Josheb
Reformed Non-denominational
- Joined
- May 19, 2023
- Messages
- 4,484
- Reaction score
- 1,958
- Points
- 113
- Location
- VA, south of DC
- Faith
- Yes
- Marital status
- Married with adult children
- Politics
- Conservative
I am inclined to agree with the premise sin is the absence or antithesis of good, but that does not preclude sin from having an "ontology." It is the nature of sin to corrupt and kill everything it infects. It's like rust. It mindlessly corrodes everything it can and unless intervened upon brings everything it touches eventually to naught.fastfredy0 said:
Sin (evil) does not exist. It is the lack of righteousness in a person/spirit.
Evil is nothing. It is not a thing that has existence. It is an action of something that is a thing. When I do something that is not good, then I am doing something that is evil, but evil then is an activity of some being. It has no being of itself. R.C.Sproul
If Augustine's approach is fair, it prompts a pair of syllogisms that lead to a different conclusion.
First:
1) All things that God created are good;
2) evil is not good;
3) therefore, evil was not created by God.
Second:
1) God created everything;
2) God did not create evil;
3) therefore, evil is not a thing.
Occurs to me to ask, "Does sin have ontology?" Does darkness?
I'm inviting @Josheb to chime in here, with his clear mind.
The second syllogism is faulty. The first mistake is that God created everything that was made. The second is that creating something does not preclude its antithesis as either an existing alternative or a potentially existing alternative. Sin and transgressional death were conditional effects or consequence. "If you eat then you will die," is a conditional statement. "If you disobey me then you will become sinful," is a conditional statement. When the condition X is realized then the consequence Y ensues. This is a dialectic (two seemingly contradictory premises that, when synthesized create something different or new). Creation is full of them. God made a good world that had the potential to become not-good. That potentiality was realized (as God knew it would) and something entirely different than what God had originally made ensued. Makes a huge difference to us.
Does not change God or His plan one fraction of an iota.
I must add: this op is about post-disobedient conditions, not pre-disobedient conditions. Attempting to explain Pharoah's heart condition by means of a good and sinless world is a categorical error. Pharoah was never good or sinless. His heart, therefore, was never like the pre-disobedient Adam's prior to Genesis 3:6-7.