You kinda ask the right 'question' in your feeble attempt to understand it with a carnal mind. But the question has been asked by more informed minds: How can a Righteous God create an unrighteous being? This would bring into question the integrity of God. But God cannot reduplicate Himself in Himself. This is impossible for there is only ONE God, there is NONE like Him, and He gives His glory to NO ONE.
You kind of ask the wrong question with a carnal mind. God did not create an unrighteous being. It has nothing to do with God's glory, but Lucifer's and mankinds rebellion against God. Lucifer didn't seek God's glory, he sought to be as god, that is He sought to dethrone God and be God Himself. However, God created mankind in His image. As such, man is the image of God, though finite and temporal. We see dim reflections of God in what God made. We can create, though finite, and from what has already been created by God. We can design, though again, finite, and within the confines of what exists. (Again, we cannot design or make from nothing.) We can reason, though within the finite expanse of creation, and within our own fallibility. (Our own, not His, since He is not fallible.)
Now, apply this truth to the creation of man. Did God reduplicate Himself in created matter? Did God reduplicate any aspect of His Nature or Deific Attributes in created matter: man? The answer is "No."
God did duplicate aspects of His nature in man. However, it is but a dim reflection. Not deity, but His nature. Why do you keep saying God lied when it says He created man in His image? It is not that we look like Him, but that our nature is a pale reflection of His own. We can reason. We can create (make being a better description). We can design. We can do all kinds of things that God can do, but we can only do it to a much much less degree. When God was done creating, He looked and said that it was good. Since when was sin considered good?
God cannot create or recreate Himself in matter. He cannot transfer or copy any part of His Deific Nature or Person in Matter. Why not?
Because there is only ONE God.
He didn't create God. He created man, and made man in His image. A pale reflection of that which is found in God, but not that which makes God God.
Did Adam or the woman possess any Deific Attributes or Nature of God?
She had some of the nature of God, but that which was a reflection of man, since woman was taken from man.
The answer would have to be "No."
This means that man was created "FALLEN SHORT" of the glory of God, or the glory that is God. The word for this is "sin."
Except that isn't how it is at all. Man was created sinless, though God purposed for whatever reason, that man would sin, and God would redeem. It is beyond our capability to understand His purpose in it, but dimly. (For His glory, obviously, but there is much more to it then we can hope to comprehend/understand)
ibid.
The angels that sinned are locked up.
Angels sin no more.
4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment; 2 Peter 2:4.
As can be seen here, there sin was no action of God. It was their action. They sinned.
And this took place before God created man. I put it between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2.
Actually, if you continue reading you would find that it was in the days prior to Noah, and it was the reason why God sent the flood in the first place. However, you would only know that if you read the other passages in scripture dealing with this.
And there are not two ways of temptation. Only one:
I said there were three categories of sin. The lust of the eyes, the lust of the flesh, and the one I didn't word properly, the boastful pride of life. You can find this in John's epistles, since he states it.
14 But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. James 1:13–14.
Yes, but those temptations are going to be in the realm of the lust of the eyes, the lust of the flesh, and/or the boastful pride of life.
You are right. You said: "The lust of the eyes, the lust of the flesh, and the pride of life. Jesus tests. The lust of the flesh. You are hungry. Why wait on God? You can make food right here and be satisfied. Turn the rocks to bread and eat. Satisfy yourself. The lust of the eyes. Look at the whole world that is before you. All of this is mine. It can be yours. You can have all of this that you can see, and you don't have to suffer to get it. You don't have to go through the pain of this life," all this has to do with the flesh. Jesus was both God and Man. And since God cannot be tempted with anything it was the human part of the God-Man that was tested, not the Deity.
Yes, it was the human part that was tested. I fully agree. The humanity was in full communion with the deity (the two natures in perfect communion/fellowship) and thus the flesh overcame the temptation through the Word of God.
46 For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me.
47 But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words? Jn 5:45–47.
To the Jew or Gentile, it doesn't matter.
IF you do not believe Moses (Torah) then you won't believe Jesus.
THAT is the bottom line.
Sort of. The point was that Moses prophesied of Christ, so if they didn't listen to Moses, they wouldn't understand/know/recognize Him.