• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

Romans 4 vs James 2: Newborn babes vs converted Christians

Proverbs 26:17~He that passeth by, and meddleth with strife belonging not to him, is like one that taketh a dog by the ears.​

Do you have difficulty reading normal font size?
 
Last edited:
Nearly all of that is false. And it all derives from a faulty understanding of regeneration. Your view of regeneration leaves the one born again not having his sins forgiven.
Ad hominem noted. I'm ignorant so you're correct. Got it.
All those who responded according to Acts 2:38 were unregenerate. Their regeneration came as a result of following Peter's command given in that verse.
Argumentum ad nauseam
But of course, you don't understand that. Or rather, you refuse to accept that.
More ad hominem



The opportunity to clarify your claim denying synergistic causality availed itself and you just blatantly ignored it in favor of the dross above. Would you now please answer the questions asked?


Now, this could be cleared up a great deal if you would answer each of the following questions with an immediate, direct, unqualified yes or no.

  1. Does God cause the hearing?
  2. Is the listening caused by God?
  3. Is the understanding of what the unregenerate sinner has heard caused by God?
  4. Does God cause the believing?
  5. Does God cause the repenting?
  6. Does God cause the receiving?
  7. Does the baptism occur prior to regeneration?

Succinct, direct, immediate yes or no answers is all that is asked of you at this time.
 
Last edited:
nt
 
Last edited:
You do. You either haven't thought it through sufficiently, or you haven't acknowledged the causality to yourself.
Some of that ad hominem that you so object to from others?
 
However, I feel compelled to make it clear that I do not believe in "synergistic causation". I do not believe we play any part in our salvation other than hearing, believing, repenting, and being baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. In doing that I have not in any way been a cause for salvation. The cause is fully, and only, God. In all of that I have only listened to God's promises.
You contradict yourself when you say "I do not believe we play any part of our salvation, other than---" You say you can do the hearing, believing and repenting apart from God. And not only that, that you must do so and then and only then will he condescend to rebirth you into his kingdom. That is not only synergism, it is also works done by you as the first cause of salvation and not grace. The person and work of Jesus wouldn't be actually accomplishing anything but only facilitating it.
Act 2:39 For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself." 40 And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, "Save yourselves from this crooked generation." 41 So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.
When you read that and highlighted what you though appropriate as support for your very own doctrine, did you miss the most important part? Or did you ignore it on purpose, pushing it into the background by your red letters? everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.
 
When you read that and highlighted what you though appropriate as support for your very own doctrine, did you miss the most important part? Or did you ignore it on purpose, pushing it into the background by your red letters? everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.
Do you know whom the Lord our God calls to Himself? Do you know how the Lord our God calls those to Himself? Could you post the scriptures to support your answers?
 
Some of that ad hominem that you so object to from others?
Tu Quoque


Still dodging Post #217's inquiries. They are valid questions based on what is stated in Post #213; directly related to the claim of not subscribing to a synergistically causal salvation.

  1. Does God cause the hearing?
  2. Is the listening caused by God?
  3. Is the understanding of what the unregenerate sinner has heard caused by God?
  4. Does God cause the believing?
  5. Does God cause the repenting?
  6. Does God cause the receiving?
  7. Does the baptism occur prior to regeneration?

Are you going to answer the questions asked or not?
 
Last edited:
Do you know whom the Lord our God calls to Himself?
Yes
Do you know how the Lord our God calls those to Himself?
Yes
Could you post the scriptures to support your answers?
Yes


How about providing some parity?

  1. Does God cause the hearing?
  2. Is the listening caused by God?
  3. Is the understanding of what the unregenerate sinner has heard caused by God?
  4. Does God cause the believing?
  5. Does God cause the repenting?
  6. Does God cause the receiving?
  7. Does the baptism occur prior to regeneration?

?
 
Tu Quoque


Still dodging Post #217's inquiries. They are valid questions based on what is stated in Post #213; directly related to the claim of not subscribing to a synergistically causal salvation.

  1. Does God cause the hearing?
  2. Is the listening caused by God?
  3. Is the understanding of what the unregenerate sinner has heard caused by God?
  4. Does God cause the believing?
  5. Does God cause the repenting?
  6. Does God cause the receiving?
  7. Does the baptism occur prior to regeneration?

Are you going to answer the questions asked or not?
Why should I? What difference would it make? Given your reply #217 to me, you will just reject or deny whatever I say.
 
A temple of stone is nothing like the temple of regenerate believers. The former is dead and lifeless, built by human hands. The latter is living and alive and built by God.
Well said, that's the first time I have heard it put that way.
The priests to which Jesus sent those he healed, and the sacrifices he directed them to perform do not have any comparison with post-Calvary and post-Pentecost conditions.

Sure it does.

Malachi 2:7

“For the priest's lips should keep knowledge, and they should seek the law at his mouth: for he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts.”

Nehemiah 8:1-8~"And all the people gathered themselves together as one man into the street that was before the water gate; and they spake unto Ezra the scribe to bring the book of the law of Moses, which the LORD had commanded to Israel. And Ezra the priest brought the law before the congregation both of men and women, and all that could hear with understanding, upon the first day of the seventh month. And he read therein before the street that was before the water gate from the morning until midday, before the men and the women, and those that could understand; and the ears of all the people were attentive unto the book of the law. And Ezra the scribe stood upon a pulpit of wood, which they had made for the purpose; and beside him stood Mattithiah, and Shema, and Anaiah, and Urijah, and Hilkiah, and Maaseiah, on his right hand; and on his left hand, Pedaiah, and Mishael, and Malchiah, and Hashum, and Hashbadana, Zechariah, and Meshullam. And Ezra opened the book in the sight of all the people; (for he was above all the people;) and when he opened it, all the people stood up: And Ezra blessed the LORD, the great God. And all the people answered, Amen, Amen, with lifting up their hands: and they bowed their heads, and worshipped the LORD with their faces to the ground. Also Jeshua, and Bani, and Sherebiah, Jamin, Akkub, Shabbethai, Hodijah, Maaseiah, Kelita, Azariah, Jozabad, Hanan, Pelaiah, and the Levites, caused the people to understand the law: and the people stood in their place. So they read in the book in the law of God distinctly, and gave the sense, and caused them to understand the reading.
 
Last edited:
Do you know whom the Lord our God calls to Himself?
I don't know who they are, but I know they are referred to as the elect and the called and the chosen.
Do you know how the Lord our God calls those to Himself?
He sends the Holy Spirit to give them a new birth into the Son. He opens their ears to hear the voice of the shepherd, to understand, and gives them faith.
Could you post the scriptures to support your answers?
Yes.
2 Tim 1:8-10 Therefore do not be ashamed of the testimony about our Lord, nor of me-- his prisoner, but share in suffering for the gospel by the power of God, who saved us and called us to a holy calling, not because of our works but because of his own purpose and grace, which he gave us in Christ Jesus before the ages began, and which now has been manifested through the appearing of our Savior Christ Jesus----

Romans 8:28 And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.

Matt 22:14 For many are called, but few are chosen.

Gal 1:15 But when he who had set me apart before I was born and who called me by his grace, was pleased to reveal his Son to me, in order that I might preach him among the Gentiles----

2 Thess 2:14 To this he called you through our gospel, so that you may obtain the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Romans 1:6 Including you who are called to belong to Jesus Christ,

1 Thess 5:24 He who calls you is faithful; he will surely do it.

John 3: 3 Jesus answered him, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.

John 10:25-30 Jesus answered them, "I told you, and you do not believe, The works that I do in my Father's name bear witness about me, but you do not believe because you are not among my sheep. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father's hand. I and the Father are one."

Acts 13:48 When the Gentiles heard this, they were glad and honored the word of the Lord; and all who were appointed for eternal life believed.

Eph 2 By grace you have been saved through faith, and that is a gift of God---



Need more?
 
He sends the Holy Spirit to give them a new birth into the Son. He opens their ears to hear the voice of the shepherd, to understand, and gives them faith.
.
.
.
Matt 22:14 For many are called, but few are chosen.
So for some He opens their ears to hear the voice of the shepherd, to understand, and gives them faith but doesn't necessarily choose them. That is an interesting bit of theology. How does that work, exactly? What happens to those with faith, those who believe in God, that are not chosen?
 
Why should I? What difference would it make? Given your reply #217 to me, you will just reject or deny whatever I say.
What difference would answering the questions asked make?

  1. It would prove the claim your position is not synergistically causal, as was claimed.
  2. It would prove me wrong, and I'll adjust my posts accordingly in the future.
  3. It demonstrates an ability on your part to engage your own viewpoint instead of being avoidant.
  4. It's much more rational than the fallacies already posted.
  5. It moves the conversation forward.
  6. It provides information you, me, and everyone else can rely upon and refer to.
  7. It removes speculation and biased attribution.
  8. It's polite and respectful.


That is why.


  1. Does God cause the hearing?
  2. Is the listening caused by God?
  3. Is the understanding of what the unregenerate sinner has heard caused by God?
  4. Does God cause the believing?
  5. Does God cause the repenting?
  6. Does God cause the receiving?
  7. Does the baptism occur prior to regeneration?


I await your answers.
 
I will use your tactic here.
Red herring. I haven't used any "tactic," and this is demonstrably provable. I just answer the questions asked, and I did so immediately, directly, and succinctly...... as every poster should if the desire is to have an honest conversation with parity that moves the discussion forward. After four or five exchanges I'm still waiting on answers to questions first asked back in Post #217. By any objective measure my supposed "tactic" is much more effective than the avoidance and fallacy contained in the last several posts I've received. I defy you to find an occasion where it took me that long to answer ANY question I've ever been asked.
No you don't
Yeah, I do.
No you don't
Yeah, I do.
But you didn't
No one was asked to post the verses. All that was asked was could they be posted. The answer to that question is, yes, I could post verses supporting my claim to know how the Lord our God calls those to Himself. When treated with multiple avoidant posts, I do not presume more than was asked for is wanted. I answered the question asked and it is completely disingenuous to imply I didn't. If posting the verses was wanted, then an additional request should have been posted! That lapse is not on me.

  • Could you post the scriptures to support your answers?
  • Would you please do so?



I will gladly post supporting verses if and when the questions I asked you more than twenty posts ago are answered.

  1. Does God cause the hearing?
  2. Is the listening caused by God?
  3. Is the understanding of what the unregenerate sinner has heard caused by God?
  4. Does God cause the believing?
  5. Does God cause the repenting?
  6. Does God cause the receiving?
  7. Does the baptism occur prior to regeneration?


Just answer the questions asked, as asked, and help move the conversation forward.
 
Well said, that's the first time I have heard it put that way.
I have my moments ;).
Sure it does
The entire book of Hebrews proves otherwise. The Levitical priesthood was replaced with a more superior order, the priests in the order of Melchizedek. Furthermore, God never wanted the priesthood divided apart from civil leadership. We see that first in Melchizedek, the man who was both priest and king. We see that in God's request Moses go and be both the religious and civil leader of God's people and it is only because Moses balked that the two were divided. God reunified the roles in the Judges. All of it was prophetic messianically speaking. Jesus is both Priest and King. We, the converts to Christ are royal priests in the Order of Mel, not Levitical priests who are not kings of the nation.

So, no, it does not. The comparison is a false equivalence.
 
.
.
.

So for some He opens their ears to hear the voice of the shepherd, to understand, and gives them faith but doesn't necessarily choose them. That is an interesting bit of theology. How does that work, exactly? What happens to those with faith, those who believe in God, that are not chosen?
There were ten other passages of Scripture that I used to support what you asked me to support with Scripture. Why do you only bring up one of them and then not actually respond to it but begin arguing about it by asking me some more questions. Do you not see what everyone else sees when you constantly do this? It is evidence that you cannot dispute what is presented to you at all.

So, this is the scripture you have chosen to acknowledge is there in my post.

Matt 22:14 Many are called but few are chosen.

Many are called refers to the gospel being preached. It is not withheld from any types or groups of people. It goes out to the whole world, and in order to believe something it must first be heard. But that does not mean that all who hear it will believe it. Those chosen by God will hear and believe. There are none who have faith and who believe the gospel (same thing) except the chosen. He does not open the ears to hear the voice of the Shepherd if they are not of his sheep. He does not give them faith or understanding. He leaves them where they are and want to be.

You can rant all you want about that, retracing your paths according to what you have already reiterated countless times. But I am not going to respond to any of it until you first address the other ten passages I gave as support for what you asked me to support. If you don't it is because you can't and it fools no one.
 
  1. Does the baptism occur prior to regeneration?
Baptism is the occasion, the point in the time of the life of the repentant believer when he is regenerated. So no, baptism does not occur prior to regeneration. It is the instant when regeneration occurs.
 
Back
Top