve earned a spiritual wage but it’s not paid with Heavenly currency. Have you committed Adultery outside of Marriage? Jesus said that Lusting for someone is Adultery from your Heart; have you Coveted your neighbor’s Wife? I used to hang out at my friend’s house because of his wife; I wasn’t much of a friend. ~ These are only three of the Ten Commandments, if God judged you by this standard, would you be innocent or guilty? God pays you wages for what you’ve done wrong; would you go to Heaven or Hell? You’re spiritually poor, Bankrupt! You need to apply for Spiritual Welfare…

Even though we can take Food Stamps and buy without money and without cost; somebody has to pay. ~ For God so loved the world he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in him shall not perish but have everlasting Life! Jesus pays the bill in three ways; he lived a Sinless life that pleased God, he shed his blood on the Cross to pay the price for his people, and he arose from the grave alive to show his Credit was accepted. We’re Saved by the Grace of God through Faith in the risen Savior Jesus Christ, without our tipping God with our Works. Repent of your Sins, Confess Jesus Christ as your Lord God; and find a local Church who will help you understand that if you ever try to buy your Righteousness; Grace is no longer Grace and you will again earn the Wages of Death. ~ Salvation is a Welfare Program for sure; because no one but Jesus Christ was ever good enough to earn his way to Heaven. Christ said that all who come other ways are Liars and Robbers; to God, paying for your own Sin is a crime in and of itself…

Isaiah 55:2 NIV; Why spend money on what is not bread, and your labor on what does not satisfy? Listen, listen to me, and eat what is good, and you will delight in the richest of fare.
 
Why the Invitation System/Altar Call Should Not Be Used

1. There is not a single instance in the Bible of Christians using an altar call or invitation to come forward. If God intended this as a method of evangelizing, why didn't He say so or give us an example in His Word?

Amen to that.
Obviously, I think God did give us an example of an Alter Call in his Word...

Ho, everyone that thirsteth, come ye to the waters
These are the words not of the prophet, but of the Lord, as what follows throughout the chapter shows; and are directed to the Gentiles, as Aben Ezra thinks: and indeed their conversion is manifestly spoken of in it; and who, Kimchi says, after the war of Gog and Magog, shall know that the Lord reigns, and shall come and be desirous of learning his judgments and laws. The word "ho" is expressive of calling, as the Jewish commentators rightly observe; and carries in it an invitation, in which there seems to be a commiseration of the case of the persons called and it is delivered in indefinite terms, and very openly and publicly; and has in it the nature of a Gospel call or invitation, to persons described as "thirsty"; not in natural, much less in a sinful sense, but in a spiritual one; thirsting after forgiveness of sin by the blood of Christ;
Sure; an Altar Call needs to be handled right. But it should be handled; it's not the same as Snake Handling...
 
Last edited:
3. The invitation system/altar call, because it is not Scriptural, is thus contrary to sola scriptura, which says that we are to get our beliefs and teachings from the Bible alone.
That's Solo Scriptura, not Sola Scriptura. Jews will tell you Mono Theistic Trinitarianism is not Biblical, and they would be right; it's Theological. Sure; Systematic Theology is Biblical, but it's a middle man of Biblical Doctrine...

But if we're to get our Beliefs from 'Solo' Scriptura without learning from those with the Spiritual Gift of Teaching the Word to Us; we have the plain Teaching of Isaiah 55:1-3...
 
I believe this sends a very bad message indeed. The call forward teaches us, that when we are ready, we come forward for Jesus, it's our choice, not God's.

It seems they are intentionally emotionally manipulating people into the belief they are sealed by the Holy Spirit, and therefore saved because of some emotional moment they conjured up.

That probably gets more church goers, which is what they are after, they aren't trying to save souls, just fill buildings with paying customers.
 
That's Solo Scriptura, not Sola Scriptura. Jews will tell you Mono Theistic Trinitarianism is not Biblical, and they would be right; it's Theological. Sure; Systematic Theology is Biblical, but it's a middle man of Biblical Doctrine...

But if we're to get our Beliefs from 'Solo' Scriptura without learning from those with the Spiritual Gift of Teaching the Word to Us; we have the plain Teaching of Isaiah 55:1-3...
Teach us the difference. I'm not saying there is no difference, nor even that I don't know the difference, but that I want to understand why you insist here that it's "'Solo' Scriptura" rather than "Sola Scriptura".
 
Teach us the difference. I'm not saying there is no difference, nor even that I don't know the difference, but that I want to understand why you insist here that it's "'Solo' Scriptura" rather than "Sola Scriptura".
When I talk about Solo Scriptura, I talk about people only wanting to believe a Doctrine when there is a 'Verbatim Verse' teaching it. We get most of our Orthodoxy from Theology. For instance; the Hypostatic Union is spelled out for us in the Chalcedonian Creed...

If you're asking something else, we can zero-in...
 
5. The altar call causes confusion by equating coming down the aisle with coming to Christ. It is as if Jesus is somehow at the end of the aisle. But at the end of the aisle is the preacher, a man like any other. Trusting in Jesus Christ as our Savior is a gift the Holy Spirit works in our minds. It is not something that can only take place in a certain part of the room.
People think they are saved because they went forward. The preacher also thinks the person was saved.
 
Yes, it is relevant. It refutes the Calvinist concept of election. Romans 10 makes it clear that believing and confessing are requirements for being saved. The Calvinist concept of election denies any such requirements.

As I said above, the only problem with the invitation system is that it is inconsistent with the false doctrines of Calvinism.
@JIM , the Verse is not about Unconditional Election, because Unconditional Election is not about anything we ever could do to deserve Election...

The Verse is about Good things we Do after Regeneration.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top