Arch Stanton
Well Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2023
- Messages
- 1,228
- Reaction score
- 102
- Points
- 63
- Faith
- Catholic
- Politics
- Conservative
you defamed our character though... not very sportingStick to the topic.
@Arch Stanton and @donadams Please consider Luther's words.Here is another interesting part of history from Luther.
Luther, searching into the annals of the Church, he discovered that the supremacy of Rome had its origin in the ambition of one party and the credulous ignorance of another. Silence, as to these melancholy discoveries, was not permitted to him. The pride of his adversaries, - the victory they pretended to have gained, - their endeavors to put out the light, decided his purpose. He went foreward in the way wherein God led him, without disquieting himself as to the result to which it might lead him. Luther had marked this as the epoch of his enfranchisement from the papal yoke. "learn of me, "says he," how hard is it to unlearn the errors which the whole confirms by its example, and which, by long use, have become to us as second nature. I had for seven years read and hourly expounded the Scriptures with much zeal so that I knew almost all by heart. I had also all the firstfruits of the knowledge and faith of my Lord Jesus Christ; that is, I knew that we are justified and saved, not by works, but by faith in Christ; and I even openly maintained that it is not by divine right that the pope is chief of the Christian Church. And yet . . I could not see the conclusion from all this; namely, - that of nesessity and beyond doubt, the pope is of the devil. For what is not of God, must needs be of the devil. Luther adds, further on - I do not now give free utterance to my indignation against those who still adhere to the Pope. since I, who had for so many years read the Holy Scriptures with so much care, yet held to the Papacy with so much obstinacy.
I pray you RC's reading this will consider Luther's wrords here. Read them carefully as they are very important.
I read it... his words have as much authority as yours or mine....Here is another interesting part of history from Luther.
Luther, searching into the annals of the Church, he discovered that the supremacy of Rome had its origin in the ambition of one party and the credulous ignorance of another. Silence, as to these melancholy discoveries, was not permitted to him. The pride of his adversaries, - the victory they pretended to have gained, - their endeavors to put out the light, decided his purpose. He went foreward in the way wherein God led him, without disquieting himself as to the result to which it might lead him. Luther had marked this as the epoch of his enfranchisement from the papal yoke. "learn of me, "says he," how hard is it to unlearn the errors which the whole confirms by its example, and which, by long use, have become to us as second nature. I had for seven years read and hourly expounded the Scriptures with much zeal so that I knew almost all by heart. I had also all the firstfruits of the knowledge and faith of my Lord Jesus Christ; that is, I knew that we are justified and saved, not by works, but by faith in Christ; and I even openly maintained that it is not by divine right that the pope is chief of the Christian Church. And yet . . I could not see the conclusion from all this; namely, - that of nesessity and beyond doubt, the pope is of the devil. For what is not of God, must needs be of the devil. Luther adds, further on - I do not now give free utterance to my indignation against those who still adhere to the Pope. since I, who had for so many years read the Holy Scriptures with so much care, yet held to the Papacy with so much obstinacy.
I pray you RC's reading this will consider Luther's wrords here. Read them carefully as they are very important.
What do we do with this? Where is his proof of anything regarding this statement?searching into the annals of the Church, he discovered that the supremacy of Rome had its origin in the ambition of one party and the credulous ignorance of another.
Again, what shall we do with this statement? Where is his proof of anything here?I even openly maintained that it is not by divine right that the pope is chief of the Christian Church.
I'm just trying to help.I read it... his words have as much authority as yours or mine....
Do with it what you like Arch.What do we do with this? Where is his proof of anything regarding this statement?
Again, do with it what you like Arch.Again, what shall we do with this statement? Where is his proof of anything here?
Thanks
No proof was given regarding his 'research'. How are we supposed to be enlightened?I'm just trying to help.
Do with it what you like Arch.
Again, do with it what you like Arch.
Why do you think Luther mentions Peter as the representative of the one and only Church? [A brief explanation of the Creed; Works of Martin Luther vol. 2 - p.373]I'm just trying to help.
Do with it what you like Arch.
Again, do with it what you like Arch.
Why Arch?Why do you think Luther mentions Peter as the representative of the one and only Church? [A brief explanation of the Creed; Works of Martin Luther vol. 2 - p.373]
'In like manner He says, in Matthew xvi, to the one man Peter, who stands as the representative of the one and only Church.'
@Alive
The Catholic Church has faced accusations of murdering non-Catholics, particularly during the periods of the Inquisition. However, it's important to understand the context and the facts. The Inquisition, which began in 1184, was primarily established to address heresies like Catharism. There were different inquisitions, including the Medieval, Roman, and Spanish Inquisitions. The Spanish Inquisition, often cited for its severity, was a state institution aimed at identifying **conversos**—Jews and Muslims who pretended to convert to Christianity but secretly practiced their former religion (Article 2). While abuses did occur, the numbers often cited by critics are exaggerated. For example, some claim that millions were killed, but these figures are not supported by historical evidence. Fundamentalists often use inflated statistics to criticize the Church (Article 2). It's crucial to recognize that the Church, like any institution, has had its share of sinners and misguided zeal. However, these actions do not negate the divine foundation of the Church. As Jesus said, "the gates of hell shall not prevail against it" (Matthew 16:18). Understanding the historical context and the actual events helps to clarify these complex issues. [CA]I would ask champions of the RCC and its papacy how you justify supporting what has killed and tortured many millions of Christians who would not bow before it.
This alone, should be enough to cause a change of mind.
Arch, feel free to deny whichever you like. Again, I am trying to help and I am not going to quote everything I write for you. Lord willing, He will lead you out.No proof was given regarding his 'research'. How are we supposed to be enlightened?
We all need the Holy Spirit!@Arch Stanton and @donadams I hope you both realize I am just trying to help you both.
Indeed we do.We all need the Holy Spirit!
Do you not find his words interesting Carbon?Why Arch?
He claims Peter as the representative of what? The one and only Church. That speaks volumes Carbon!'In like manner He says, in Matthew xvi, to the one man Peter, who stands as the representative of the one and only Church.'
God even said this...Indeed we do.
So, push your popes aside for now.
Sure Arch, but the popes dont rule over us.God even said this...
Heb 13:17 Obey them that have the RULE OVER YOU, and SUBMIT yourselves: for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief: for that is unprofitable for you.