J
justbyfaith
Guest
I don't see that in Romans 9. Maybe you can quote the verses in question and expound on them.Asked and answered in Romans 9.
If you will not accept the answer from the Apostle Paul, why would you believe me?

I don't see that in Romans 9. Maybe you can quote the verses in question and expound on them.Asked and answered in Romans 9.
If you will not accept the answer from the Apostle Paul, why would you believe me?
So, God purposes to send certain people to hell?
I don't see that in Romans 9. Maybe you can quote the verses in question and expound on them.
They were not His people but are now His people...Here is the PARAGRAPH containing the answer:
Romans 9:19-26 [NASB]
19 You will say to me then, "Why does He still find fault? For who has resisted His will?" 20 On the contrary, who are you, you [foolish] person, who answers back to God? The thing molded will not say to the molder, "Why did you make me like this," will it? 21 Or does the potter not have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one object for honorable use, and another for common use? 22 What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath and to make His power known, endured with great patience objects of wrath prepared for destruction? 23 And [He did so] to make known the riches of His glory upon objects of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory, 24 [namely] us, whom He also called, not only from among Jews, but also from among Gentiles, 25 as He also says in Hosea: "I WILL CALL THOSE WHO WERE NOT MY PEOPLE, 'MY PEOPLE,' AND HER WHO WAS NOT BELOVED, 'BELOVED.'" 26 "AND IT SHALL BE THAT IN THE PLACE WHERE IT WAS SAID TO THEM, 'YOU ARE NOT MY PEOPLE,' THERE THEY SHALL BE CALLED SONS OF THE LIVING GOD."
- Paul begins by establishing that God as the absolute creator has the RIGHT to do with His creation whatever He wishes. We have no grounds for objecting.
- The underlined portion answered your question about WHY (even though God owed us no explanation). God is willing to demonstrate His wrath (that means sending people to hell) to “make His power known”. The reason God chooses to make His power known is to “make known the riches of His glory” upon us to whom He chooses to show mercy.
- You may understand the answer. You may partially understand the answer. You may not understand the answer at all. Whatever the case, Paul HAS answered the question for you.
So your request of me was dishonest. You had no intention to “listen” to what I said … you were just “waiting to speak.”Here is my teaching on Romans 9.
You are wrong there. I am always interested in receiving new input. The fact that I was willing to give my own input in no way means that I will never consider yours.So your request of me was dishonest. You had no intention to “listen” to what I said … you were just “waiting to speak.”
So noted.
NO! Lol, wow. How is it merit based? NOBODY merits salvation —not even the elect. The Elect are chosen because of God's love and purposes for them.So there's NOTHING UNCONDITIONAL about your version of "Election" - it's all "Merit based".
In the human (temporal) vernacular, God 'decided' to create the Bride of Christ, and Dwelling Place of God, (and a few other names) for the finally saved. So he created the beings who would become that. They are called the Elect; they are saved according to God's time and purposes in this temporal realm, and will inherit the kingdom of God. What is arbitrary about that?I've gotten it from a couple of people on these boards, EXACTLY which ones I don't remember.
What I DO KNOW is that Calvinists take great EXCEPTION to "Election" being totally arbitrary (unconditional - "U"), and so invent "Work arounds". God just "arbitrarily" picking names out of a hat, and dumping them mindlessly into "Elect", and "Firewood" boxes just doesn't sit well.
So how DOES GOD select the "Elect", discarding everybody else in the process?? What's YOUR version???
I even saw that it's merit-based. Those who are rejected are rejected because of their sin and because they are enemies of God. They are rejected based on their lack of merit.NO! Lol, wow. How is it merit based? NOBODY merits salvation —not even the elect. The Elect are chosen because of God's love and purposes for them.
So, they are disobedient based on God's sovereign decision to make them disobedient?In the human (temporal) vernacular, God 'decided' to create the Bride of Christ, and Dwelling Place of God, (and a few other names) for the finally saved. So he created the beings who would become that. They are called the Elect; they are saved according to God's time and purposes in this temporal realm, and will inherit the kingdom of God. What is arbitrary about that?
Everybody else was created for whatever purpose God "had in mind" concerning them. By obedience and disobedience both, they fulfill everything God had in 'mind' concerning them, just as is true concerning the Elect.
Most of the things you have claimed Calvinists believe are, rather, your conclusions upon what you understand them to believe. It's your wording. It may well represent what you understood them to mean, but not what they say. I have known many calvinists, and have read and/or listened to many more, and I don't hear any of them put it the way you do.I trust that what I have heard taught by Calvinists is what Calvinists believe. I do not report anything about that, that I have not heard.
yes...because I make the logical conclusions based on what they say that escapes them because they are blinded by devotion to their doctrine.Most of the things you have claimed Calvinists believe are, rather, your conclusions upon what you understand them to believe. It's your wording. It may well represent what you understood them to mean, but not what they say. I have known many calvinists, and have read and/or listened to many more, and I don't hear any of them put it the way you do.
No, it is not arbitrary (except inasmuch as it is based on the whim of God)...it is based on God's purpose that they are cast into the lake of fire...which, in my opinion, is 1,000 times worse!What is arbitrary about that?
No, they were rejected before they had even done anything good or bad, according to Romans 9:11. They are condemned because of their sin.I even saw that it's merit-based. Those who are rejected are rejected because of their sin and because they are enemies of God. They are rejected based on their lack of merit.
If that's all you disagree with Calvinism about, you don't disagree with Calvinism, because Romans 10:9-13 doesn't disagree with Calvinism.I disagree with Calvinism where Romans 10:9-13 disagrees with Calvinism.
Well, it isn't a good hermeneutic that interprets scripture and builds doctrine on one's notion of love, instead of on what the Bible says.No, it is not arbitrary (except inasmuch as it is based on the whim of God)...it is based on God's purpose that they are cast into the lake of fire...which, in my opinion, is 1,000 times worse!
That is not a God of love...who purposely creates people with a destiny of burning in eternal flames.
We are fearfully and wonderfully made.
The only God who is a God of love is the God who is not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance.
Calvinism doesn't differ from Romans 10:9-13. It's all true.Already did. Just read what I wrote concerning Romans 10:9-13.