• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

Kirk Cameron Rejects Eternal Conscious Torment, Embraces Conditional Immortality

Turns out annihilation does have a conceptual/semantic meaning: complete destruction or obliteration.

Perhaps you simply framed your statement in a way that is philosophically confused. As it stands it equivocates between conceptual meaning and experiential content.

Did you mean annihilation cannot be experienced or describe, because non-existence has no subject to experience, therefore annihilation is "meaningless"?
I was making a joke. But, that is a point of truth. Since we have no shared experience of annihilation/obliteration/non-existence, we cannot comprehend it. Is it dark? Is it painful? Is it cold? Does it taste like chicken? Does it have a flavor? It is an existential question that has no answer, because the definition of annihilation ends in non-existence.
 
Back
Top