It works most obviously to spiritualize the plain understanding of Christ's prophecy, into something else more symbolic than is written.
It's called making fables out of sure prophecy of Scripture.
I'm not here to defend any man 's teaching that has come before in this thread ~ everyman stands or falls upon his own understanding, so whatever is written in this post is strictly between you and me.
So, by your statement above, do you reject applying a spiritual meaning to all scriptures, or most, or some. Could you answer this question, so I know exactly what you do believe and teach? Simple question, and I want a direct and simple answer please.
Would you accuse Christ of preaching fables with this quote of him:
Was Jesus understanding the prophecy that was written by the prophets, or, was he deceived, and deceiving others?
He applied the true sense to the words of the Prophets, which few are able to do. John the Baptist came
with the same spirit and power that Elijah had when he was on the earth. Elijah will
never come in person again until he comes at the last day with Christ and with all other saints that have ever lived in this world. (Another study for another day)
When reading Revelation we
must use other scriptures to understand
the highly symbolically language used by John in order to give the writings of the book Revelation its true biblical teaching, or else it would be impossible to come to the knowledge of the truth contained therein.
We approach all scriptures at face value, and from there, we seek its true meaning by using others scriptures which are very clear in its teaching. We let other scriptures interpret Revelation for us, we do not let Revelation interpret others clear cut scriptures.
A thousand years is not as a thousand years. It is a thousand years.
It all depends on how it is use~God's word is its own dictionary on how the Spirit uses His word.
Example: Bread~is it a liquid substance we eat, or is it used as the word of God? Something all of God's children need to grown thereby? It could be either, all depends on its context and the way it is used.
Israel: Is it Abraham's natural children, or the children of God's promises? It could be either, all depends on the context in which Israel is used in. So many more could be given to prove God's word is its own dictionary, for the most part.
When we study scripture we will find that God often uses certain number relationships to signify things. For example the number 3 for the purpose or will of God, as in the 3 times Christ prayed, the 3 times the sheet was let down and God said kill and eat, the 3 times Paul sought the Lord that the thorn in the flesh would be removed from him, the 3 times God came seeking fruit on the fig tree, or the 3 days till the Temple was raised up, etc., etc. Likewise, the number 12 representing the congregation, as in the 12 stars, the 12 tribes of Israel, the 12 Apostles, the 12 gates of the city, etc., or the number 7 and it's multiples, 70, 700, 7000 as the "Totality" of whatever is in view.
And in this same way the number 10, 100, 1000 is likewise used in a spiritual sense to signifies the fullness of whatever is being spoken about. As an example, as you might say to your wife, "
I'll love you for a thousand years". You're not literally putting a number on the time, rather, you're expressing the "fullness" of your Love for her. The 1000 is a symbolic length of time to indicate you'll love her from now till the fullness of time. Whatever that time may literally be, whether it be 10 years, 30 years 63 years, whatever it may be is symbolized by the use of the term a thousand years.
And God uses this number in that way in scripture. We can see in the Psalms where the Lord God uses it to signify the fullness of hills:
Psalms 50:10-11
- "For Every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a Thousand hills.
- I know All the fowls of the mountains: and the wild beasts of the field are mine."
Is that to illustrate a literal number of hills hold his cattle? Does that mean that the cattle upon 1001 hills, or the cattle upon 1002 hills are not His?
No, and so quite obviously the number thousand here is not a number to be understood literally. I
t's a number that God used here to illustrate the fullness. When we read the verse carefully we see "every" beast of the forest is His. Consider what God is doing here. All the cattle are his! God is using the term 1000 to show us this.
But we have to have our eyes open to see it. Nothing is in the Bible by accident. The 1000 cattle indicates the fullness of cattle are His. All of them are the Lord's. Not just those on 1000 hills. Likewise, Isaiah chapter 7 speaks about the first advent of the Lord (verse 14), and continues:
Isaiah 7:23
- "And it shall come to pass in THAT DAY, that every place shall be, where there were a thousand vines at a thousand silverlings, it shall even be for briers and thorns. With arrows and with bows shall men come hither; because All the land shall become briers and thorns."
Are we to suppose that this is a literal number. Were there literally 1000 vines and literally 1000 silver coins, not 1001 or 999? When we look at the verse carefully we see that it is indicating that where there was the fullness of vines, there will be briers and thorns. The 1000 is not to alert us to a literal number of vines, or the literal number of 1000 silverlings (
pieces of silver money), No, it is to illustrate where the fullness of vines once were, and where the fullness of money was, it is Changed to briers & thorns or worthlessness. In other words, it's become bankrupt! God is talking about a "full" destruction. That's what the 1000 illustrates. The fullness of what was there, is made briers and thorns. and that is made clear by God as it then says "because
All the land shall become briers and thorns." You see,m that's what the number 1000 illustrated. the Fulness. Again when we look at a verse such as Psalms 105, we read,
Psalms 105:8
- "He hath remembered His covenant Forever, the word which He commanded to a Thousand generations. Which covenant He made with Abraham, and His oath unto Isaac;"
The LORD hath remembered His Covenant, how long? Forever! And the Word which He commanded to 1000 generations. Is This Literal? Is His Word only commanded to literally 1000 generations and not 1001 or 1002? Is His Word not commanded to the generations after 1000? Of course it is. God would not suddenly break His covenant in the 1001st generation of those who remain faithful to Him. One thousand has to be understood figuratively here, not literally. Again, look at the context of the verse. His Covenant is remembered forever. And His Word commanded to 1000 generations! Context tells us that this 1000 generations is "the Fullness or completeness" of all generations. That's how long it is remembered. Always! And it is remembered by the messenger of the Covenant Christ, send down from heaven. The number 1000 has been put there by God to show us a certain consistency in His use of this number symbolically.
Deuteronomy 7:9
- "know therefore that the Lord Thy God, He is God, the faithful God, which keepeth the Covenant and mercy with them that love Him and keep His commandments to a thousand generations".
In light of this scripture, how can anyone say a thousand is always understood literally? Do we keep His commandments to a thousand generations, or do we keep them always in Christ?
The 1000 is Symbolic of the Fullness. In Revelations chapter 20 where the context is symbolic language, the 1000 years that Satan is bound is symbolic language also.
It indicates the fullness of time. In other words, from the time that he is bound by Christ at the cross, to the time that he is loosed,
is the fullness of time which God prescribes. Till the time when the fulness of the nations or gentiles be come in, and the Church be fulfilled.
Whatever literal amount of time it may actually be is not for us to know.
Later....RB