• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

Theology Question For Calvinist/Reformed Members

Beyond repeating what I have already posted I am now sure how to make it any clearer. All creatures the Creator created are created for His use, and His use alone. That holds true for the sinless creatures He first made all, the sinful creatures He knew would ensue, and the elect that would be changed. Thinking "before" and "after" is misguided.
Although I like Paternal Traducianism, there is no escaping the fact HE is the Potter and we are the Clay. As usual, both sides have points; or sides wouldn't exist...

Yea, Compatibalism! @Arial
 
Last edited:
It is appointed in dying that mankind die once , No retrial or double jeopardy Scripture is the "book of law" the living tol for judging . It not only contains law But is God's tool under judgment of death never to rise.
Deuteronomy 31:25-27King James Version That Moses commanded the Levites, which bare the ark of the covenant of the Lord, saying, Take this book of the law, and put it in the side of the ark of the covenant of the Lord your God, that it may be there for a witness against thee. For I know thy rebellion, and thy stiff neck: behold, while I am yet alive with you this day, ye have been rebellious against the Lord; and how much more after my death?
It will not be part of the new promised order. The death of death.
The death of death is the death of mortality, in the immortality of the resurrection.
Death the suffering of hell on earth will be tossed in the fiery of God judgment called a lake.
Death is the loss of natural life, which separates the spirit/soul from its body, where the spirit/soul is in a condition unnatural to itself and longs to be united with its body again (2 Co 5:1-9).
 
He creates an evil against evil doer Sometimes punishing another nation for sin with another sinful nation . God does not promote sin.
Or simply uses an existing evil, punishing sin with sin.
 
Yes we are saved by the fullness of His grace the whole cost of salvation through the faith of Christ . Christ's labor of love .You could say a creative love.

The law "Let there be"and its testimony . . . "mankind was good"

Adam and Eve violated the letter of the law
Keeping in mind that "letter" and "law" are the same thing; i.e., the written code.
There was no letter (written code) of the law in the Garden.
by obeying the voice of a stranger and lusting after its beauty. God cut off the legs of the serpent .He does not have a leg to stand on .

Can't separate faith from works the reward grace . Again no faith no voice as working testimony. If there is no "let there faithfully be " Nothing changes nothing .

Remember we are reckoned as no faith, no power

His faith is powerful.

Faith is a living work of God not a work of our own. . we are his workmanship not formed by human hands.

Hebrews 11: 6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.

He rewards us with the amount needed to pay the full wage of sin .No more, no less.
 
Keeping in mind that "letter" and "law" are the same thing; i.e., the written code.
There was no letter (written code) of the law in the Garden.
The letter of the law are the words seen written by the finger of God. . . scripture

One third of human history had passed before God moved Moses to confirm , According to the witten code it was binding when he before. trut

Genesis 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
 
The letter of the law are the words seen written by the finger of God. . . scripture

One third of human history had passed before God moved Moses to confirm , According to the witten code it was binding when he before. trut

Genesis 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
There was no written Scripture in the Garden, no letter of the law in the Garden.
 
Although I like Paternal Traducianism, there is no escaping the fact HE is the Potter and we are the Clay. As usual, both sides have points; or sides wouldn't exist...

Yea, Compatibalism! @Arial
Yes, but not all compatibilism are equal. God decided the beginning before the beginning began. He has decided the outcome(s), and the outcome was decided before the beginning began. Whatever else happens in between it all conspires to conclude one way and only one way.
 
Although I like Paternal Traducianism, there is no escaping the fact HE is the Potter and we are the Clay. As usual, both sides have points; or sides wouldn't exist...

Yea, Compatibalism! @Arial

Yes, but not all compatibilism are equal. God decided the beginning before the beginning began. He has decided the outcome(s), and the outcome was decided before the beginning began. Whatever else happens in between it all conspires to conclude one way and only one way.

And I will add this: the idea God knows and decided the one single beginning and the end but does already know and one way or another decided what happens in between is irrational. God brought about a bunch of stuff about which He is ignorant and cannot know until the sin-filled creature tells Him is wack.
 
And I will add this: the idea God knows and decided the one single beginning and the end but does already know and one way or another decided what happens in between is irrational. God brought about a bunch of stuff about which He is ignorant and cannot know until the sin-filled creature tells Him is wack.
God MAKES vessels of Honor and Dishonor from the same Lump of Clay. This means that God MAKES/creates each individual...
 
Last edited:
God MAKES vessels of Honor and Dishonor from the same Lump of Clay. This means that God MAKES/creates each individual...
The angel is in the details so a slight amendment to that statement is warranted: God makes vessels FOR honor and dishonor (Rom. 9; 2 Tim. 2), for honorable and dishonorable use.... and to diverse ends.

We just happen to be reading about the story while it is happening thinking we can figure out what happened outside of creation from within creation. Kinda like the fish telling its owner what existence outside the fishbowl is all about.

Ecclesiastes 3:11
He has made everything appropriate in its time. He has also set eternity in their heart, without the possibility that mankind will find out the work which God has done from the beginning even to the end.
 
Last edited:
The angel is in the details so a slight amendment to that statement is warranted: God makes vessels FOR honor and dishonor (Rom. 9; 2 Tim. 2), for honorable and dishonorable use.... and to diverse ends.
I would offer the word is messenger not angel(a fake word) How beautiful are the feet of a apostle sent by God shod with the gospel of peace.
 
Exactly room to wiggle
Is there room to wiggle in the Trinity?

Deu 6:4 - Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:

Or

Hear O Israel: JEHOVAH, The plural God; is One LORD...


Now THAT'S Compatibalism...
 
Last edited:
Beyond repeating what I have already posted I am now sure how to make it any clearer. All creatures the Creator created are created for His use, and His use alone. That holds true for the sinless creatures He first made all, the sinful creatures He knew would ensue, and the elect that would be changed. Thinking "before" and "after" is misguided.
Your last sentence, in context, of course, is my very point. The notions, "before" and "after" are necessary for the human mind to arrange thoughts, but do not quite reflect reality. I arrange from what seems to me logical concerning God —Simplicity, Aseity and so on— which imply that God spoke the finished product into existence from the beginning. But to say it that way, I realize, is to once again introduce "before" and "after". Yet, if I am to talk about what I mean, that this temporal is but a vapor compared to the solid reality of the eternal, it would be silly to emphasize the "during" over the "before"—and the work of creatures over that of the Creator.
 
Your last sentence, in context, of course, is my very point. The notions, "before" and "after" are necessary for the human mind to arrange thoughts, but do not quite reflect reality.
Yep.

However....

I wonder if "our reality" is exactly what is intended. As a Reformation-minded believer I am obligated to be consistent and if God decided all things or, as the WCF puts it, "ordained all things from eternity," then the various "realities" is purposeful. Despite (or perhaps because of) my deliberations on the matter I cannot fathom a way out of the fact the heavens and the earth are separated and separated in many ways (beginning with the opening line of scripture) while also connected and/or overlapping. The angels, at least temporarily, have faculties we do not possess and we, conversely have faculties they do not possess, and we will yet have faculties that eclipse the current heavenly host when we find ourselves among them. To the degree knowledge and experience inform and define "reality," then there are multiple realities, and that diversity stands apart from the diversity established by physics (or what we call "physics").

The one exception to these rules is sin. Sin mucks up everything, including our perceptions and our perceptions of our perceptions.

In the Trinitarian pov Jesus is both God and human. So Jesus can be understood to command creation simply because he is divine and possesses the faculties of the Creator. BUT Jesus is also the perfect male human unadulterated by sin. He, therefore, also commands creation, down to its base elements if he so chooses, simply because he is a good, sinless, unashamed human able to walk in the authority and power given humanity in its created state.

Genesis 1:27-30
God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. God blessed them; and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over every living thing that moves on the earth." Then God said, "Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the surface of all the earth, and every tree which has fruit yielding seed; it shall be food for you; and to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the sky and to every thing that moves on the earth which has life, I have given every green plant for food"; and it was so.

So when we see Jesus commanding the wind we naturally (no pun intended) understand he does so with divine might and authority BUT we should also understand he does so because he has been given the ability to rule over and subdue the earth, all the plants and animals are his to command as a human made in God's image. When he spits on dirt and makes a blindness-healing mud he does so as someone human bending the earth to do his will. He alone can do this but it is our destiny.

It's also the correct reality we're supposed to know and inhabit.

Angels cannot do that. Whatever faculties the angels possess in their created state is likewise compromised and corrupted by their sin when they disobey the created order.

God exists external to ALL of it.

Multiple realities, not just God and not-God.
I arrange from what seems to me logical concerning God — Simplicity, Aseity and so on— which imply that God spoke the finished product into existence from the beginning. But to say it that way, I realize, is to once again introduce "before" and "after".
Yep. It's very difficult to acquire and sustain an "IS" mindset.
Yet, if I am to talk about what I mean, that this temporal is but a vapor compared to the solid reality of the eternal, it would be silly to emphasize the "during" over the "before"—and the work of creatures over that of the Creator.
Sorta.

I read scripture to say the "heavens and the earth" are going to be around a very long time. Billions of years. The last chapters of the Bible are about the "new" city of peace (jeru=city; salem=peace) coming down out of heaven to earth. The earth is not destroyed. The externally existent God and Son dwell on the earth in ways we do not currently fathom. The earth is not permanently destroyed at the end of scripture. The great judgment in which the adversary and death itself are destroyed is not the end of creation, the end of the earth. It appears previously existing divisions between the heavens and the earth implicit in Genesis 1:1 forward are changed.

Yet it is still inside time and space.

I conclude our understanding of "temporal" will, therefore, change...... and some greater degree of the eternal "is" is obtained. Perhaps we'll finally understand all ten or eleven of creation's dimensions and possess the knowledge, understanding and wisdom to use them for God's purpose(s). We barely grasp four dimensions now. If this is true then our current understanding of "before" and "after" will change; old way rendered childish or amateurish, if not meaningless.

We'll understand the true Jesus, not a mythologized figure, but one who simply operated the vehicle the way he designed it to operate. The truth of the Creator as Creator will be understood and the meaning (and absurdity) of God asking Job if he knows how to make a bird will bring mirth.


It's a secular book, but I strongly recommend giving Michio Kaku's book, "Hyperspace" a read. It's an amazingly accessible exposition on the history and nature (again, no pun intended) of field theories, and when read thorough the Christian mindset it's both illuminating and fun. Unblessedly, with his increased popularity some of his books pander to politics and social commentary. His book, "The God Equation" is a waste of paper. When he sticks to physics then he is at his best and there is much Christians can learn from learning the basics of field theory. More germane to your point, when we understand how it is something can be in two places at once or two times at once scripture won't lose its amazingness (as the antitheists would have us believe). Creation and the scriptures describing and explaining Christ in creation will be more amazing, not less.
 
Yep.

However....

I wonder if "our reality" is exactly what is intended. As a Reformation-minded believer I am obligated to be consistent and if God decided all things or, as the WCF puts it, "ordained all things from eternity," then the various "realities" is purposeful.
Yes, there is necessarily (I think) something to that. The perceptions, or points-of-view, were also ordained by God. But I think you meant more than that. There is a weird mention, in several places in Scripture, of the authority of the human, and particularly, I think, of the believer, over creation.
Despite (or perhaps because of) my deliberations on the matter I cannot fathom a way out of the fact the heavens and the earth are separated and separated in many ways (beginning with the opening line of scripture) while also connected and/or overlapping. The angels, at least temporarily, have faculties we do not possess and we, conversely have faculties they do not possess, and we will yet have faculties that eclipse the current heavenly host when we find ourselves among them. To the degree knowledge and experience inform and define "reality," then there are multiple realities, and that diversity stands apart from the diversity established by physics (or what we call "physics").
I'm not sure if you are talking here of physical separation, philosophical separation, logical separation, rhetorically, physical vs. metaphysical (natural vs supernatural) or what. Though, at least from a human perspective, I have to agree there is something to all those. Yet I can't neglect to mention that what is seen is the smallest component of reality, or, at least, of what is eternal. God's going to bust this wide open!
The one exception to these rules is sin. Sin mucks up everything, including our perceptions and our perceptions of our perceptions.
Ha! Yes, agreed completely! And he planned this to be, also, to include his forbearance of our foolishness, at his expense!
In the Trinitarian pov Jesus is both God and human. So Jesus can be understood to command creation simply because he is divine and possesses the faculties of the Creator. BUT Jesus is also the perfect male human unadulterated by sin. He, therefore, also commands creation, down to its base elements if he so chooses, simply because he is a good, sinless, unashamed human able to walk in the authority and power given humanity in its created state.
I usually temper these notions with the fact that Jesus accomplished everything he did, not by his own power, but by the Father's power. Yet, I'm the one who mentions plays on words in scripture, plays on plays, plays on concepts: I say that Jesus proved that he was God by his obedience, doing something that God alone can do, living without sin. Yet that unity of Jesus with the Father may be descriptive (John 17-ishly) of how that authority given humans actually works. I don't know. I can only suspect that it has something to do with it.
Genesis 1:27-30
God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. God blessed them; and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over every living thing that moves on the earth." Then God said, "Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the surface of all the earth, and every tree which has fruit yielding seed; it shall be food for you; and to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the sky and to every thing that moves on the earth which has life, I have given every green plant for food"; and it was so.

So when we see Jesus commanding the wind we naturally (no pun intended) understand he does so with divine might and authority BUT we should also understand he does so because he has been given the ability to rule over and subdue the earth, all the plants and animals are his to command as a human made in God's image. When he spits on dirt and makes a blindness-healing mud he does so as someone human bending the earth to do his will. He alone can do this but it is our destiny.

It's also the correct reality we're supposed to know and inhabit.

Angels cannot do that. Whatever faculties the angels possess in their created state is likewise compromised and corrupted by their sin when they disobey the created order.
Good thoughts. —And for which it is difficult to build a container.
God exists external to ALL of it.
And yet, for any truth to our mental frameworks, he is immanent to all of it
Multiple realities, not just God and not-God.

Yep. It's very difficult to acquire and sustain an "IS" mindset.
Too, for me, at least, it is difficult to not be skeptical of my framework for 'what is'.
Sorta.

I read scripture to say the "heavens and the earth" are going to be around a very long time. Billions of years. The last chapters of the Bible are about the "new" city of peace (jeru=city; salem=peace) coming down out of heaven to earth. The earth is not destroyed. The externally existent God and Son dwell on the earth in ways we do not currently fathom. The earth is not permanently destroyed at the end of scripture. The great judgment in which the adversary and death itself are destroyed is not the end of creation, the end of the earth. It appears previously existing divisions between the heavens and the earth implicit in Genesis 1:1 forward are changed.

Yet it is still inside time and space.

I conclude our understanding of "temporal" will, therefore, change...... and some greater degree of the eternal "is" is obtained. Perhaps we'll finally understand all ten or eleven of creation's dimensions and possess the knowledge, understanding and wisdom to use them for God's purpose(s). We barely grasp four dimensions now. If this is true then our current understanding of "before" and "after" will change; old way rendered childish or amateurish, if not meaningless.
Very interesting. And I like that very much. For a long time now, I've thought that "in whom we live and move and have our being" is indeed a worthy notion, but my upbringing wants the universe, to include the earth, to undergo a change similar to our change when we are resurrected and glorified. The notion that it may be more a matter of perception than of mere purification or transformation is intriguing, but not easy to accept. But it does appeal to me from the perspective of just what 'existence', of the creature and of creation, really is, after all.
We'll understand the true Jesus, not a mythologized figure, but one who simply operated the vehicle the way he designed it to operate. The truth of the Creator as Creator will be understood and the meaning (and absurdity) of God asking Job if he knows how to make a bird will bring mirth.
Ha! Yes!
It's a secular book, but I strongly recommend giving Michio Kaku's book, "Hyperspace" a read. It's an amazingly accessible exposition on the history and nature (again, no pun intended) of field theories, and when read thorough the Christian mindset it's both illuminating and fun.
Thanks. Looked it up and ordered it.
Unblessedly, with his increased popularity some of his books pander to politics and social commentary. His book, "The God Equation" is a waste of paper. When he sticks to physics then he is at his best and there is much Christians can learn from learning the basics of field theory. More germane to your point, when we understand how it is something can be in two places at once or two times at once scripture won't lose its amazingness (as the antitheists would have us believe). Creation and the scriptures describing and explaining Christ in creation will be more amazing, not less.
This brings to mind what I mentioned above. The claim, which has for quite some time been around, that empirical reality can be observed to 'change'-as-a-result-of-human observation, is ironic, in that it seems relevant to the concept (?) of the authority of man. And that does not in the least deny that if there is anything to it, that it is still a result of our unity with God, and by the power of God, and, ironically for those who think it will deny Monergism in all things, it is raw fact that the Spirit goes where it will, and God can do anything he wants, to include be the only source of not only any virtue in a person, but also of any ability at all, of a person.

Good conversation. Thanks.
 
Picky, picky, picky. . . ;)

You are exactly right, I took some of the shine off it.
it should be perxacly.
Yes, but it looks prettier with the T in it. And more easily transposed in the mind.
 
Back
Top