Josheb
Reformed Non-denominational
- Joined
- May 19, 2023
- Messages
- 4,669
- Reaction score
- 2,007
- Points
- 113
- Location
- VA, south of DC
- Faith
- Yes
- Marital status
- Married with adult children
- Politics
- Conservative
eh.... no blood, no foul. Back to the game .My mistake. . .2 Sa 5:7-16 was a covenant.
Sorry about that.
The point is there is a God-made covenant involving salvation and that mess you and @jeremiah1five are trading posts over should be understood accordingly. Our brother thinks it's all about Jewish converts to Christ and only them (because God has no covenant with Gentiles). I recommend examining the profile and post history, so that you don't waste time beyond your tolerances. We Gentiles are, after all, inordinately prideful.
More op-relevantly, however, the texts I blew through covering the Christological covenant are op-relevant because, according to the New Testament, much of what some people claim to be waiting to happen has already happened. The promised thrown has happened. It's not a physical chair made of wood or gold or some other physical material. It is not an earthly monarchy. According to Luke and Peter, it is the resurrection. I, for one, have never found agreement with @Hobie and scripture regarding what scripture plainly, explicitly states, so I don't expect you will, either. The irony, just in case I have to explain it, is that "if we understand all prophecies......" is a baseless question if prophecies are not correctly understood. It's a red herring. The only way anyone here can answer the question asked is if and only if they correctly understand. It is not something that should be presupposed in an eschatology board because of the profound diversity existing in Christian eschatology and the abject failure of modern futurist to have even one prediction come true in the nearly 200 years they've been making up stuff. So not only is the op baseless and red herring..... it is also bait. It comes with a pre-existing bias that's so entrenched there will be no actual discussion, none with any degree of parity, or cogency, or authenticity. The only options are either like-minded posters stroking each other with non sequiturs or rancor. Lest I be read to be culpable of my own criticism, the reason I belabor all this is because you just did something amazingly admirable, commendable, and exemplary.
I hope all the participants and lurkers take note. Well done, @Eleanor. You read the posts, (presumably) read them for their merits, did not make things personal or adversarial, and in the end acknowledged the facts in evidence.My mistake. . .2 Sa 5:7-16 was a covenant.
Sorry about that.
Do more of that!
Very cool.
Well, for one I might say acknowledging the facts of Acts 2:30-31 because that has profound effect on the question asked. Furthermore, wherever we understand all prophecies, scripture, doctrine, etc. the scriptures answer that question regarding what we need but, curiously that answer is completely absent from the op.What is fullness of belief that is needed by a true Christian..
1 Corinthians 13:1-3
If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but do not have love, I have become a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. If I have the gift of prophecy, and know all mysteries and all knowledge; and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. And if I give all my possessions to feed the poor, and if I surrender my body to be burned, but do not have love, it profits me nothing.
Love is the answer.
1 Corinthians 13:12-13
For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face; now I know in part, but then I will know fully just as I also have been fully known. But now faith, hope, love, abide these three; but the greatest of these is love.
Faith, hope, and love are needed, and the greatest of these is love.
Romans 13:8
Owe nothing to anyone except to love one another; for the one who loves his neighbor has fulfilled the Law.
Certainly, any Law-centric modern futurist should understand this. Why then is it absent from the op? Because modern futurism biases the reading of scripture. The NT writers believed they were living in the ends of the ages, the last days, and all the messianic prophecies had been fulfilled in Jesus bar Joseph from Nazareth. There would be no other. He was resurrected, fulfilling the promises God had made to Abraham and David (and everyone in between). What else was needed?
Love.
1 John 3:10-18
By this the children of God and the children of the devil are obvious: anyone who does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor the one who does not love his brother. For this is the message which you have heard from the beginning, that we should love one another; not as Cain, who was of the evil one and slew his brother. And for what reason did he slay him? Because his deeds were evil, and his brother's were righteous. Do not be surprised, brethren, if the world hates you. We know that we have passed out of death into life, because we love the brethren. He who does not love abides in death. Everyone who hates his brother is a murderer; and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him. We know love by this, that he laid down his life for us; and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren. But whoever has the world's goods, and sees his brother in need and closes his heart against him, how does the love of God abide in him? Little children, let us not love with word or with tongue, but in deed and truth.
It is eschatological.