Eternal Justification?

[makesends]

Paul was being used as an analogy for GOD in the example, so if GOD does not keep his word, then our unforgiven sins are the least of our problems ... we are "sinners in the hands of an evil god" [thus have MUCH bigger problems than sin].

@Arial's statement was ridiculous, no doubt, and she would agree with you about whether God keeps his word. In fact, I have argued that another poster's "thought question" (as he called it) was useless for proving his thesis, because there is no "what-if God does not keep his promise".

I said it was a good way to look at it—not "It is a good question". She took it to an extreme so that the opposition could see where their logic leads.

 

[brightfame52]

What do you mean "This want about Paul as well?" That makes no sense.

See post 205 it should have read " it was about Paul as well"

[MOD WARNING: This post violates rule 4.4. However, it is being left in place because it's a mere clarification. Any further posts must comply with rule 4.4.]
​

 

[Arial]

See post 205 it should have read " it was about Paul as well"

The scripture was about Paul, but my question was not, and you know that. However, if you answered my question with obvious answer: "No, Paul's promise to pay the debt did not actually pay the debt." then you would be showing proof that your assertion that Christ agreeing to be surety of a better covenant does not actually do the work of being the surety.

So that is settled. No more needs to be said about it and any more that is said about it before you do what is required by the rules as stated in Post #239, will be deleted.