• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

THE ANGELS THAT SINNED

OK. what are those unanswered questions?
We shall get to that!
But before we begin it is important that you show you are a child of truth by accepting the Word of Truth written by the Spirit of Truth in 2 Peter 2:4 about the God is Truth.
One does not have to agree with your interpretation of 2 Peter 2:4 to prove anything.

4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment; 2 Pe 2:4.
2 Peter 2:4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;

Yes I believe this is truth I just believe it started at Genesis 6.

5 And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;

I also believe the result of Genesis 6 was the major factor for why God destroyed the world by flood.

6 And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;

Tell us what was the major sin referred to in scripture for Sodom and Gomorrha? Jude compared it to the sin of the angels in Jude 7.

Trust me Brother it is not a requirement that I believe 2 Peter 2:4 the same way you do to be saved. You are off the reservation on that.

It says the angels that sinned.
Yep
That would mean all the angels that sinned.
Nope it does not mean all the angels that fell committed the same sin. I haver shown that from scripture post yours.
God cast them to hell and delivered them in chains of darkness awaiting judgment.
Yes the ones that committed the sin mentioned in Jude.
Peter makes no mention as you do that these angels that sinned - spirit beings - married women - of whom these women cannot see spirit-beings and had children with them when angels have no genitals, all are masculine, and it would violate the ordinance of God created in the created species of the planet earth that horses mate with horses "after their kind" and whales mate with whales "after their kind."
This is an ordinance in creation, and it is inviolable.
Okay you are now repeating yourself, already dealt with most of these claims.

Jude 6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.
 
I am not trying to "force" anything, I am giving reasons for what I believe based on my study. I will challenge things I disagree agree with the same as you do.
I believe there is one exception in scripture.
Zechariah 5:9 Then lifted I up mine eyes, and looked, and, behold, there came out two women, and the wind was in their wings; for they had wings like the wings of a stork: and they lifted up the ephah between the earth and the heaven.
10 Then said I to the angel that talked with me, Whither do these bear the ephah?
Not here to argue that point, but you brought it up.
Strong's defines the word as 'ishshah. It means "woman."
If it was an angel the word would be "malek."
And the prefix "ish" is translated as "woman" proper.
So, you're spiritualizing the word. Take it literally unless the context evidences otherwise.
Sure there is a fixed number, but neither you nor I know that number, and that number is irrelevant to what we are discussing.
You have no scripture to support that. If they can appear as human in other respects, who are you to say they cannot accomplish that as well?
God's angels are spirit beings. They don't have creative power. That alone belongs to God.
Not always, do we really need to list the multiple scriptures that disagree with you on this?
Nope, I explained that but you ignored it. I will try again. In the NT it is clear born again believers are referred to as the sons of God.


John 1:129 Then lifted I up mine eyes, and looked, and, behold, there came out two women, and the wind was in their wings; for they had wings like the wings of a stork: and they lifted up the ephah between the earth and the heaven.

You have NO SCRIPTURE from the OT that clearly says believers are sons of God, you assume that apparently based on the NT definition of sons of God which is a huge mistake.
As per the scriptures I posted there is evidence OT references to sons of God is angels and that is a very common belief in the Christian world.
You cannot possibly confirm that which scripture. It does fit your narrative but no scripture says that. If you disagree post it.
Sounds like forcing a narrative to me.
The Holy Spirit said in 2 Peter 2:4

4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment; 2 Pe 2:4.

You can't get past this Scripture truth.
There are no angels that sinned operating in the world today.
They are all cast down to hell delivered in chains of darkness awaiting judgment.
 
There are no angels that sinned operating in the world today.
They are all cast down to hell delivered in chains of darkness awaiting judgment.
Opinion. You have offered no scriptural evidence other than your opinion. I have offered evidence you are wrong . So here we going round in circles.
 
We shall get to that!

One does not have to agree with your interpretation of 2 Peter 2:4 to prove anything.

2 Peter 2:4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;

Yes I believe this is truth I just believe it started at Genesis 6.

5 And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;

I also believe the result of Genesis 6 was the major factor for why God destroyed the world by flood.

6 And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;

Tell us what was the major sin referred to in scripture for Sodom and Gomorrha? Jude compared it to the sin of the angels in Jude 7.

Trust me Brother it is not a requirement that I believe 2 Peter 2:4 the same way you do to be saved. You are off the reservation on that.

Yep

Nope it does not mean all the angels that fell committed the same sin. I haver shown that from scripture post yours.

Yes the ones that committed the sin mentioned in Jude.

Okay you are now repeating yourself, already dealt with most of these claims.


Jude 6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

Why do you ignore the context of Jude?
I don't.

5 I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not. 6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. Jude 4–6.

I just don't ascribe to angels (spirit-beings who have no body and have no creative Deific attributes to create one) are the "sons of God" in Genesis 6.
I place the "sinning" that they are placed in chains of darkness (same language as Peter) to a time BEFORE God created man (Heb. Adam.)
There was a time when God destroyed the earth.
I believe Genesis 1:1, "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." Finished. Complete. Done.
But in Genesis 1:2 it says, "And the earth was without form, and void, and darkness on the face of the deep."
So, what happen to the earth that rendered it without form and void and with darkness?
God destroyed the earth (and first heaven - the atmosphere from the ground to where outer space begins) in fierce anger:

23 I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was without form, and void;
And the heavens, and they had no light (darkness.)
24 I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled,
And all the hills moved lightly.
25 I beheld, and, lo, there was no man,
And all the birds of the heavens were fled.
26 I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness,
And all the cities thereof were broken down
At the presence of the LORD, and by his fierce anger.
Jer. 4:23–26.

"There was no man" (no 'Adam.')
The word birds is not the word used of the flying fowl. There is another Hebrew word used for 'flying bird-animal) from Genesis to Psalm 124.
And the "fruitful place" becoming a wilderness I take to mean earth after God created it in Genesis 1:1.
I also take Isaiah 24:1 also explains a lot.

Behold, the LORD cmaketh the earth empty, and maketh it waste,
And turneth it upside down, and scattereth abroad the inhabitants thereof.
Is 24:1.

I also believe that the earth of Genesis 1:1 was the fruitful place where God's angels had their ministry. I also know that cherubs guard earthly holy things and seraphim guard heavenly holy things:


12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!
How art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven,
I will exalt my throne above the stars of God:
I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.
15 Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.

16 They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying,
Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms;
17 That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof;
That opened not the house of his prisoners?
Is 14:12–17.

The throne of God would have been either at modern-day Jerusalem or nearby to that location. Now stay with me:

11 Moreover the word of the LORD came unto me, saying, 12 Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty. 13 Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created. 14 Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire. 15 Thou wast perfect (complete) in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee. 16 By the multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of thee with violence, and thou hast sinned: therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God: and I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire. 17 Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness: I will cast thee to the ground, I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee. Eze 28:11–17.

The word "anointed" means "outstretched."
Lucifer was covering the throne on the mountain of God, he was "outstretched" and in Samuel the "Mountain of God" is Jerusalem.
This places Lucifer outstretched above the throne of God on the mountain of God in first heaven (the atmosphere from the ground to where outer space begins.)
This mountain of God is also "Eden the Garden of God." If Adam committed his disobedience in the Garden of Eden the sacrifice to atone for that sinfulness was outside the city.
Since there is ONLY ONE God, there is NONE like Him and He gives His glory to NO ONE the one-third angels and man were created sin-ful, or as the word is defined, "missing the mark" of the glory of God.
That's why they sinned in their own capacity because as wickedness comes from the wicked" so does "sin come from sinner."

13 As saith the proverb of the ancients, Wickedness proceedeth from the wicked: 1 Sa 24:13.

The proverb of the ancients could be a reference to Adam and his sin.

So, in response to Lucifer's rebellion God destroyed the earth. If the gifts and callings of God are without repentance and Lucifer and the other sinning angels received gifts and callings ("outstretched") God could not recall their various ministries. So, to address this He destroyed the earth in FIERCE ANGER.
There is nowhere in Scripture "there was no man (Adam) and God destroying the earth in fierce anger except between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2, before God created man. Now, with the sinning angels cast down to hell delivered in chains of darkness reserved unto the judgment day God launched His Plan of Man.

This all comes together for me. There is nowhere in Scripture God could turn the earth UPSIDE DOWN but before man was created.
But to take spirit beings that cannot be seen and have no bodies as being involved in the sanctity of marriage with human women and having children in way out there to impossible.
Leaving their first estate (principality) and their habitation in Jude is the same language as Peter and it can only fir between the original creation of heaven and earth in Genesis 1:1 and the re-creation in Genesis 1:2 so that He, God, could launch His Plan of Man.
So, no, I don't ignore Jude.
I just don't accept that spirit beings you can't see, who have no genitals, involving themselves in the sanctity of marriage with human women and having children. God ordained "AFTER HIS KIND" and spirit beings and humans are incompatible. Impossible according to the ordinance of God in creation.
 
Opinion. You have offered no scriptural evidence other than your opinion. I have offered evidence you are wrong . So here we going round in circles.
No, other than the Scripture that says plainly that the angels that sinned (ALL OF THEM) were cast to hell delivered in chains of darkness awaiting judgment.
It's your interpretation of the Word that is askew.
I receive what Peter says in 2 Peter 2:4.
Literally for the context makes no other claim.
 
I just don't accept that spirit beings you can't see, who have no genitals, involving themselves in the sanctity of marriage with human women and having children.
You remind of a preacher friend with whom I had this discussion. He said to me “I cannot with scripture disprove anything you have said but I choose not to believe it”. I fully understand why some choose not to believe it but I believe the evidence is substantial. You seem to revolve your doctrine around one scripture even trying to judge my salvation on whether or not I agree with your assessment of 2 Peter. I interpret 2 Peter with the help of all relevant scripture comparing scripture with scripture. You seem to revolve this whole issue around your interpretation of 2 Peter. Not a wise move in my opinion.
 
This is so far from scripture it is hopeless. Poor pigs that had such bad attitudes they hurt themselves. How you expect credibility with nonsense like this?
Ever walk into a room a sense a heaviness or oppression?
Attitudes. All you got to do is look upon the countenance to see who it is exuding this 'spirit.'

The power of the mind is powerful indeed.
Before Christ dealt with a person with evil attitudes of the mind He had to subdue their evil attitudes.
Salvation occurs in the mind.
The mind is part of the soul.

15 And they come to Jesus, and see him that was possessed with the devil, and had the legion, sitting, and clothed, and in his right mind: and they were afraid. Mk 5:15.

When I became saved one of the things that changed in me was my attitude.
This occurs with everyone God saves.
They receive an uplifted attitude. They want to hug everyone and tell everyone what happen to them.
So, attitudes are very powerful especially when we worship and pray.
So, the heaviness and oppression of those attitudes were sent into/among the swine, and they spooked.
It's not nonsense when one learns the methods of the mind and how important a role it plays in salvation.
 
You remind of a preacher friend with whom I had this discussion. He said to me “I cannot with scripture disprove anything you have said but I choose not to believe it”. I fully understand why some choose not to believe it but I believe the evidence is substantial. You seem to revolve your doctrine around one scripture even trying to judge my salvation on whether or not I agree with your assessment of 2 Peter. I interpret 2 Peter with the help of all relevant scripture comparing scripture with scripture. You seem to revolve this whole issue around your interpretation of 2 Peter. Not a wise move in my opinion.
There is something definitely wrong with a professed Christian who rejects the Word of God for their own interpretation.
You evidence such a mindset.

The thing is that Peter says something that is definite. "The angels that sinned."
That means all of the angels that sinned.
These angels were cast to hell and delivered in chains of darkness awaiting judgment.
You can't get past this Scripture in order to postulate what you believe of other Scriptures.
When I come to a certain understanding about a Biblical doctrine and find Scripture that supports my understanding, I am good.
But if I run into a Scripture that contradicts the other passages and understandings I have and I can't get past that Scripture it has this tendency to make me reconsider what I have to that point believed.
So, because of that one Scripture I have to reassess my beliefs.
And I do that.
I don't ignore the Scripture I can't get past. It stops me COLD.
But that's not what it does to you.
You ignore that Scripture in 2 Peter 2:4 that should stop you cold and cause you to reconsider your LONG-HELD beliefs but you don't.
You ignore the Scripture and that is troublesome.
It's downright antichristian.
Antibiblical.
AntiGod.
 
Jeremiah 4:25

"...there was no man"

Transliteration: ʾādām
Phonetic Pronunciation: aw-dawm’

Strong's: from <H119> (‘adam); ruddy, i.e. a human being (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.)
 
Jeremiah 4:25

"...there was no man"

Transliteration: ʾādām
Phonetic Pronunciation: aw-dawm’

Strong's: from <H119> (‘adam); ruddy, i.e. a human being (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.)
Let me get this straight...everytime I see the word Man...I should translate it as Adam?

Wasn't it you who tried this same trick with the word bird and angels?
 
Let me get this straight...everytime I see the word Man...I should translate it as Adam?

Wasn't it you who tried this same trick with the word bird and angels?
Get yourself a Strong’s and learn the original words the Holy Spirit used in the original languages of the Bible.
 
Why you looking for hamartiology?
God didn't offer salvation to the sinning angels.
Scripture says:

4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment. 2 Pe 2:4.

"The angels that sinned" covers ALL the angels that sinned and this is one-third of the total created.
So, if ALL the angels that sinned were cast down to hell and delivered them into chains of darkness awaiting judgment then that means there are no angels that sinned that are loose upon creation.
Why are you having so much trouble with this truth?

The only adversary of God is on the planet, and they are human.
And this covers both saved people and non-saved people.

It doesn't say anything about the act of sin. Talk about eisegesis.

12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
God created man (Adam) sinful, fallen short of the glory of God. The word for sin is harmartia and it means "missing the mark."
What is the "mark?"
The glory of God.

13 (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
If there is a law against something Paul says we are guilty of it as sinners, even before we commit the act of that sin that God commands we do not commit.
Well guess what? The existence of the law shows us we are sinners.
"Thou shalt not [eat of it]" shows us Adam was a sinner BEFORE He sinned.
Sin does come from sinner, right?
Rom. 5:12–13.

Paul says:

7 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. Rom. 7:7.

Now let's apply it to Adam:
ADAM: "I had not known disobedience but by the law/command: for I had not known disobedience except the law/command said, thou shalt not [eat of it.]"

Paul does not say anything about the act of sin only that the existence of the law/command showed him he was a sinner and we know - at least some of us do - that sin comes from sinner.
Adam was a sinner before he sinned.

8 But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead. 9 For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died. 10 And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death. 11 For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me. 12 Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good. Rom. 7:8–12.

"Thou shalt not" in the Garden shows us Adam was a sinner BEFORE he sinned.
Perhaps he is wondering why , out of all names available , a demon confronting Jesus calls himself with a military name for being a huge number.
 
Get yourself a Strong’s and learn the original words the Holy Spirit used in the original languages of the Bible.
I have....what's your point? Does your Strongs say everytime we see the word man we should understand it as being Adam or a bird represents an angel?????

You do know it's not always the origination of a word that speaks of the meaning but also the context in which it is presented? Or am I wrong here?
 
Perhaps he is wondering why , out of all names available , a demon confronting Jesus calls himself with a military name for being a huge number.
The dude was out of his mind tripping.
Like when someone says they are Napoleon or Hitler.
Or Legion.
The man definitely had mental issues.
Besides the effect of sin on our bodies and mind I wouldn't be too quick to say someone today with mental issues is entirely having mental issues.
Some of that can be caused by warped minds caused by sin. If we can have defiled consciences is the mind free from the effects of sin?
How about the criminal mind?
The carnal mind?
Or the mind of a believer who has been healed of evil thoughts and attitudes.
And now can approach God to worship and pray "in his right mind."
But there is significance in what was said after:

15 And they come to Jesus, and see him that was possessed with the devil, and had the legion, sitting, and clothed, and in his right mind: and they were afraid. Mk 5:15.
 
Last edited:
I have....what's your point? Does your Strongs say everytime we see the word man we should understand it as being Adam or a bird represents an angel?????

You do know it's not always the origination of a word that speaks of the meaning but also the context in which it is presented? Or am I wrong here?
The word for "bird" (the fowl that fly) is one Hebrew word from Genesis to Psalms 124. The same word.
Why did the Holy Spirit change it in Jeremiah 4:24 to another word that isn't the same word for the flying fowl?
And how do you approach that "there was no man" [Adam]?
Literally of course. There was no man in the earth when God destroyed it in fierce anger. The whole earth.
When did God do that except in response to the sin found in his angels (one-third) before God created man?
There is also another Hebrew word for man. It's not always "Adam." There is one for "male." But not in Jer. 4.
And the word for angel in the OT is "malek."
You see, this is what separates believers from the casual unbeliever who tries to understand God's Word. If parables by Jesus kept certain people from understanding Him and His teaching wouldn't the same be applicable to unbelievers who try to understand the spiritual without the Spirit OR a human spirit?
Christ came to send division.
He does it through doctrine.
Only His kids understand the Word of God. Granted an unbeliever can understand John 11:35 "Jesus wept."
But like parables I believe Christ does dividing through Scripture as a whole.
What do you stink about that?
 
The word for "bird" (the fowl that fly) is one Hebrew word from Genesis to Psalms 124. The same word.
Why did the Holy Spirit change it in Jeremiah 4:24 to another word that isn't the same word for the flying fowl?
And how do you approach that "there was no man" [Adam]?
Literally of course. There was no man in the earth when God destroyed it in fierce anger. The whole earth.
When did God do that except in response to the sin found in his angels (one-third) before God created man?
There is also another Hebrew word for man. It's not always "Adam." There is one for "male." But not in Jer. 4.
And the word for angel in the OT is "malek."
You see, this is what separates believers from the casual unbeliever who tries to understand God's Word. If parables by Jesus kept certain people from understanding Him and His teaching wouldn't the same be applicable to unbelievers who try to understand the spiritual without the Spirit OR a human spirit?
Christ came to send division.
He does it through doctrine.
Only His kids understand the Word of God. Granted an unbeliever can understand John 11:35 "Jesus wept."
But like parables I believe Christ does dividing through Scripture as a whole.
What do you stink about that?
If that's what you need your bible to say...have at it.

You never did say where the birds went.
 
If that's what you need your bible to say...have at it.

You never did say where the birds went.
Well, since the word in Jeremiah 4 is not the word for the actual bird that flies, the fowl, the Holy Spirit used a different word. So, if He changes so are we supposed to change as well.
And I was never asked where they went but I implied it in my statements that these cuckoo birds flew the coop. They were cast down to hell delivered in chains of darkness awaiting judgment.
Just as Pete said.
So, you're going to have to change your theology as to where evil in mankind comes from: It comes from man. There are no sinning angels operating in the world today.
There is no such thing as "the devil made me do it."
 
Back
Top